SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
Members' Chat
>
is it still about the author, or is it about the title?
date
newest »

As a relatively unknown author, I figure the title of my books would grab the reader before my name would, so I try to come up with a good one and make it the most prominent thing on the cover.

I was once told my name was too prominent on the cover of my book. While I was surprised to hear that, I stuck with it. My title was still bigger than my name so...

Last time I was in a bricks-and-mortar bookstore (before Borders shut down), it seemed like most of the books were George RR Martin, Robert Jordan, JRR Tolkein, and other big names. If that's less the case now, that's encouraging that maybe some newer, fresher voices are becoming available.

Until that point, though, it rests heavily on the title to draw in readers by being both attractive and intriguing.

Agreed.
And an intriguing cover does wonders, too.

I'd read it.

If you make your name almost as large as the title - in other words really bold, perhaps people will think they should have heard of the author and therefore be more interested. A tiny name suggests a timid indie, afraid to mix it with the big boys (and girls).



Wobbly Chair Leg was an awesome read! Wait, I might have remembered the title wrong, because the author name was so big on the cover. What was it again? Oh yes, The Shinning. Starred a kid named Bart I think.
But on a more serious note, yes I believe the generally accepted wisdom is that a big name means a big name. A not so big name author would have the title more obvious. Perhaps what you observe is a lot of newer authors getting a look in? I have not heard such reported, but you never know!
Regardless, I think the concept of branding is a useful one for all writers. But an unknown writer needs the name to be there for the reader to check out after being convinced by a good read to check out their other work. That author's name will not be as important as a marketing thing when that cover space could be catching eyes in other ways. A reader looking for Mr King's work has already been sold on it, and simply needs to see the brand to buy.
As a new writer I learned the hard way that searchability of the title is the paramount concern. I write thrillers set in the Napoleonic Wars so I have to attract that reading group and by my third novel I realised the title must reflect the subject to snare browsers of sites such as Amazon
Maybe we should start a club of dreamy, hopeful authors with small letter names.


VW sells pretty well.




I doubt there's much cogitation at this point. His name is prominent because that is the thing that catches people's eye and gets them to pick it up.

I doubt there's much cogitation at this point. His name is prominent because that is the thing that catches people's eye and gets them to pick it up. "
Agreed, Becky.
It doesn't matter what the marketing department thinks or what they make...
If Ilona Andrews wrote it, I'm buying it. Her name could be in teeny, tiny letters only on the spine and the name of the book could be "writing." So, marketing may made the decision as to what the cover looks like...But the reader makes the decision to buy big name(d) writers for a reason...and that reason has nothing to do with the size of the author's name on the cover.
In the reverse, new (or new to me)(NTM) authors have not built that trust with readers. The reader has no clue as to the quality of the writing of a new/NTM author - readers aren't just going to slap down money for an unknown. So those authors need to have a catchy title, a nice cover and an interesting blurb.


I'm there.
When does it come out?

Are people starting to be more interested in titles than actual author’s names? We have seen an explosion of book series over the last ten years. Do you actually need your name to sell a book or is it about the title these days.