The Classics discussion
Breakfast at Tiffanys
>
The Movie
date
newest »

message 1:
by
theduckthief
(new)
Feb 05, 2010 05:19PM

reply
|
flag
Yes he was. He didn't think Hepburn's wholesome image would work with Holly's character and he was right. In the movie you never hear the word prostitute and there's only the slightest hint about what she does for a living. Monroe I think would have brought more depth to the role. The only reason I re-watch the movie is for Hepburn's wardrobe.

It was a strange reading experience, reading the dialog and picturing the movie and then trying to picture the movie with Marilyn Monroe instead. LOL So odd.
I agree the whole feel of the movie was different than the book. All of the characters were much 'harder' to me. Holly being more of a true prostitute character made the whole 'I'll do this because I've never done it before' attitude much less believable for me. I didn't really connect with the characters either and obviously some of that was due to my familiarity with the movie.
But I'm not sure I liked HollyoftheBook very much. I found it especially weird when all the Doc stuff occurred offscreen. The way she talked about that made her a much more callous character for me. I liked the movie's answer to the backstory for the narrator, in the book sometimes I would wonder why he was around. I was never sure if he liked HollyoftheBook very much either.
But, anyway, interesting read.