Horror Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
All Heads Turn When the Hunt Goes By
Buddy Reads
>
All Heads Turn When the Hunt Goes By - John Farris



I finished Part 1 (p. 64) -
Farris' writing style is very literate. I've heard him described as Southern Gothic and I'd agree with that. It has a southern Peter Straub-kind of feel to it, which I like. The content of Part 1, however, is a head scratcher, at best.
(view spoiler)
Now, I get that there's more to it than that, but that's the essence of it once you boil it down. I can't wait to see what Farris has in store for us in Part 2!
Farris' writing style is very literate. I've heard him described as Southern Gothic and I'd agree with that. It has a southern Peter Straub-kind of feel to it, which I like. The content of Part 1, however, is a head scratcher, at best.
(view spoiler)
Now, I get that there's more to it than that, but that's the essence of it once you boil it down. I can't wait to see what Farris has in store for us in Part 2!

Finished Part 2 -
It's got me wondering how it all ties together with Part 1. (view spoiler)
How is everyone else liking it, so far?
It's got me wondering how it all ties together with Part 1. (view spoiler)
How is everyone else liking it, so far?

The first two parts were choppy for me. The next two felt smoother, like he hit his groove. I'm invested in the story. I want to see where all this nuttiness is leading.


So far I'm liking it. I keep noticing weird errors/typos? in the text so that's a little strange.
but i loved how the book opened - the chapel scene was crazy. can't wait to learn wtf happened.
(view spoiler)
Rachel wrote: "I finished part 1.
So far I'm liking it. I keep noticing weird errors/typos? in the text so that's a little strange.
but i loved how the book opened - the chapel scene was crazy. can't wait to le..."
I have the same typos in mine. Oddly enough, typos don't make or break a book for me like some people. I get what the author is trying to say and I don't lose my mind over it. To each their own, I guess.
The chapel scene was definitely crazy. This is definitely one family with some skeletons in their closets!
So far I'm liking it. I keep noticing weird errors/typos? in the text so that's a little strange.
but i loved how the book opened - the chapel scene was crazy. can't wait to le..."
I have the same typos in mine. Oddly enough, typos don't make or break a book for me like some people. I get what the author is trying to say and I don't lose my mind over it. To each their own, I guess.
The chapel scene was definitely crazy. This is definitely one family with some skeletons in their closets!

Finished this last night and the story is really sticking with me. This is my first Farris read and his writing style is very vibrant and almost poetic in some places. The ending felt a little rushed, but still a very good story. I'm looking forward to what all of you think about and discussing more in detail.
Jackson's extreme and paralyzingly phobia of snakes is something I can't imagine. Does anyone else have a severe phobia that borderline incapacitates you?
I’m around 60%. I’ll read more soon but I’m getting sleepy and cNt right now. I’m afraid of spiders. I won’t get anywhere near them so maybe? I feel that if I was ever to bitten by one I’d go insane. I just cant imagine how I would deal with it. I think it would be very bad. No, I’m not joking.

Rachel wrote: "I'm at 28%. Part 2 was very interesting. Can't wait to see how it all ties together. hmm, there is a 2 year gap in btwn parts 1-2 and 3. Part 1 and 2 take place in 1942, and part is in 1944. i like..."
I also like my horror thats set in the past. Robert McCammon once said that it's getting harder as an author to scare anyone with a modern setting because with technology, no one is ever isolated. You can get ahold of anyone 3 different ways to Sunday in today's world, but in the 1940s, hell telephones were even sketchy.
I also like my horror thats set in the past. Robert McCammon once said that it's getting harder as an author to scare anyone with a modern setting because with technology, no one is ever isolated. You can get ahold of anyone 3 different ways to Sunday in today's world, but in the 1940s, hell telephones were even sketchy.

I agree Ken horror set in the past can be very good. Some horror films try to deal with the issue of mobiles, like remake of Hills have eyes where they have no reception. But the fear of proper isolation in the original was more powerful.
Robert McCammon recently spoke about that very thing. He said that horror was much harder to make realistic with arrival of the cell phone. It's hard to isolate characters when everyone around you is connected to the world by six different devices and cell phone signals blanket the globe.
I’m at 87% and ready for the book to end. It’s not as good as I hoped it would be. I should be loving it but it’s just not clicking with me.

"I keep hearing voices in my cell phone, and they're telling me to do terrible things ... just terrible things ... but they seem so right."
I don't know. Farris must've clicked all the right notes with me on this one. I really liked it and thought it had a similar feel to Straub's work. I liked all the layers in his writing and how, at times, it seemed almost poetic. I did think the ending felt rushed and would've preferred something not so fragmented.
I didn’t think it was rushed, I was just ready to get it over with. I don’t think I’ve read much of Straub’s work. Maybe 1 or 2.
So far, we have:
Ken
Latasha
Lena
Mehmet
Rachel
Anyone else interested in joining?