The Book Vipers discussion

This topic is about
The Picture of Dorian Gray
Group Read Archive
>
Classics Group Read (pre 1900) - The Picture of Dorian Gray - January 2015 - SPOILERS ALLOWED
date
newest »



How sad it is! I shall grow old, and horrible, and dreadful. But this picture will remain always young. It will never be older than this particular day of June... If it were only the other way! If it were I who was to be always young, and the picture that was to grow old! For that-for that-I would give everything! Yes, there is nothing in the whole world I would not give! I would give my soul for that!
I'm fairly sure there are a fair few folk in the world that would share that sentiment, particularly some celebrities!!! Though my favourite Oscar Wilde read is The Importance of Being Ernest, I still really enjoyed this one.
I loved this, read it relatively recently for the second time and it is a sorry tale if ever there were one! His vanity is his torment.


Finished this last night. I think it is a really clever, classic, memorable plot and is faultless in its character portrayals and murky moral message.
Henry is one of literature's great cynical characters and he has all the best lines, although at times his dialogue degenerated into the sort of speechifying that I think works better in a play than in a novel (which is why 'Earnest' is probably Wilde's best work).
The book is also marred by a bit of terrible showing-off by Oscar. Someone mentioned Chapter 11 elsewhere, where Wilde is telling us that how Dorian Grey goes out to seek pleasure in the manner of the book Henry gave him, and this was the worst example of intellectually robust but fundamentally unreadable narration - it was like wading through treacle and added so very little to the story.
Having said that though, there was a lot to enjoy about this book and I am very glad to have read it at last.
Henry is one of literature's great cynical characters and he has all the best lines, although at times his dialogue degenerated into the sort of speechifying that I think works better in a play than in a novel (which is why 'Earnest' is probably Wilde's best work).
The book is also marred by a bit of terrible showing-off by Oscar. Someone mentioned Chapter 11 elsewhere, where Wilde is telling us that how Dorian Grey goes out to seek pleasure in the manner of the book Henry gave him, and this was the worst example of intellectually robust but fundamentally unreadable narration - it was like wading through treacle and added so very little to the story.
Having said that though, there was a lot to enjoy about this book and I am very glad to have read it at last.
Ohh I read this in 2011 and I really enjoyed it. It amazes me how hundreds of years ago they thought of these kinds of stories, with mystery and strange phenomenon.
Must admit I love the movie with Ben Barnes in it also...
Must admit I love the movie with Ben Barnes in it also...

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I just loved this, not just a book of the year but possibly a lifetime. Why have I never read this before?
I loved the philosophy, the ethical dilemmas, the darkness and the melodrama

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I just loved this, not just a book of the year but possibly a lifetime. Why have I never read this before?
I loved the philosophy, the ethical dilemmas, the darkness and the melodrama


1. Orchids are mentioned repeatedly throughout the book. Is there some symbolism here?
2. What does Dorian write on the piece of paper that he hands to his friend to get him to agree to dispose of Basil Hallward's body? The answer is probably obvious but I must have missed it.
I think orchids were just a signpost of Grey's self-indulgence and ego. They would presumably have been exquisitely rare and expensive then, and him having a special supplier for his houses is a mark of extravagance. Possibly there is some element of how 'pure' an orchid is... but not sure if that's overstating it.
It is clear that Grey left all who came in contact with him in some kind of social ruin by leading them into various bad ways. So whatever it was (and possibly it didn't need to be said), the poor 'friend' was obviously facing a terrible secret coming out that was enough to make him do the terrible deed, and subsequently commit suicide. I did wonder if it was related to homosexuality but that, of course, only comes from knowing the writer's predilections?
It is clear that Grey left all who came in contact with him in some kind of social ruin by leading them into various bad ways. So whatever it was (and possibly it didn't need to be said), the poor 'friend' was obviously facing a terrible secret coming out that was enough to make him do the terrible deed, and subsequently commit suicide. I did wonder if it was related to homosexuality but that, of course, only comes from knowing the writer's predilections?

Will look out for the film too. I was amused that my library copy was a tie in to a film version, and on the back had the lines 'Forever young...forever cursed'. Aiming at Twilight fans, perhaps?

The plot seemed to develop, but really key moments were, I felt, very understated and many of these passed by unremarkably. An example is the central statement made by Dorian about the painting that leads to it bearing his aging and corruption. The murder of Basil seems to just happen spontaneously with no obvious build up and no real reason for the violence is described or provided apart from his irritation over Basil's moralising about his lifestyle and the scandal he is causing.
What I did enjoy was the descriptive sections and the atmosphere of Victorian London that was very reminiscent of Conan Doyle in places. Ultimately I found the final section the most satisfying part of the book; where something finally happened.
I would not rush to read another Oscar Wilde however. I think I'll stick with more pacey; and dare I say it, less pretentious classics such as Dickens and Hardy.

Instead Oscar Wilde spends pages and pages describing fabrics, nearly feel asleep at this point.
The rest of the book was great, I loved the dialogue, especially Sir Henry. And as for the murder of Basil, I don't think I have ever read anything as brutal and quick, fantastic stuff. Just one little bit of violence right in the middle of the book, very well done.

1. Orchids are mentioned repeatedly throughout the book. Is there som..."
At first I thought I missed the bit about the orchids. But Lisa's reaction reminded me that there is indeed a mention of orchids. Found some links on the internet, as the Victorians had a flower language.
http://thelanguageofflowers.com/
http://www.orchid-society-gb.org.uk/N...
http://www.teleflora.com/orchids/flow...
Things to consider:
1. Did you like the book?
2. Did you like or dislike the main characters?
3. Do the characters develop?
4. What did you think of the plot and the ending of the story?
5. Do you have any particular favourite quotes or scenes?
6. Would you read anything else by this author?