30 Days of Book Talk discussion
Day 10: A Book You Want to Be Talked Into or Out of Reading
date
newest »


There are several works of philosophy that I haven’t ever read. But I feel they should be studied and understood. And I think my cursory knowledge of them is sufficient for me at this time.
So apart from the books I named in the first paragraph and many other sacred texts and mythology that I want to understand, what I really like to be talked into and be encouraged to read, study and fully understand are physics and advanced mathematics.





I’d like to be talked out of reading some of the sillier “To Marry a Handsome Duke” novels that are my guilty pleasure.


My mother's tried to talk me into Middlemarch on several occasions, but I'm still afraid of George Eliot.

I love Lord of the Rings but - if it didn't hook you when you were younger, and you've seen the movies, I really don't see any reason to make yourself read it.

Okay, I’ll try: Middlemarch and Mill on the Floss are wonderful, two of my favorite books ever, and I read them voluntarily as an adult. Don’t be afraid! (I’m wondering if maybe you first tried Silas Marner, Because I started that book assuming I love but I couldn’t get much past the first chapter. Tried a couple times.)

Mark wrote: "I have felt for a while like I should probably read the Chernow Alexander Hamilton - inspiration for the hit Broadway musical, etc. - but it's 818 pages and I don't think that I actually want to read that long of a biography and I'd really just like to feel that I'm absolved if I keep on skipping it."
Heh. Might want to stay clear of David McCullough's Truman then. It's 1100 pages in paperback with another 100 pages of notes and bibliography. It's actually a fantastic read, but I had to read it in chunks, say a chapter a week or so.
Two Envelopes and a Phone wrote: "Talked into? Probably War and Peace or Terry Pratchett.
Talked out of? Probably Terry Pratchett or War and Peace."
Terry Pratchett is funny, and the books are short! Lots of people love his writing to death. I haven't so far (only read a couple) but even I admit that they're a good time.
War and Peace is pretty great, despite its reputation as a giant tome. The characters are complicated and interesting, and the chapters are short, often as short as just a couple of pages, so it doesn't feel like a slog. It's not long due to long-windedness but because a lot happens in it; the pace is actually fairly quick. I recommend the Ann Dunnigan translation if you do decide to read it (and in English) - it's more modern than some, keeps the original names where other editions stupidly translate them into English, and also translates all the French dialogue, which believe it or not, not every edition does.
Talked out of? Probably Terry Pratchett or War and Peace."
Terry Pratchett is funny, and the books are short! Lots of people love his writing to death. I haven't so far (only read a couple) but even I admit that they're a good time.
War and Peace is pretty great, despite its reputation as a giant tome. The characters are complicated and interesting, and the chapters are short, often as short as just a couple of pages, so it doesn't feel like a slog. It's not long due to long-windedness but because a lot happens in it; the pace is actually fairly quick. I recommend the Ann Dunnigan translation if you do decide to read it (and in English) - it's more modern than some, keeps the original names where other editions stupidly translate them into English, and also translates all the French dialogue, which believe it or not, not every edition does.
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "Most of Vanity Fair isn't set during the Napoleonic wars, btw, but largely in the years afterwards. It's also extremely funny.
I love Lord of the Rings but - if it didn't hook you when you were yo..."
Thanks! Funny is good. When I was a kid it wasn't that I wasn't interested in Lord of the Rings, just that I read it when I was really too young, and I took all the dire foreshadowing at face value, assumed all the characters were going to die, and quit. It just seems like such a gap in my reading now!
As far as Middlemarch goes, like Ange I read it voluntarily as an adult, and I was pretty impressed by it. Eliot is definitely not a writer for kids, and I don't think Silas Marner is the kind of story that would appeal to kids, so I'm not surprised you hated it at 15. A lot of it is observation on human nature. Middlemarch is also a much more complicated and ambitious book than Silas Marner.
I love Lord of the Rings but - if it didn't hook you when you were yo..."
Thanks! Funny is good. When I was a kid it wasn't that I wasn't interested in Lord of the Rings, just that I read it when I was really too young, and I took all the dire foreshadowing at face value, assumed all the characters were going to die, and quit. It just seems like such a gap in my reading now!
As far as Middlemarch goes, like Ange I read it voluntarily as an adult, and I was pretty impressed by it. Eliot is definitely not a writer for kids, and I don't think Silas Marner is the kind of story that would appeal to kids, so I'm not surprised you hated it at 15. A lot of it is observation on human nature. Middlemarch is also a much more complicated and ambitious book than Silas Marner.

As for Lord of the Rings books. I would always recommend them. They may seem very, very slow. Peter Jackson did a brilliant job, I think his works are among the very best film adaptations of all time but still, the books are something else. They’re pure magic. Of course I have your exact same feeling about War and Peace, I plodded through it in French, it was the first year I had graduated to non shortened books, so I didn’t really understand parts of it and I wasn’t drawn enough to reread it. Then I saw the film and felt I didn’t need to.
Ulysses is an experience. I read somewhere that Rothko had said that art is not about making people see an experience, it, in itself should be an experience. (I’m paraphrasing).
I first read it without even knowing what it was, and that is what I recommend for the first time to anyone. It feels presumptuous to talk about it when English literature isn’t even my field of study. But I think that first shock of discovery stays with one for ever, even if one doesn’t understand all the layers. I was so confused the first time that at one point I started skimming and came to that last famous passage and then I started from the beginning. I know there are entire course based on this one book, and I like to one day attend one of them, but I only reread it later on with the help of the articles and things I searched in the internet myself as I didn’t find a copy of a companion book. There are layers and layers which intrigued me at first and I just wanted to see what it all meant. It felt and still feels like this great puzzle that you have to put together. It sometimes feels to me as if Joyce is making us live through life experiences and perceptions and influences that build up through a lifetime in order to give us a piece of a life. Of course I would be the last person to ask about this book because there is so much of it I have to learn and understand yet. But it is the most intriguing piece of literature I have ever tried, and on some level I even like that I haven’t had much structured help, because the journey of discovery feels like my own. Needless to say there is so much yet to go through and discover.

I have read Middlemarch twice. The beginning was good, particularly the texture of the prose. However it needed editing...it does tend to drag a bit in the middle, but those were the days of the 3-volume novel. What reads like page-filler was exactly that.

Well, if you want to be talked out of reading fluff, here goes. There is a time and a place for fluff--when you're tired, unwell, depressed etc. But if the author never leaves anything on the table--if you read a book and then two days later nothing you have read made any impression--maybe your brain wasn't impressed. Binge reading is like binge eating--you end up feeling hung over and have nothing to show for it. I find if I read too many books by the same author in a row, it all gets a bit same old, and I no longer enjoy them, where if I space them out a bit with other stuff the enjoyment remains.

I tried War and Peace in high school, it was on my parallel reading list and I was far too young for it at 15. They were showing that hugely popular TV series with Audrey Hepburn at the time, and it was my first real encounter with the difference between the base text and the director's vision. I ended up making lists of all those nicknames, after the librarian was kind enough to point out that Mikhail-Misha-Michel were all the same person, etc.

Thank you. You’re absolutely right. I yell similar things to myself when I feel overwhelmed by life and start binge reading and eating! If only it were so easy to be talked out of compulsions!
Books mentioned in this topic
War and Peace (other topics)Middlemarch (other topics)
War and Peace (other topics)
Truman (other topics)
The City in the Middle of the Night (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Charlie Jane Anders (other topics)Ernest Hemingway (other topics)
Virginia Woolf (other topics)
A couple I feel like I should read, but am not as excited about as I’d like:
The Lord of the Rings. I’ve never actually read this in its entirety: I first tried it when too young and found it too depressing, and then when I tried again as an adult, it didn’t click. I did enjoy the movies and feel like I should read the book, but now it doesn’t help that I know everything that’s going to happen, and have read a lot of other books inspired by it that seem tailored to push my buttons better.
Vanity Fair. I’m not sure if I should read this one at all. I’m interested in the Napoleonic Wars era setting, but concerned that it sounds kind of misogynistic. Given its length, it’s quite a commitment for something I'm not excited about.