All About Books discussion

This topic is about
The Fugitive
Yearly Challenges
>
2017 Proust Challenge Book 6: The Fugitive (midSeptember-October)
message 1:
by
Tom
(new)
Sep 05, 2017 05:06PM

reply
|
flag

I have to say that as much as Proust likes to ramble on and on, he does leave us with cliff-hangers at the end of each book.
One is glad to finally get to the end and.....wham!......one wants to start the next book. LOL!

I had to laugh when (view spoiler)
Tom, I probably haven't gotten to the "best opening ever" part???

It sure was a relief, but now I'm 30 pages into The Fugitive and on tenterhooks that (view spoiler)
"We lie with our suffering as in a bed too narrow, too hard, and too cold."
Indeed, somehow I haven't much sympathy.

I had to laugh when [spoilers removed]
Tom, I probably haven't gotten to the "best opening ever" part???"
It is very near the beginning. (view spoiler)

♫ Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you got til it's gone. ♫
He's one of those people who are never happy and always wish for what they currently don't have.




Tom, the quote about intellect vs will intrigued me - I found this at my favorite on-line philosophy site
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hu...
Hume's position in ethics, which is based on his empiricist theory of the mind, is best known for asserting four theses: (1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (see Section 3) (2) Moral distinctions are not derived from reason (see Section 4). (3) Moral distinctions are derived from the moral sentiments: feelings of approval (esteem, praise) and disapproval (blame) felt by spectators who contemplate a character trait or action (see Section 7). (4) While some virtues and vices are natural (see Section 13), others, including justice, are artificial (see Section 9). There is heated debate about what Hume intends by each of these theses and how he argues for them. He articulates and defends them within the broader context of his metaethics and his ethic of virtue and vice.

As when the narrator comments on the photo of Albertine - when we look at a picture of a loved one we see so much that isn't actually there.

LOL - just the break I needed listening to different versions of Big Yellow Taxi.



I honestly don't think the notion of being responsible has occurred to him.

Joan, as to responsibility, I agree with Tom. Our narrator doesn't seem to have a notion on responsibility.
As a general statement, though, I think that line of thinking is possible. If a victim is compliant, that must make the abuser's actions correct and perhaps be seen by the abuser to be too weak. The abuser would then tighten up his actions.
The abuser in any situation would need to feel that the power is in his/her hands. A compliant victim indicates less power.

I have been reading the Kindle edition of In Search of Lost Time, and a few disappointments have presented themselves, such as the lack of page numbers and chapter dividers within the books.

I've made little progress since last week. I want to get back to this soon.
It's a surprisingly good read......despite all that navel gazing. I really like the characters. They grow on you.


When Aimee writes the letters, (view spoiler)


I was just thinking about that link I posted when we started reading In Search of Lost Time - about people who actually do have total recall. While they can relive the happy moments of their lives, they also can do the same with the sad moments too.


I know the decadence of the upper classes is said to a theme of this series; nevertheless (view spoiler) I hope he doesn't let me down.


Then too, so much of memory is subjective - like did your friend say hello with a grin or a smirk.



I was pleased that the narrator didn't get away with taking that little girl home with him. He got off light but at least he had his wrists slapped.
At times I find the ruminating on losing Albertine, whether he's in love with her or not, how to get her back, etc. a bit much but Proust also words things so well and its insightful, therefore, interesting as well. A bit of a conundrum.
He's so all over the place with his thoughts and his strategies of getting Albertine back are bizarre:
- I'll tell her I don't want her back
- I'll tell her about lovely presents so that she'll come running back
- I'll make her jealous by having another woman live with me
I'm about half way through the book. Just after the beginning, it started to get boring but it's picked up again and I'm reinvested. I hope to make better progress in the coming week.
Joan, you're finished, aren't you?
Tom, how are you doing? Have you gotten past the section that was making your eyes glaze last night?


I think I know the general section where you are at, Tom. That part was difficult for me, too. It has picked up, so whether or not I'm still in Chapter 1, it does start to get more interesting.
All I'll remember from that section is the agonizing over "why did she leave me before I could ask her to leave? Didn't she know I love her and want her to stay (so that I can kick her out)?"
He's bizarre.

I don't think it really matters other than for reference. Thanks anyway, Tom.

at first I was having a hard time focusing, too. I set a 15 page per day target for myself when we started this series, but the narrator's stratagems & neuroses where slowing me down. Then suddenly the book became a page-turner for me. The psychological turmoil at the end of Chapter 1 seems so true, and well described, I just couldn't stop reading.
(view spoiler)
I wonder how different this section would be if Proust had ever had a child. I know he was gay, but he would have experienced a different kind of love.
But in the last 2 days I've only managed 5 pages - so much for my plan. "The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men / Gang aft agley" :-)

I'm not sure whether to be pleased or worried that I was thinking like Proust.

But then I'm often just cynical.

Why had she not said to me: "I have those tastes:? I would have yielded, would have allowed her to gratify them."
Isn't he contradicting himself here? On the one hand, he says a person has no hold on the life of another; on the other hand he says another person would need him to allow them to live this life.
I'm still not sure where Chapter 1 ends but am pretty sure I'm beyond it. I don't remember that sentence, Tom. I flipped a few pages ahead from the quote above and Aimee's letter is very close.
Books mentioned in this topic
Forsyth Saga: Complete - All Three Volumes (other topics)The Captive (other topics)
Marcel Proust's Search for Lost Time: A Reader's Guide to The Remembrance of Things Past (other topics)
Brain on Fire: My Month of Madness (other topics)
Swords and Deviltry (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Susannah Cahalan (other topics)Fritz Leiber (other topics)
Fritz Leiber (other topics)
Marcel Proust (other topics)