Never too Late to Read Classics discussion

This topic is about
The Ox-Bow Incident
Archive FWC
>
2022 FWC: Jan-Mar: The Ox-Bow Incident
date
newest »




I went through a relatively brief, but intense western phase in my younger days (Louis L'Amour, Luke Short, Ernest Haycox, Max Brand, etc.). Without getting spoilery, I’ll just say (based on my viewing of the movie) that The Ox-Bow Incident doesn’t share a lot in common with those early westerns I digested. Given the themes it explores, it might even be described as an anti-western.



Its hard to believe this was a debut novel, and that the author only wrote three more books, and a few books of poetry. So my advice is, make the best of what's available and read this book.
I rated it 4 stars, and was close to making it 5 - something I do very infrequently.
Canavan I thought someone had.
I will check it out. Not sure if I want to see it first or after reading.
Do you have a thought on that?
I will check it out. Not sure if I want to see it first or after reading.
Do you have a thought on that?

Do you have a thought on that?
I’m not sure if I have a real strong opinion on that matter. I will say that I probably preferred movie to book, if only because the movie is slightly less depressing.
My thought is does the movie help with the reading or does it not matter at all.
I sometimes like either way better.
When a book is difficult for me seeing the movie first might help in my head for the reading purposes. If that makes sense.
I sometimes like either way better.
When a book is difficult for me seeing the movie first might help in my head for the reading purposes. If that makes sense.
I generally read the book first, since sometimes changes are made for the film.
In this case, the writing is so powerful I think that watching the movie first would make it lose some of its power. The author packs a punch!
But not having seen the movie, I don't know if it would make a difference.
In this case, the writing is so powerful I think that watching the movie first would make it lose some of its power. The author packs a punch!
But not having seen the movie, I don't know if it would make a difference.

It seems like it’s the crossover time between (western) vigilante justice and true law. It is a dicey time in a place where the law isn’t widespread or fast enough.
I don’t despise every character, or even most of them. I like this rebuttal by Art to young Tetley’s philosophical rant, “You kind of take it for granted nobody else is a smart as you are, don’t you, kid?” So far I’m enjoying Art’s perspective and his thoughtful consideration of the ramifications of this group’s movements. He seems to be the classic “man of few words” at this point, observing the expected behavior that he and Gil should follow as outsiders in this group.

It seems like it’s the crossover time between (western) vigilan..."
Those are good points Liane, and my feelings towards some of the characters have mellowed....slightly....as time has passed since I finished the book. Although, as Rosemarie said - it's a book that's not easily forgotten.
It has a powerful ending and I hope you'll let us know your reaction to that.

Hard book to rate, due to its content. It's a short book, and the build up of tension in the story is continuous and effective. The level of description was good, not too much, and appropriate for a "western", with the characters believable and true in that time/genre. The story was much more about the psychology of the choices (or lack of choices) made by the characters, and again, it felt true to me. Art Croft as narrator provided an insight into his motivations as a thoughtful, seemingly rational, slow to act or judge cowboy pulled along by events. If his (and others) lack of resistance to the horrible outcomes was partly due to being subordinate (employees?) or an outsider, what does that suggest about the current environment today? Is this a recurring theme?
I have to think on this more. There are characters I do despise, and others with whom I sympathize (Art especially), which is a curious response that I need to consider.

And I think making some of the characters hard to like helped strengthen the theme of people acting as a group rather than thinking individuals.
Group thinking happened a lot during that time. It was a way of protecting yourself as well.
Thank you Natalie for sharing.
Thank you Natalie for sharing.


I finished this up the other day.
Clark's style in this book makes you really think about how this could have happened. What men think. How other men influence their decisions. Who is easily persuaded to go with the majority and in the end when regret kicks in for some for not standing up and taking a firm stance. 4 stars.
Clark's style in this book makes you really think about how this could have happened. What men think. How other men influence their decisions. Who is easily persuaded to go with the majority and in the end when regret kicks in for some for not standing up and taking a firm stance. 4 stars.
Books mentioned in this topic
Now in November (other topics)True Grit (other topics)
The Ox-Bow Incident (other topics)
The Ox-Bow Incident (other topics)
The Ox-Bow Incident (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Louis L'Amour (other topics)Luke Short (other topics)
Ernest Haycox (other topics)
Max Brand (other topics)
Oliver Strange (other topics)
More...
Clark was an American novelist, short story writer, and educator. He ranks as one of Nevada's most distinguished literary figures of the 20th century, and was the first inductee into the 'Nevada Writers Hall of Fame' in 1988.
A 1940 western novel, The Ox-Bow Incident takes place in 1885, and begins with two cowboys, Art Croft and Gil Carter, riding into the town of Bridger's Wells. They go into Canby's Saloon and find the atmosphere is tense, partly due to recent incidents of cattle rustling. News is brought that a local named Kinkaid has been...
It was Clark's first published novel.
In 1943, the novel was adapted into an Academy Award-nominated movie of the same name, directed by William A. Wellman and starring Henry Fonda and Harry Morgan.
This read is part of the FWC: Quarterly Reads anyone considering joining in on this Classic?