The Obscure Reading Group discussion
Logistics
>
In-Between Books Chat Area
message 251:
by
Kathleen
(new)
Apr 23, 2021 06:48AM

reply
|
flag

So far, we have 8 books nominated, and "eclectic" is the collective word for them.
I still haven't decided on my own nomination, but I have two days left, a few possibilities, and a few red herrings to fish out.
Thanks to the first 8 nominators and, to those still thinking, good luck with it!
I still haven't decided on my own nomination, but I have two days left, a few possibilities, and a few red herrings to fish out.
Thanks to the first 8 nominators and, to those still thinking, good luck with it!

Bionic Jean wrote: "I liked the look of one of the previous nominations so much that I've nominated that one (as I'm allowed) :) Of course Parkinson's Law dictated that just today I discovered a "lost" novel by one of..."
You can always switch your nomination, Jean, if you feel strongly about it. I'm not putting the titles up until Monday morning, so it's as easy as crossing off one and entering another.
Take that, Parkinson (& In-Laws)!
You can always switch your nomination, Jean, if you feel strongly about it. I'm not putting the titles up until Monday morning, so it's as easy as crossing off one and entering another.
Take that, Parkinson (& In-Laws)!


Wonderful!
I'll join in the voting and will read the next selection.
Though I missed our last discussion, I am relieved that this extraordinary academic year (with its unusual headstart from spring 2020) is coming to a close. Though I'll teach one class over the summer, I'll have so much more time for you all.
I'm looking forward to all of the books!
I'm looking forward to conversations with all of you!
Bionic Jean wrote: "Thanks Ken! Having looked closer I'm not really sure it would have much appeal as a group read though, so will stick with the one I've sent :)"
OK, no problem!
OK, no problem!
Jan wrote: "Kathleen wrote: "Oh boy--time to nominate! I love trying to come up with an obscure book that is still hopefully widely library-accessible, and can't wait to see what we come up with. This group is..."
It'll be great to have you back in the fold, Jan. So glad the arduous year (Covid + School = Challenges!) is winding down for you!
It'll be great to have you back in the fold, Jan. So glad the arduous year (Covid + School = Challenges!) is winding down for you!
The JUNE poll is up, and it's a handful -- 17 titles. Take your time exploring and thinking before voting. You have today, tomorrow, and Wednesday to decide.
By Thursday morning, the dust should settle leaving ONE winning title. I look forward to it, as we have classics, philosophy, poetry, and contemporary to look over!
By Thursday morning, the dust should settle leaving ONE winning title. I look forward to it, as we have classics, philosophy, poetry, and contemporary to look over!
Glad you're here, Darrin. Hope others come by, too.
In the past, when sending out polls, they've immediately appeared in both the GR messages and home emails. This time, nothing. Nada. Crickets. So I sent a SECOND invite to the poll.
Maybe they'll both arrive some time today. GR begins to resemble the United States Postal Service in that sense.
In the past, when sending out polls, they've immediately appeared in both the GR messages and home emails. This time, nothing. Nada. Crickets. So I sent a SECOND invite to the poll.
Maybe they'll both arrive some time today. GR begins to resemble the United States Postal Service in that sense.

It really is a tempting list - will those not chosen be added to the reserve list? I'm so tempted to vote for one I didn't nominate ...
Bionic Jean wrote: "My email notifications are incredibly slow at the moment and usually I find I've replied to something ages before the notification arrives! In this case I've got one of your messages, Ken, but have..."
Oh, good. I'm glad it's only me not getting notifications about the poll. Maybe I forgot to check a box called "send to self as well" or something.
I do move all the "losers" to a thread in the Logistics folder of our group -- the one with a long name. Something or other about being nominated but not chosen. That way people can read interesting picks that didn't win on their own, if they wish. (Note, too, that two of the past "losers" have been nominated again for June in this poll. Déjà, meet vu!)
Tempted to vote for one you didn't nominate? I almost always do. And this time, as once or twice before, I didn't bother nominating a title, as the list looked rich enough as it was (read: plenty of butter and cream already).
Oh, good. I'm glad it's only me not getting notifications about the poll. Maybe I forgot to check a box called "send to self as well" or something.
I do move all the "losers" to a thread in the Logistics folder of our group -- the one with a long name. Something or other about being nominated but not chosen. That way people can read interesting picks that didn't win on their own, if they wish. (Note, too, that two of the past "losers" have been nominated again for June in this poll. Déjà, meet vu!)
Tempted to vote for one you didn't nominate? I almost always do. And this time, as once or twice before, I didn't bother nominating a title, as the list looked rich enough as it was (read: plenty of butter and cream already).
Goodreads notifications still seem to be sporadic, but I think I got your notice right away, Ken.
Wow--what a selection! I was happy to see some previous nominees. I've only read (and loved) two, and many of the others I'd be very excited to read,
Wow--what a selection! I was happy to see some previous nominees. I've only read (and loved) two, and many of the others I'd be very excited to read,

Kathleen wrote: "Goodreads notifications still seem to be sporadic, but I think I got your notice right away, Ken.
Wow--what a selection! I was happy to see some previous nominees. I've only read (and loved) two, ..."
Thanks for verifying, Kathleen. Agreed re: the list. I still have to go through it and read up on all of them. For now, I was just busy pulling up links and creating the poll. First things first, as the chicken told the egg (...or was it the egg told the chicken?).
Wow--what a selection! I was happy to see some previous nominees. I've only read (and loved) two, ..."
Thanks for verifying, Kathleen. Agreed re: the list. I still have to go through it and read up on all of them. For now, I was just busy pulling up links and creating the poll. First things first, as the chicken told the egg (...or was it the egg told the chicken?).
Matthew wrote: "I've had some difficulties with the notifications too. I was ill yesterday and never managed to send off anything for the poll but the choices made by everyone else look great. Glad to be going int..."
Sorry you've been under the weather. In the Age of Covid, innocent remarks like "I felt ill" take on added concern, that's for sure! We wonder if we'll ever achieve herd immunity now given the momentum-killing pause caused by J&J's single shot and the political assault on science caused by...well, I best be kind and not get into descriptors.
Sorry you've been under the weather. In the Age of Covid, innocent remarks like "I felt ill" take on added concern, that's for sure! We wonder if we'll ever achieve herd immunity now given the momentum-killing pause caused by J&J's single shot and the political assault on science caused by...well, I best be kind and not get into descriptors.



Diane wrote: "I am "fully vaccinated" which here means two shots and a two week period after the 2nd one. Never heard of one being given in the thigh Jean. I got my notice first thing this morning Ken, but other..."
Yeah, some I'd rather read more than others, but I'm happy to read whichever choice wins because, you know what, sometimes books you don't think you'll like can surprise you.
Believe it or not, Ripley, there is only ONE book on this list that I've read already -- Père Goriot -- and that was so long ago it would be like reading it new.
So, yeah. Win-win no matter what surfaces Thursday morning.
Yeah, some I'd rather read more than others, but I'm happy to read whichever choice wins because, you know what, sometimes books you don't think you'll like can surprise you.
Believe it or not, Ripley, there is only ONE book on this list that I've read already -- Père Goriot -- and that was so long ago it would be like reading it new.
So, yeah. Win-win no matter what surfaces Thursday morning.

Carol wrote: "https://youtu.be/PDJ_Mz8ftqI"
I know it shows my age, but I heart Carly Simon. And too bad video wasn't around when Ponce de Léon was. It can be, like nothing else, the Fountain of Youth!
I know it shows my age, but I heart Carly Simon. And too bad video wasn't around when Ponce de Léon was. It can be, like nothing else, the Fountain of Youth!
Yvonne has kindly pointed out that one book on our list, Not Forgetting the Whale, has been reissued with the title The Whale at the End of the World.
When I tried to change it in the poll, though, it showed that I already had the book (despite the title difference). I could delete one and add the other, but fear it may toss votes, so I'll leave it as is.
Be sure, on any of these titles, to click "additional titles," especially in the case of translations and different publishers.
When I tried to change it in the poll, though, it showed that I already had the book (despite the title difference). I could delete one and add the other, but fear it may toss votes, so I'll leave it as is.
Be sure, on any of these titles, to click "additional titles," especially in the case of translations and different publishers.
VOTING UPDATE: DAY 2 of 3
On Day One, we garnered 24 votes.
If you haven't already, please VOTE.
As of now, we have a five-way tie for first place, with two titles tied just one vote behind the leaders of the pack.
Meaning: Every vote counts!
(But you knew that.)
On Day One, we garnered 24 votes.
If you haven't already, please VOTE.
As of now, we have a five-way tie for first place, with two titles tied just one vote behind the leaders of the pack.
Meaning: Every vote counts!
(But you knew that.)
Carol wrote: "https://youtu.be/PDJ_Mz8ftqI"
Ahhhh ... Carly! And she's barefoot! Those were the good old days. Thanks, Carol.
Ahhhh ... Carly! And she's barefoot! Those were the good old days. Thanks, Carol.

Alison.
I'm still holding off but fast approaching the date, later this week, when Calvino and I meet. Brushing up on my Italian, I am (even though he was born in Cuba, of all places).

Welcome to the new members!
More are coming to this group faster and faster, and I'm looking forward to what you all will contribute.
Off I go to Sunday morning chores and school preparations for summer.
With a smile,
Jan

Hello, Alison,
Yes, his tone and broken fourth wall create such a wonderful, intimate "aha, I know you!" I laughed imagining myself in many of the scenarios he set up. Some of those are completely foreign to me, but then I think, "Ah, but I'd love to try reading -- or doing anything at all -- in that situation."
Back to my morning tasks I go.
Enjoy what comes today.
Jan

Alison wrote: "So...thought I'd take a sneak peek at next month's read. Eventually found an online copy in an obscure archive and read the first seven pages. How come this author, who I have never heard of before..."
Reading your comments this morning made me realize just how excited I am to have someone to talk to about Calvino, lots of someones! This is certainly a book for book-lovers if ever there was one.
"I am here--and everyone is in some "here"--and the only thing we can do is try to communicate with one another." -- Czeslaw Milsoz, 1969

https://www.theguardian.com/books/202...

https://www.theguardian.com/books/202......"
Wow, I hope they do.
Me, too, though I really should get around to Cannery Row and Tortilla Flat first (makes mental note for summer TBR tower).


Sue wrote: "I still haven’t read him. Someday."
Wow. Amazing you ran the gauntlet of the American school system without being assigned a Steinbeck.
On another note (middle C, for warming up), I started the Calvino today. Middle-C is for "Clever."
Wow. Amazing you ran the gauntlet of the American school system without being assigned a Steinbeck.
On another note (middle C, for warming up), I started the Calvino today. Middle-C is for "Clever."


The Calvino was interesting and clever in the beginning, and now it is plodding, but I have made it to Chapter Six, which is quite a bit further than I got the first time I tried. It is so complicated that I am hoping I don't forget everything I have read before the discussion begins.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Stone Raft (other topics)The Case of Comrade Tulayev (other topics)
The Case of Comrade Tulayev (other topics)
The Case of Comrade Tulayev (other topics)
The Stone Raft (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Iris Murdoch (other topics)Claudia Piñeiro (other topics)
Claudia Piñeiro (other topics)
Magda Szabó (other topics)
Isak Dinesen (other topics)
More...