Literary Fiction by People of Color discussion

This topic is about
Little Fires Everywhere
book discussions
>
Discussion: Little Fires Everywhere
date
newest »

message 1:
by
ColumbusReads
(new)
-
added it
Jun 10, 2018 06:06AM

reply
|
flag
Discussion schedule:
Epigraph thru Chap 5 - July 1 thru July 6
Chap 6 thru 10 - July 7 thru 14
Chap 11 thru 15 - July 15 thru 22
Entire book open July 23rd
Epigraph thru Chap 5 - July 1 thru July 6
Chap 6 thru 10 - July 7 thru 14
Chap 11 thru 15 - July 15 thru 22
Entire book open July 23rd
The discussion for Celeste Ng’s über-popular Little Fire’s Everywhere begins today. So you can actually start the epigraph through chap 5 now.
I read this book at the time of its release and really enjoyed it. In fact, I liked it more than her debut which is surprising. I liked her debut. Was that a LFPC discussion book? Can’t recall.
Has anyone else read Ng? Currently reading? Any thoughts on her writing?
I read this book at the time of its release and really enjoyed it. In fact, I liked it more than her debut which is surprising. I liked her debut. Was that a LFPC discussion book? Can’t recall.
Has anyone else read Ng? Currently reading? Any thoughts on her writing?
Lata wrote: "This will be my first Ng, and I’m looking forward to it and the discussion."
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Lata.
The book moves really fast and I think it only took me two days to read each book. I wasn’t trying to sail through it just happened that way.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Lata.
The book moves really fast and I think it only took me two days to read each book. I wasn’t trying to sail through it just happened that way.

Since I have some library books I have to finish first, I’ll have to wait till mid month or so to get to this book.
This book takes place in Shaker Heights, Ohio, a planned community. Anyone currently live in a planned community?
There’s one right next door to me, Peachtree City, and it’s considered a master planned community, whatever that means. You drive through and you see more people on golf carts grocery shopping, picking up laundry and going to the library than in cars. Rather idyllic community with an extremely low crime rate (lowest in GA for many years) but seemed rather strange in a way. Stepford wifeish.
There’s one right next door to me, Peachtree City, and it’s considered a master planned community, whatever that means. You drive through and you see more people on golf carts grocery shopping, picking up laundry and going to the library than in cars. Rather idyllic community with an extremely low crime rate (lowest in GA for many years) but seemed rather strange in a way. Stepford wifeish.

I have become more interested in reading this book as I understand the community - Shaker Heights - is a "character" in the book and my cousin lived there for a couple of years in the early 60s when his family moved to the Cleveland area and a couple of months ago we were discussing growing up in the Cleveland area.
I have lived in a "planned" community for a couple of years in Rockville Md, before I moved out of state. It was not necessarily a planned decision but I liked living there.



The authors website:
https://www.celesteng.com
Review of the book in The Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...
Here’s the author in conversation with Nicole Chung at Politics and Prose:
https://youtu.be/1qgsXs7CTx0
https://www.celesteng.com
Review of the book in The Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...
Here’s the author in conversation with Nicole Chung at Politics and Prose:
https://youtu.be/1qgsXs7CTx0


I also liked this book better than her earlier one, which I read a few years ago for another bookclub.

While I know everyone is entitled to their own opinions and every book is not for everybody & that it is the job of marketing depts to ensure a book gets all the buzz that it can, but often the buzz raises my expectations of a book and then while it may be a good read I often feel a sense of disappointment.
Did you read the author’s first book?

I think the characters that stook out to me most in LFE were definitely the matriarchs. After a few pages with Mrs. Richardson, I knew exactly what kind of woman she was and I was intrigued by seeing how far she would go to believe she still has some control over her little so-called perfect life.
I found Mia to be a fascinating character. I was really intrigued by how she came into womanhood and her own particular brand of mothering as she grew with Pearl. I know it was not plainly stated, but I believed Mia to be an asexual character, which is a sexual identity that VERY rarely gets any visibility.



Now LFE is a whole notha beast entirely. lol.
And I agree with you Janet, it wasn't til I got about 50 pages into LFE that I began to felt compelled to keep on reading.
I am very excited to see what Celeste has up her sleeve in the future. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a sequel to LFE, but who knows!
How about we open the entire book for discussion instead of waiting til the 23rd. Anyone have a problem with that?
What does the title mean. Or what does it mean to you?
I thought the author handled all the multitude of issues and storylines very well in this book. Very poignant moments with the kids and the relationships with the adults. Particularly enjoyed the friendship between Mia, the artist, and the daughter Lexie Richardson. (Excuse me if I have the names wrong since I no longer have the book). Ng’s juggling of all these issues appeared seamless and so fluent quite unlike her first book which I also enjoyed.
I thought the author handled all the multitude of issues and storylines very well in this book. Very poignant moments with the kids and the relationships with the adults. Particularly enjoyed the friendship between Mia, the artist, and the daughter Lexie Richardson. (Excuse me if I have the names wrong since I no longer have the book). Ng’s juggling of all these issues appeared seamless and so fluent quite unlike her first book which I also enjoyed.
I like this statement from Ng in an earlier interview:
Little Fires Everywhere is less about arson than babies. Ng constructs a three-ring circus, each subplot posing a moral quandary regarding an infant. 1) Close friends of the Richardsons have taken in a baby abandoned at a fire station, whom they hope to adopt. But the little girl’s Chinese mother has got her act together, and wants her daughter back. 2) Years before, the Richardson’s tenant, Mia, carried a child for an affluent but infertile couple, after manually inseminating herself with the man’s sperm. Yet she began to form an attachment to the unborn child. 3) The older Richardson daughter gets pregnant by her unwitting boyfriend. Her family could afford to raise the baby, but a child would interfere with her forthcoming university education.
In each instance, whose rights and desires take precedence?
“It came, over and over, down to this,” Ng spells out, perhaps too explicitly. “What made someone a mother? Was it biology alone, or was it love.
Little Fires Everywhere is less about arson than babies. Ng constructs a three-ring circus, each subplot posing a moral quandary regarding an infant. 1) Close friends of the Richardsons have taken in a baby abandoned at a fire station, whom they hope to adopt. But the little girl’s Chinese mother has got her act together, and wants her daughter back. 2) Years before, the Richardson’s tenant, Mia, carried a child for an affluent but infertile couple, after manually inseminating herself with the man’s sperm. Yet she began to form an attachment to the unborn child. 3) The older Richardson daughter gets pregnant by her unwitting boyfriend. Her family could afford to raise the baby, but a child would interfere with her forthcoming university education.
In each instance, whose rights and desires take precedence?
“It came, over and over, down to this,” Ng spells out, perhaps too explicitly. “What made someone a mother? Was it biology alone, or was it love.
I liked Ng’s response to this below:
Little Fires Everywhere is less about arson than babies. Ng constructs a three-ring circus, each subplot posing a moral quandary regarding an infant. 1) Close friends of the Richardsons have taken in a baby abandoned at a fire station, whom they hope to adopt. But the little girl’s Chinese mother has got her act together, and wants her daughter back. 2) Years before, the Richardson’s tenant, Mia, carried a child for an affluent but infertile couple, after manually inseminating herself with the man’s sperm. Yet she began to form an attachment to the unborn child. 3) The older Richardson daughter gets pregnant by her unwitting boyfriend. Her family could afford to raise the baby, but a child would interfere with her forthcoming university education. (Guardian)
In each instance, whose rights and desires take precedence?
“It came, over and over, down to this,” Ng spells out, perhaps too explicitly. “What made someone a mother? Was it biology alone, or was it love.
I tried very hard in writing the book to show that this is a complicated situation. I think that right now our sort of natural sympathies are often with the biological mother. We tend to prioritize that — in not all cases, but in many cases.
Little Fires Everywhere is less about arson than babies. Ng constructs a three-ring circus, each subplot posing a moral quandary regarding an infant. 1) Close friends of the Richardsons have taken in a baby abandoned at a fire station, whom they hope to adopt. But the little girl’s Chinese mother has got her act together, and wants her daughter back. 2) Years before, the Richardson’s tenant, Mia, carried a child for an affluent but infertile couple, after manually inseminating herself with the man’s sperm. Yet she began to form an attachment to the unborn child. 3) The older Richardson daughter gets pregnant by her unwitting boyfriend. Her family could afford to raise the baby, but a child would interfere with her forthcoming university education. (Guardian)
In each instance, whose rights and desires take precedence?
“It came, over and over, down to this,” Ng spells out, perhaps too explicitly. “What made someone a mother? Was it biology alone, or was it love.
I tried very hard in writing the book to show that this is a complicated situation. I think that right now our sort of natural sympathies are often with the biological mother. We tend to prioritize that — in not all cases, but in many cases.

On top of that, I ran the immigrant visa section at our embassy in Seoul for 3 years, which at that time was processing large numbers of adoptions for the US, some 4-5 thousand while I was there. I was heavily engaged with US and Korean officials, plus the 4 Korean adoption agencies handling foreign adoptions plus US agencies etc, etc, etc. Most of these children were born out of wedlock as Korean single mothers were not treated well socially. Koreans were generally not very interested in adopting these kids and traditionally those who did usually hid that fact from the kids and everyone else, to the extent that they would normally only consider children of compatible blood types, as children were blood typed in elementary school, and it's hard to maintain the secret if the kid has a blood type that clearly did not come from the adopting parents. The Korean government was in the process of shrinking the program as its existence was considered a national embarrassment given South Korea's economic status and there were several groups of Korean adoptees that were overwhelmingly anti foreign adoptions. Many of these were children adopted in countries other than the US. The government tried very hard to encourage Korean citizens to adopt with a national adoption day celebration that was promoted and televised , but with limited success as there were always more available kids than prospective Korean families. so lots of these kids ended up remaining in orphanages, more or less permanently.
So, this is to say, I tend to look at the story line from a personal and professional perspective and I agree with Ng that it's rather complicated.

http://www.essaypress.org/mary-kim-ar...


Same here, Adrienna.
I hope it's okay if I bring that discussion up again. I read in another discussion that William wanted to start the book as well and he wrote that there is a series based on it. Lucky me, the series has now also been started in Germany and I finished the book shortly before.
Has anyone seen the series yet?
Since I don't want to spoil, just this much:
I liked the book by Celeste Ng, but was not as overwhelmed as I thought. The content, the construction of the novel and the narrative style appealed to me a lot, but for me the story built up too slowly and it was hard for me to continue. The series, on the other hand, has been a permanent aha-moment for me and has captivated me a lot.

I didn't read the book first as I intended. Someone shared their streaming service password with me so I figured I better watch the series while I could. I thought it was pretty engaging. But I still have about half to go as other more pressing claims on my binge watching time have come up. I hope to finish soon though. Given your rather lukewarm endorsement of the book maybe I'll give it a pass.

Enjoy your binge watching time!

I enjoyed both the book and the series..especially the series, because of the terrific acting.

That's really interesting about the adoption process George.
I missed the discussion about this book, but I really loved it. I never bother much with hype and so I don't get underwhelmed when I finally read the book because of the marketing and publicity. I loved the slow thoughtful way Ng explored everything in Little Fires. Gonna start watching the series soon.

I also enjoyed "Everything I Never Told You" which I read after discovering "Fires".

Once again, I tried to watch the series on Hulu and barely finished the first episode, sadly, I didn't return back yet. I have another week off before returning to work and catching up on so many movies, series, and shows, also reading that I barely have time to do. I make time to read at work here and there, being a librarian, is a plus.

good to know, unsure why I couldn't complete it. Try another season.

Thanks, William. I will go with the series since so many give it rave ratings or comments about it. I read quite a bit, but no longer will force myself to read everything because others enjoyed it. I appreciate your comments.