Let's talk about Paul Auster discussion

Just finished Invisible. Very readable Auster. Many surprises and plot twists.

Trying to get together some discussion on this or other Auster books. Join in.

Having read only four of Auster's novels, I can't count myself qualified to rank his novels in any way, but of those few that I HAVE read (Man in the Dark, The Brooklyn Follies, Invisible, and Travels in the Scriptorium), this is probably my favorite. Immediately after finishing Man in the Dark, I thought it might have dethroned Invisible, but as the days have distanced us, I am feeling less enthusiastic about MID, and ever-more enthusiastic about Invisible.

I read Mr Vertigo in the mid-90s - still one of the best books I have ever read

if you like Auster, his wife's work is very similar - Siri Hustvedt

Jack wrote: "Just finished Invisible. Very readable Auster. Many surprises and plot twists.

Trying to get together some discussion on this or other Auster books. Join in."

I read a review that saw invisible as the last part of a trilogy because the previous books were about old men (Man in the dark, Travels in the scriptorium)
I am not convinced. Invisible seems to be more about 1967. What do you think?