Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

29 views
Book & Author Page Issues > Romeo & Juliet versions combined when shouldn't have been?

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Emily (new)

Emily | 2 comments I'm not a goodreads librarian. Just wanted to point out that somehow Romeo & Juliet (the original play, which I read and rated) got grouped in/combined with Shakespeare's Romeo & Juliet (the manga version, which I have not read and not rated, though now it appears as though I have).


message 2: by Cait (new)

Cait (tigercait) | 4988 comments Thanks for spotting that, Emily! I've split all of the graphic novelizations out. If you spot any more, please let us know!


message 3: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Don't we usually move the graphic novelist to primary author position to prevent further confusion?


message 4: by Cait (new)

Cait (tigercait) | 4988 comments rivka wrote: "Don't we usually move the graphic novelist to primary author position to prevent further confusion?"

Mmph, yes. I have to run, but perhaps someone else would like to tackle this?


message 5: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 31414 comments Got 'em. One of them said original publishing date was 1602 rather than 2008.

Should I delete that?


message 6: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Heh. Yes!


message 7: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 31414 comments Thats what I thought. I'll go do it now.


message 8: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 31414 comments All better now.


back to top