The Sword and Laser discussion
If you lived in a Sci-fi/ fantasy world would you still be into nerdy fiction?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Christos
(last edited May 07, 2018 09:58PM)
(new)
May 07, 2018 09:55PM

reply
|
flag

The only real escapist art form would be musicals, and in some universes (Buffy) even those would be ruined for you.

That's a really good question Christos. I think that no matter what world you live in some people would still fantasize about living some other life. Our world is pretty spectacular compared to any other time and place in history but still we dream of something better or more exciting.


LouLouReads wrote: "By a lot of measures, I *do* live in a science fiction world "
This.
The sci-fi we read today will seem quaint in a few hundred years.
We will find something to fantasise about and nerd out over.
This.
The sci-fi we read today will seem quaint in a few hundred years.
We will find something to fantasise about and nerd out over.

That's a really good question Christos. I think that no matter what world you live in some people would still fantasize about living some o..."
That reminds me of a cartoon in (I think) the 2nd edition AD&D manuals (the only time when that game had a sense of humour about itself). One cartoon had a PC group (wizard, barbarian, etc) sat around a table with paper & dice and the magic user saying "My level 3 accountant fills in his tax form..."
( as always, describing a joke makes it even funnier... )


Muhaahahahahahaha

I'd say, yes. I think, even in a universe where those things exist, there'd be plenty of demand for outlets to fantasize about them, perhaps even moreso. Just because those things exist doesn't mean everyone has the ability or aptitude to experience them. For every Sorcerer Supreme or John Constantine, there's probably millions of "normal" people. If those people know superheroes or magic users exist, why wouldn't they fantasize about being them? Like how people in the real world fantasize about being pro athletes or movie stars



The underlying question is what do we fantasize about and why? Is it about the unknowable or impossible (magic, aliens, and the like)? If those became not just knowable and real but a part of our everyday lives, I think we might find other things to occupy the fantasy niche in our lives. What that would be... I've no idea.
John (Taloni) wrote: "I live in a world with the Internet, smart phones, and genetically engineered drugs. I still read SFF. So yeah."
But that's trimmings. If you grew up in the mid-20th century the SF wasn't just communicators, but traveling the stars, meeting aliens. Just because we have a few of those technologies doesn't mean we exist in a SFF world. On the other hand... as we do, edge into it gradually and it becomes everyday, mundane. Ask a 15 year old and they will likely just assume that of course the web and smartphones and the like are an ordinary part of life. Their kids will accept things that would seem amazing to us.

I think a lot of people hit on this already, but yeah people would still fantasize about those things. People who aren't wizards would fantacize about being wizards. People who are weak would look up to warriors. It's akin to how people look up to Police officers, Military, or their favorite person. If anything it would be more commonplace for people to fantasize about it than not due to cultures more likely than not centering around those people much how society today idolizes movie stars. Except these stars wouldn't need green screens to fight dragons and such.

And yes, we will continue to read about even more fantastic things as technology advances. It's the nature of the nerdy viewpoint to think about what might be.

But would the segment of people who currently fantasize about magic, aliens and the like merely fantasize about those things? After all, that fiction would become more like the crime and thriller or military fiction of our world - fiction that some people buy and love but not the same niche as SFF since it's really just an idealized version of something that exists.
Would there be a new niche that arises to take the place of what we consider SFF now, and would people in such a world find new things that don't exist to occupy that niche?
The question, to me, is about the use and place in our lives of fantasy. Building worlds that don't and perhaps can't exist lets us explore things that the real world does not.
@John Taloni - communicators to me are trimmings. The meat of Trek is interstellar exploration, not the tools.

I don’t recall offhand if they have their version of Law & Order: Powers Division, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they do. They definitely have reality TV based around superpowers, as well as shows like Cops.
I think treating it like that is much more realistic than the “secret world” gambit where wizards and shapeshifters are all over the place yet no one seems to notice. If there are like five sorcerers in the world, then sure, but once you start getting dozens of them they become impossible to hide.

I agree. We don't see it much in the movies (except for the scene at the end of Last Jedi) but I imagine, in the Star Wars universe, people without Force abilities would romanticize the Jedi and fantasize about being Jedi, much the same way we treat knights in shining armor or other heroic figures. Heck, nerds in the Star Wars universe probably play Rancors and Asteroids.
Scott wrote: "Heck, nerds in the Star Wars universe probably play Rancors and Asteroids. "
or Dejarik
"Let the Wookie Win" ;-)
or Dejarik
"Let the Wookie Win" ;-)

As for "Law And Order: Special Powers Unit," I think I would have to tune into that show every week.



This is a good point and maybe a different perspective from mine. I am a scientist (for a given value of scientist) and yet I read about scientists all the time, non-fiction and fiction. I'm currently reading The Vaccine Race, non-fiction about the development of the polio vaccine, despite the fact that I have both been vaccinated against polio and administered many many polio vaccines to children in my previous job. So I would probably be interested in both scientific non-fiction and SFF of whatever world I lived in.


When i think back to my grandparents who lived through wwII i have to say, they did enjoy watching quiet films. In those films the worst thing that happened was having the hunters daughter fall in love with the rich farmer's son and the familiy being against it. In the end everything turned out fine and you saw lots of lovely, scenic mountains in the background. Furthermore all the people i met who have been refugees in some time of their lifes don't read grimdark books but prefer "happy books".

Yeah I find a lot of dystopian fiction is just... really not very hard-hitting. I recently went through a spate of Lemming dystopian books because I found their visions of the future just felt quite basic and not at all grounded in the real dystopian shit that's happening right now.

I think the OP misses a real point: for many decades, "nerd" was a category other people put one into. The societies in superhero comics are, at best, no more tolerant of the factors that put people in the nerd bin than Real Life is.
In the broader sf/f sense, what would end up being "nerdy fiction? Although in most fantasy worlds, 90+ percent of humans would be illiterate subsistence farmers, so there'd probably be no genre literature.