Book Rabit Hole discussion

The List of Suspicious Things was a compelling read full of context and rich in themes. One theme centred throughough the book is the black and white binaries as a way of framing the world. There is them and us”, right vs wrong, good vs bad, belonging vs exclusion. And you’re right—this might reflect both the time period (when social norms were more rigid) and Miv’s childlike worldview, which naturally leans toward absolutes.

Them and Us - Outsiders like Omar/Mr Bashir and Ishtiaq are never fully embraced, even when they show kindness or generosity. Even the grief gathering organised by Valerie and Mr Bashir at the end highlights who still “belongs” and who doesn’t—some people come, some don’t, and the social boundaries remain.

Right and Wrong - It’s “right” to stay with your husband, even if he’s abusive; “wrong” to divorce and become one of those women. There’s a moral code in the community, but it’s one rooted in judgement and conformity, not compassion.

Good and Bad - Through Miv’s eyes, people are often split into “goodies” and “baddies,” with little room for the messy middle ground where most people actually live.

Did the book feel too binary at times—too divided into right/wrong, good/bad, insider/outsider? Or did you see hints of complexity under the surface?

Do you think this reflects the era (1970s Yorkshire), where social norms were more rigid, or is it mostly Miv’s young perspective simplifying the world?