Bodice Ripper Readers Anonymous discussion
Discussions and Questions
>
Are you a skimmer or a read-every-word kind of person?
message 1:
by
Tonya
(new)
May 08, 2010 09:25PM

reply
|
flag



If an author gets wordy and there's lots of slow-moving crap around a minimal story (like what happened in a couple recent books I read), then I'll skim. But I don't like to. I'd rather toss a book and move onto something good than waste time skimming a bad one.
I prefer to read each word and it's usually easier if I have a chunk of time to read, instead of fits and starts. Choppy reading time makes for a more unsatisfactory read. :(
I prefer to read each word and it's usually easier if I have a chunk of time to read, instead of fits and starts. Choppy reading time makes for a more unsatisfactory read. :(
People skim read???? What? It never even occurred to me to do that! I used to do the speed reading thing in school for assigned reading but never ever in my pleasure reading! I am with Karla, I would rather toss a book for a good one that skim a bad one. I do occasionally skim ahead to see whats going on like you Tonya, but I pick right back up where I left off and read it word for word. I have been known to skim read the last chapter of a book before I get there if I am starting to doubt that the characters are heading towards an HEA. Sometimes I need a little assurance that everything is going to be ok :)



For me it depends on a whole lot of other things as well - is it a re-read or a new book? What else am I trying to do at the same time (ie cook supper, talk to my spouse, etc.), how tired I am, how bad my book ADD is, LOL!
I don't often get quiet, uninterrupted read time so I squeeze it in wherever I can.

And I just had a thought...if someone skims just for the good stuff, doesn't that sort of give a slant to any rating/review? *iz confuzzled*
I guess I'm OCD enough that I want to read every word, and sometimes I love a phrase or minor scene so much in itself that if I'd skimmed, I'd have missed it. :)
I guess I'm OCD enough that I want to read every word, and sometimes I love a phrase or minor scene so much in itself that if I'd skimmed, I'd have missed it. :)


I guess I'm OCD enough that I want to read every word, ..."
If I'm reading a really good book that truly holds my attention then I don't do much skimming if any at all. My skimming is not keeping me from reading the story and knowing the plot. It just keeps me from getting a few useless details or getting too hot and bothered during some of the graphic sex scenes. Any time I feel like I missed something I will go back and reread certain scenes more carefully. Sometimes the amount of skimming I do will affect the rating because I did little of it (higher rating) or a lot of it (lower rating).
Pamela(AllHoney) wrote: "Sometimes the amount of skimming I do will affect the rating because I did little of it (higher rating) or a lot of it (lower rating)."
That's what I was wondering about. Thanks for answering!
That's what I was wondering about. Thanks for answering!

For me, skimming has no significance in how I rate the book. If, for example, I'm reading the Conqueror and I'm reading a scene about Ceidre climbing the tree. It isn't really significant to the story IMO that I know what color the grass is- its just part of a set up to the scene.

I can see that. I'm sure you do still get the whole story and are able to form an opinion on the book if you skim a little. I've never thought to do that and I'm not sure if it would work out right for me. It is interesting how different people have different aproaches to reading. I think different people are able to absord books in different ways

Amen, Gigi!
The other benefit to reading this way is that you can pick the book up a year or so later and find new things in it. It's a different read every time, for me.

Gigi wrote: "It isn't really significant to the story IMO that I know what color the grass is- its just part of a set up to the scene."
Except, of course, if there's something slipped in about someone arriving on the scene and then all of a sudden I wonder how on earth they got there. That usually happens when I'm tired and reading, but not processing, and I wonder just how a scene got established. In the long run, it's easier for me to just read the whole thing rather than race through. Sort of like gunning it on the highway to gain, oooooh, a whole car-length. :P
Except, of course, if there's something slipped in about someone arriving on the scene and then all of a sudden I wonder how on earth they got there. That usually happens when I'm tired and reading, but not processing, and I wonder just how a scene got established. In the long run, it's easier for me to just read the whole thing rather than race through. Sort of like gunning it on the highway to gain, oooooh, a whole car-length. :P

Exactly Amanda!!!
Karla wrote: "Gigi wrote: "Except, of course, if there's something slipped in about someone arriving on the scene and then all of a sudden I wonder how on earth they got there..."
Cant say that I've ever had that problem. : ) Again, skimming isn't about skipping whole sentences or paragraphs. LOL Everyone processes things differently. The way I look at it is that there isn't any right way or wrong way to read anything. I simply do what works for me which may not work for someone else.
Yeah, because if I just let my eyes fly over paragraphs, grabbing words here and there, I end up with total word salad that doesn't make sense. :P

Danielle "The Book Huntress" wrote: "If I start skimming a book, then it's over."
That's sort of the switch that gets flipped with me, too. If a book isn't interesting enough to make me want to read it all, then my brain checks out and I just want it over with.
That's sort of the switch that gets flipped with me, too. If a book isn't interesting enough to make me want to read it all, then my brain checks out and I just want it over with.
This has been a very enlightening post for me! LOL I get the concept, like I said I learned how to speed read in school for assigned reading, I know you can get all the information that way and you will not miss anything..... but, but, but.... why not savor every word for pleasure reading? I am not trying to get information here, I am reading a story for fun! I guess I can see it, I just can not imagine ever chosing to do that myself!


I hear you, but I don't personally find reading less enjoyable because I'm not interested in the smaller details. I'm just anxious to get to the root of the story. I'm still enjoying the novel whether I skim or not.

I skim/speed read a lot of the time, and for me the first time I read a book is when I make a conscious effort to slow down and pay attention to the little details as much as my book ADD allows.
I've always wondered about "read every word" types - do you ever re-read, or did you read it so thoroughly the first time you have no desire to do it again?
Skim/speed readers, how about you?
Tammy wrote: "I've always wondered about "read every word" types - do you ever re-read, or did you read it so thoroughly the first time you have no desire to do it again?"
The only books I've ever been inclined to re-read are thick chunksters like John Jakes' North & South trilogy and Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series. Mainly because they're so full of history, details and characters that a re-read will reveal more that I missed the first time, even though I read every word. Plus the "little details" about most of those characters make me love them so much that I WANT to re-visit them (i.e., Cato in The October Horse).
For the usual 400-500 page romance, usually once is enough. And for stuff that's even shorter, once is definitely enough. If there's something that blows me away, I'm open to keeping it for a re-read. :)
The only books I've ever been inclined to re-read are thick chunksters like John Jakes' North & South trilogy and Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series. Mainly because they're so full of history, details and characters that a re-read will reveal more that I missed the first time, even though I read every word. Plus the "little details" about most of those characters make me love them so much that I WANT to re-visit them (i.e., Cato in The October Horse).
For the usual 400-500 page romance, usually once is enough. And for stuff that's even shorter, once is definitely enough. If there's something that blows me away, I'm open to keeping it for a re-read. :)

I do re-read, but usually only because I loved the book and its the equivalent for me of seeing a movie I liked more than once.
Gigi wrote: "Its funny how different things work for different people because I can't imagine reading every word- the, if, and, or, but, because"
And I can't imagine that skipping the, if, and, or, but, because saves that much time. :P
Jennefer summed up my feeling best: "I am not trying to get information here, I am reading a story for fun!"
But there are some readers who just want the highlights (or "need to know" stuff) of the story, and others who like the journey there. And I'm of the latter group.
And I can't imagine that skipping the, if, and, or, but, because saves that much time. :P
Jennefer summed up my feeling best: "I am not trying to get information here, I am reading a story for fun!"
But there are some readers who just want the highlights (or "need to know" stuff) of the story, and others who like the journey there. And I'm of the latter group.

Tammy wrote: "I'm curious - do all of you re-read favourite books or is once the only time? ..."
I always think I will re-read more than I actually do. I have re-read books like Anne of Green Gables and Kilmany of the Orchard that I read when I was a kid.... I dont think I have ever re-read anything I originaly read as an adult (but I always seem to hang onto them thinking one day I will LOL)
I always think I will re-read more than I actually do. I have re-read books like Anne of Green Gables and Kilmany of the Orchard that I read when I was a kid.... I dont think I have ever re-read anything I originaly read as an adult (but I always seem to hang onto them thinking one day I will LOL)

Same here. I say I'm going to re-read, but I usually end up picking a new book. My "keeper" shelf has about 11 books on it because I know my re-read rate is going to forever be low.
I tossed a bunch of books I was keeping for re-reads and it felt good. :D
I tossed a bunch of books I was keeping for re-reads and it felt good. :D


I sometimes feel as though the old, comfortably familiar book I've read, is more enjoyable than a boringly slow, new book. :D It's that *good book* predictability that keeps me hanging on for a dry spell. >:D

Except for long, purpley prose, gratuitous sex scenes that add absolutely nothing to the plot.
If I read a book a second time, then I do skim to the good parts. lol
I give it 100 pages(maybe a little more) If it's not working for me,I move on..life's too short and too many books on the TBR pile.

Yeah, same with me.


Ugh, I am indecisive about those books that are derpy approximately 50% through, then lil' nuggets of WTF to hold you over--or you're just dying for the characters to Stfu already, and want to close the book on their faces. lolXD

But sometimes with series books that I've been reading close together I will skim if the author does a long recap of previous books.
But really, if I'm skimming than I'm not enjoying it enough and will drop it for another.