Constant Reader discussion
Constant Reader
>
Mini Discussion For August : TheThousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet




I left Gabrielle a message. I don't remember who else wanted to join in though.

Is everyone also reading Agee's book for the classic discussion? Let Us Now Praise Famous Men





August sounds good to me, but if people want to start sooner, I'll just join in later.


In the mean time I have read another book by Mitchell and I am entranced by his writing.



I was questioning Al about how some critics were comparing Mitchell's writing to Tolstoy's W&P. I could not figure that out. It did not seem of epic proportions as Tolstoy's W&P.
Money, greed and profit is still the mantra for commerce. I felt like the Japanese were like the Indians, only the Japanese were better able to resist the influx of foreign influence and to actually out smart the foreigners by insisting on isolating the outsiders from the general public.

Me neither!
About the language use: I'm Dutch, and I read the original English version. Mitchell does a good job mingling the three languages, but maybe this is one of the few books I'd like better in the (Dutch) translation.
And if anyone would like to know the joke about Major Cutlip's "unfortunate" name, erhm... As you probably guessed: x-rated.

OK, here goes: you'd write it "Kutlip" in Dutch, but the pronunciation is the same. "Lip" has the same meaning as in English, the first three letters are common slang for the female genitalia.
So here is you first lesson in Dutch cursing :/

Do you think isolation is why the Japanese were able to maintain their cultural heritage for so long or is it something else?

I left Gabrielle a message. I don't remember who else wanted to join in though."
I don't even have the book yet. :( My husband's and my finances this month have precluded book buying, getting hair done, and even paying my health insurance! :O And some people say the recession is over! LOL Not for us.
And the library here doesn't have it. To make matters worse, my computer gave up the ghost this weekend. (Obviously I'm using a computer, but it's not mine. I'd love to keep it, but can't, darn it.)
I do know Mitchell is nothing at all like Tolstoy, though. Tolstoy was into character development, while Mitchell is postmodern and has always been more interested in the architecture of his novels than in character development. Cloud Atlas has a 1-2-3-4-5-6-5-4-3-2-1 structure. The climax of the book came in the middle.

It's a strange notion for me though, I always rather tend to see culture as something fluid, developing further (mind you, not better per se) and interacting with other cultures, than as something static. Any country that wants to keep the exact same culture is bound to fail sooner later.
Overall, I liked the book a lot. Mitchell diverses here from his usual postmodern style and made a true page turner.
I've found this fun, digested read, by the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/...
This also points out a few style quirks that I couldn't help but noticing too. Those distracted me a little - not only the thoughts in italics, but also the alternating sentences: description of surroundings - description of action / dialogue - surroundings - action / dialogue, and so on.
Does anybody know if this is a Japanese style figure?


See? He's more interested in the architecture of the book than in developing believable characters.

Gabrielle, I don't fully agree with you here. Though those were two style quips that bothered me a bit, those were relatively small scale, and didn't influence the overall structure of the book. But I wouldn't call it character-driven either, it seems more story-driven to me.


Gabrielle, I don't fully agree with you here. Though those were two..."
I've not read this particular book, yet, so I'm no doubt wrong about Mitchell. I'm glad he's getting more into story than architecture. I do like him, though. I've found his work enjoyable, though I couldn't take a steady pace of it. I'm glad when I do read the book, it won't be as postmodern as Cloud Atlas. I think Mitchell is a terrific writer, but I'm not into postmodern in a big way.
Carol, Buddhism still does adhere to reincarnation. It's believed that we get what we need in order to evolve. Not necessarily punishment for bad deeds or rewards for good, but we receive the life lessons we need.
Many Japanese adhere to Shinto. I don't know much about that.
http://jinja.jp/english/s-4f.html



What I found astonishing is that Buddhist priests destroyed this beautiful temple because their status quo was upset. The SGI adheres to Nichren Daishonin's belief that everyone can achieve Buddhahood and you don't need priests to do it.

There were some intriguing stylistic devices that were fun for me to notice and ponder, such as [SPOILER ALERT:] the sly rhyming prose description of the diving and swooping seagulls at the start of chapter 39, told from the point of view of Magistrate Shiroyama contemplating his need to commit hari-kari -- all one long, exhausting run-on sentence.
In fact, Mitchell had a fascinating way of presenting the turmoil and inner focus of characters facing imminent death (now now now) -- which made it hard to know at times which characters might or might not survive a particular crisis.

I just finished this book today. It's setting in Japan interested me because I lived there for a couple of years a long, long time ago. The fact that it was written by David Mitchell also drew me in. Cloud Atlas ended up confusing me, but (as most people here have noted), Black Swan Green was very readable. Along with Philip, I had a hard time putting this book down.
WARNING PLOT SPOILERS
Mitchell lived in Japan for a number of years and his wife is Japanese. What he wrote about Japanese culture rang true to me. The exception would be his weird subplot about the monks breeding and then killing the babies. That whole part seemed straight out of a sci-fi book. On the other hand, it certainly kept me glued to the page and I was willing to go along for the ride.
I liked the fact that the plot kept twisting and turning in unexpected directions. Occasionally, it bothered me that he didn't really explain what happened. For example, he built up all the suspense of Orito escaping and then when he finally got back to her many pages later, just told us that she had decided to return.
Have any of you read James Clavell's Shogun, another historical novel about a foreigner in Japan who is in love with a Japanese woman? At times this book reminded me of that. Mitchell is certainly far more talented stylistically, but he and Clavell are both exceptional storytellers.


I just finished this book today. It's setting..."
I read Shogun and loved it, but I didn't remember Blackthorne (I think that was his name) being in love with Japanese women as much as just one Japanese woman in particular. Is that correct, or have I forgotten something, which is quite possible.

Those stylistic choices are the things about Mitchell that irritate me. I think he's a near genius writer, one of the best persons writing today, but I do find some of his choices irritating. He can't please all of the people all of the time, though.
The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet has made this year's Booker longlist. I'm not sure when the shortlist will be announced.
Books mentioned in this topic
Black Swan Green (other topics)Black Swan Green (other topics)
Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (other topics)
I for one am looking forward to discussing this with others.