College Students! discussion
Past Discussions of Group Reads
>
Dracula--For Those Who Have Finished
date
newest »

Did any of you who have read this book have to read it for school? Do you think it was helpful to have read it in class versus on your own? I've heard opinions both ways. Some people found it valuable to learn about it and discuss it and others didn't enjoy it as much because they were dissecting it.




I also found a graphic novel edition in the kids' section of B&N, and of course I bought it. It's actually remarkably close to the novel, and the illustrations make it that much better. They are a bit cartoonish but I definitely enjoyed them.

1) Who remembers the "nursing" scene? You know, when Dracula cuts open his chest and makes Mina drink his blood?
2) Let's talk about Lucy's vampire death, when her fiance had to ram a stake through her heart (PENETRATION, anyone??). That was a big moment in the slaying, but then they kind of glossed over the rest of it. You know, the part when they cut off her head and stuffed her mouth full of garlic.
And I know I'm being silly here, but they are pretty common interpretations of the scenes.

I suggest that anyone that loved Dracula, that they should read the
The Historian. It is a long book, but it is fantastic and it is centered around Dracula! It is on the top of my list for books that I have read!
I finished a little while ago, but thought I would share my thoughts. I loved the book. I wasn't required to read it in school but had always thought it would be a really creepy great read.
I wasn't creeped out, and I didn't see any of the "overly sexualized scenes" that so many people talk about. I actually found it to be much less erotic that I expected the "original" vampire book to be.
A few things that made me go Hmmmm.....
1. Van Helsing the doctor. Didn't a movie come out awhile back called Van Helsing and the title character fought vampires? Funny.
2. The Count controlled wolves, and they were his followers. Normally wolves are explained as being the enemies of vampires, so that really surprised me. (and no, not just in Twilight)
3. I was wondering the reason for including Quincey. His character didn't really fit with the others.
4. My sister used to watch the movie all the time, and I think I may have sat through it once, but I couldn't get Keanu Reeves face out of my head when I read the parts of Jonathan. :)
Side note: the other day at the toy store, I noticed a book called Dracula, the Un-Dead and was written by Dacre Stoker a direct decendent of Bram and a "dracula historian". It said it was a sequel to the original. Has anyone read it? Heard good or bad?
I wasn't creeped out, and I didn't see any of the "overly sexualized scenes" that so many people talk about. I actually found it to be much less erotic that I expected the "original" vampire book to be.
A few things that made me go Hmmmm.....
1. Van Helsing the doctor. Didn't a movie come out awhile back called Van Helsing and the title character fought vampires? Funny.
2. The Count controlled wolves, and they were his followers. Normally wolves are explained as being the enemies of vampires, so that really surprised me. (and no, not just in Twilight)
3. I was wondering the reason for including Quincey. His character didn't really fit with the others.
4. My sister used to watch the movie all the time, and I think I may have sat through it once, but I couldn't get Keanu Reeves face out of my head when I read the parts of Jonathan. :)
Side note: the other day at the toy store, I noticed a book called Dracula, the Un-Dead and was written by Dacre Stoker a direct decendent of Bram and a "dracula historian". It said it was a sequel to the original. Has anyone read it? Heard good or bad?

As for the sexualized scenes, I'm pretty sure I talked about them earlier in the thread. They're not racy, but there is a lot of subtext and symbolism.

I have to agree with Candace - this really IS creepy. I'll admit to be a bit too impressionable, and as I read it every night before going to bed... I too was afraid to fall asleep! Silly, I know.
Tami - I don't understand what was with Quincey either. Ok, so they needed someone who was good at "action"? They could have given that characteristic to Arthur, he didn't do much except for being engaged to Lucy.
Remfield confused me too because I couldn't quite connect him with Dracula; I don't even understand how they drew the conclusion that they were connected, maybe I should have read it more attentively.
And I didn't get why Dracula met them in daylight once? What was the purpose in that meeting? I also would have liked to know why he went to London in first place, and thought it more interesting when he was present (Lucy, etc) than later parts of the book when the party was looking for them.
A really good book nevertheless.

I guess I missed much of the sexual innuendo but now thinking back, I can see some of it.

Did you like or dislike the book? Did you like the ending? Favorite characters? Favorite quotes? Did you like the author's style? Were you confused by anything in the book? etc.