Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
The Second Coming
2010 Group Read Discussions
>
7/10 The Second Coming - Main discussion - spoiler alert!!
date
newest »



I really did like the roles that the Church members played in the setting up of the events. The idea that a pope could birth the Beast was a nice touch.

blackrose, sorry you didn't find a character you could empathize with. They're all flawed (sometimes in a lot of ways) and my hope, despite the fact that it was difficult to tell where each person's loyalties resided, was that readers could find one that character resonated with them.




Yes. And with the Shift, the door is wide open for all kinds of things to change. More to come, I assure you. :)

blackrose wrote: "I like blurring the lines, and I like characters who are grey, and I like anti-heroes, and dark characters who are ultimately "good" in the context on the story... but I also like having at least o..."
I found that Friar John filled that role for me, especially as I got closer and closer to the end. His role at the end of the book had the most impact on me.
I found that Friar John filled that role for me, especially as I got closer and closer to the end. His role at the end of the book had the most impact on me.
David wrote: "I shifted a lot in points of view with this book, something that will continue in the remainder of the series. It can be a bit distracting for some. Is something that worked well with you or would ..."
This is something that works well for me. I like books that shift around; it keeps my brain from getting old and crusty. lol
This is something that works well for me. I like books that shift around; it keeps my brain from getting old and crusty. lol



I had a hard time keeping track of time with the shifts in this one. You'd follow certain people for a few days, then you'd jump to another group, and weeks had passed. It seemed to jump around oddly in that perspective.

No, not pointless - I guess they just didn't make that much of an impression on me.


I pretty much address things that I'm seeing on this thread. Overall it was an enjoyable read.

One problem I had was with the character Brahm. I adored her. In the first portion of the book, you described her as dark-skinned but then followed it up with a description of her skin being the color of buttermilk. I dont really think of buttermilk as dark so I imagined a cup of well creamed coffee although that left some questions as to how I should envision her. Was she of African descent or American Indian or Middle Eastern? Then in the last part of the book, her description changed to calling her black. Which is totally different from buttermilk as a color. It put a halt to the movie that was playing in my head (which I have to say you did a wonderful job of crafting) so that I could reconfigure how I saw a main character.
Another issue was with the ending. I wanted something stronger which at least hinted at what was to come and where we were headed in this. I also felt there were many plot points that were unanswered but since this is the first in a series, I hope to find my answers in the next books.
I felt discouraged from continuing on further in the series because many of the characters that I wanted to follow into further books were killed in the last chapter. It left less of a pull toward continuing although your writing is good enough that I want more.
I feel like all I did here was point out the bad when by far this would have been a 5 star read or even 5+ stars if I had not been so disappointed with the last chapter. This world you created is amazing and I want to see more of it!

Which of the characters were you most interested in?
As for buttermilk, it wasn't meant as a color. It was meant to describe the richness of her skin. Perhaps that didn't come across correctly.
David wrote: "Thanks Jason! I certainly hope the coming books will continue to engage you.
Which of the characters were you most interested in?
As for buttermilk, it wasn't meant as a color. It was meant to d..."
I'm with Jason on being confused about Brahm's skin color. When I was reading, I dismissed using buttermilk as a texture because it's sort of curdy and full of bits of clabbered milk. Not exactly a pleasant image for skin! LOL.
Which of the characters were you most interested in?
As for buttermilk, it wasn't meant as a color. It was meant to d..."
I'm with Jason on being confused about Brahm's skin color. When I was reading, I dismissed using buttermilk as a texture because it's sort of curdy and full of bits of clabbered milk. Not exactly a pleasant image for skin! LOL.

Well, I really wanted to know more about Mira. That character could have been built on magnificently along with her relationship with Great Bear. I also want to learn more about Gault and his people.
But I have to say, the one that upset me the most was the loss of Diarmuid. He, of all the characters, had me sold. Diarmuid and Brahm were favorites. I wanted to see where the spark between Paine and Diarmuid led. :( (They really needed to have sex, btw)
I also felt a loss for Dior. I know his soul is still within the story but I found myself liking him.

David wrote: "Thought I'd throw this out there. How would you classify this book? Fantasy?"
I'd say it was dark fantasy. It's not really horror, although it edges that direction now and then.
I'd say it was dark fantasy. It's not really horror, although it edges that direction now and then.

This is an interesting question for me, because my heyday of fantasy reading was back in my youth, so (unfortunately) the defintion of fantasy that is firmly entrenched in my mind is that of a 12-year old who is expecting a straightforward, black and white good vs evil, swordfight-heavy or quest type story. (Clearly I need to branch out and discover some new fantasy authors, which is what I am doing here!)
My point then:
1) I was pleasantly surprised by my stupidly naive expecations being overturned :)
2) If I was to pick this up as my younger self seeing this laballed as "fantasy", I don't think I would have liked it or understood/appreciated it.
David, how would you classify it? Was there a problem with classification from the publishers point of view?

I suppose I would put it into dark fantasy.



This is where we can have at it. This thread is really meant for those that have finished the book. If you're still reading, or haven't read it yet, and want to ask some questions, let me know and I'll start a thread along those lines.
So for those that have finished it, what did you think? Like it, love it, meh? Anything surprise you? Anything offend you?
I'll start with the following, but feel free to throw out any question/thoughts you like. I tried to do something a little different with this series, in particular, blurring the lines of good vs evil. I didn't want it to be a true dichotomy. What do you think about that?