2025 Reading Challenge discussion

This topic is about
Disorientation
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE 2024
>
Disorientation
date
newest »


The summary on Goodreads says both “uproarious” and “hilarious” but I have yet to hear any of that going on.

I do agree this is a tricky question. I've read stories of writers being severely criticised for trying to say that as a writer, they feel they should be able to tell any story, even ones about people whose backgrounds they have no direct experience of. Perhaps that's why fantasy is so popular: you can imagine your characters in any world and any situation and no one can say you're being inauthentic.
I think for academics, it's a little easier. You can be an expert in a field you have no direct experience in and not attract very much criticism. However, an institution like Barnes would probably attract a lot of criticism for not having a lot of diversity in say, its East Asian Studies department, even if every individual working there is a world-class expert in the field.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Pages: 403 pages
Length: 1 month (May)
Participants: Rebecca, Jen
Everyone reads at their own pace during a Buddy Read. Because participants can be at different parts of the book at different times, it is extremely important to mark spoilers so that the book is not ruined for someone who is not as far along as others!!!
Mark spoilers by placing {spoiler} before the text and {/spoiler} after the text but use the < and > instead of the { and }.