Support for Indie Authors discussion
Marketing Tactics
>
Engaging positively with book reviewers
date
newest »



Justin wrote: "Reviews aren't for the author they're for potential readers."
This, several times over.
---
Anyway, I had an author like my reviews here on GR a few times, which I think as a nice token - and something you might do. A good reader will appreciate it, I believe.
This, several times over.
---
Anyway, I had an author like my reviews here on GR a few times, which I think as a nice token - and something you might do. A good reader will appreciate it, I believe.


Not everyone is going to like your work but the best thing to do is take the negative in stride and improve.

Especially if the review is fair. If someone says "It just wasn't for me", I fully respect that. Often, parts that were criticized by one were praised by another.
"Don't engage" is aimed at all authors. Whether you have good intentions or not, it's just a risk not worth taking. Stated at least as much as "don't engage" is "reviews are not for authors". If a reviewer wants to interact with you, well, that's why we all have social media accounts.

Thanks. Coincidentally, shortly after posting my question, I started wondering it was okay to like a review. It seems like a less intrusive way to show my appreciation, without letting possibly-unwelcome words muddy the interaction.

Peter, are you referring to book bloggers, where you've submitted a book for consideration?
I assume this wouldn't apply to something like NetGalley, which is more of a mass-invitation.


Ebook Publishing > Would it be inappropriate - I'm genuinely asking and don't want to upset anyone
In that conversation, Addison mentioned that Goodreads has a policy strictly prohibiting authors from contacting reviewers. I was curious about that. You can see the policy by clicking "Terms" in the footer, then "Author Guidelines" in the sidebar to the right.
The injunction is specifically about engaging with negative reviews: "Remember that Goodreads is a public space; other readers will see a reaction from the author and interpret it as hostile regardless of how carefully the response was crafted."
Engaging positively with a positive reviewer isn't addressed, though all the good advice in this conversation applies to that.
When it comes to book reviews, I keep seeing the mantra: Don't engage.
This advice is usually aimed at authors who badly want to "educate" a negative reviewer. I'd never consider doing that—but I am interested in responding with gratitude to some reviews (positive or negative) that include helpful criticism.
If I learn something from a review, I'm grateful the reviewer took the time to write it. Even if the review is negative, it doesn't seem like this would make things worse. In the best case, the reviewer will know I took them seriously.
Anyone have experience with this kind of positive engagement in response to criticism? Any warnings? Horror stories?