GOOD REVIEWS discussion
Self Publishing
>
KIRKUS REVIEWS ??????????
date
newest »

message 1:
by
J.P.
(new)
Aug 01, 2017 06:08AM

reply
|
flag

That part is sort of a "given" no?
Jaime, did you not find your critique constructive? Or did you think it was of poor quality? I've found Readers Favorite reviews, while often quite detailed, can also be cringe-worthy in their style/grammar/etc. I assumed that Kirkus, with its WAY higher price point would be higher in quality too - I've flirted with the idea, but was never quite ready to pull that expensive trigger. So I'd be interested to hear more about your experience!

That part is sort of a "given" no?"
I suppose low reviews may have value in that the companies can use them as a demonstration to applicants that the process is rigorous.

Having said that, I'm not sure I understand your differing meaning between producing a bad review and giving a bad review, as I do not believe anyone would intentionally pay to have another produce a bad review.
Except of course for the purpose you have stated above. Yet this will have no benefit to the writer that is paying for the review in the first place...

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-re....
Some of Jaime's points are, I think, coloured by his emotions - but his response isn't entirely unwarranted. Even if Sonora Pass isn't a particularly good piece of work (and I have no way of telling as I haven't read it), about 60% of the Kirkus review is clunky 'and then, and then'. This, I think, is more problematic than pointing out the flaws.
People tend to respond better to criticism from a source they trust.
I am aware, by the way, of the weirdness of critiquing a critique.


That said, I agree that the quality of the reviews -- mine and Jaime's -- is less than professional. And that surprised me. My reviewer didn't even notice that my protagonist is a lunatic!


I looked at your review too !
Thanks for your feedback !
Speaking up is OK in America. This is not Putin country ..

In what respect? Interesting and retribution in the same sentence, I fail to see the connection...I don't see how your KIrkus review could possibly have any correlation to future reviews....how are they related?


I created a group where indie authors can review each other's' ebooks.
https://www.goodreads.com/group/show/...
The approach is described on that page. I've seen some other groups for review of indie books, but I like the idea here is for us to review each other's' ebooks. I'm thinking this will have special appeal for KU authors but it can work for others too.
As I understand it, we have to be careful of review exchanges. The system that I propose can be explained as:
Author A reviews Author B's book
Author B reviews Author C's book
Author C reviews Author A's book
Reviews can be short & sweet. We each choose the book we want. If we want a free ebook, that's what we choose. If we're willing to pay something, we choose a book that has a price.
We each announce which book we're reading. Then authors pick other books. I'm willing to keep track of the reviews in terms of numbers given for each book. The more books you review, the more times that book becomes available for others to review = that's the incentive.
This process may need tweaking as we go along. That's great. I just want to get something started where we're not doing exchanges per se.
Also for those of us on Kindle Unlimited, this makes money for the author. And other authors get good reviews on Goodreads.

Best Regards,
Robert J
http://robertjbooks.com