Horror Aficionados discussion
eReaders/eBooks
>
Technology
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lori
(new)
Jul 22, 2010 11:20AM

reply
|
flag


I don't think they'll stop making real books for a long time, they said the same thing about CD's when MP3 players started booming. The only crappy thing will be electronic exclusives.






That was you? I must be buying up all your old used books.



How are books greener than eReaders? Books use paper, which is made of trees. eBooks kill nothing (that I know of) and are simply electronic ink. Am I missing something here?
On topic, I love real books also, and I plan on using my eReader (when I get one) for reading free and cheap eBooks. I'm sure it won't replace my book collection, just nicely and conveniently add to it.

Books don't? Probably a dumb question, but a legitimate one nonetheless.


On another note, I have a tree-hugging friend at work who is so behind on technology that he prints out book suggestions and articles he wants me to have/read. I think to myself, "Just send me the link!" He also drives a beat up Toyota (?) that isn't as fuel efficient as newer models but he thinks he's helping the environment by keeping a thirty-year-old car.

I hate small print, so I'm looking forward to adjusting the font size when I get my Kindle.






Yes your missing something. Electronic gadgets don't biodegrade and the chemicals used to recycle them are extremely toxic. A book will degrade to nothing but fertilizer, tree's will regrow faster than the elements mined to create the wonderful electronic gadgets and a book doesn't require a source of power to use (other than the sun and your eyes). Remember half of the US uses coal to get electricity (currently). So in short, yes the good old book is much greener than the electronic forms. Also take in mind, if it isn't grown, it's got to be mined and I don't now of anything natural in e-readers, little alone most electronic devices, at least for consumer use. Not everything labeled green is, sometimes its just to get us to buy things, in the case of e-readers, they are selling convenience, not a greener, planet friendly way of reading.
Anyway, I'll always buy paper books but I'm not against electronic books. Heck I've been reading them longer than it's been a trend and I won't stop either.

When they can make money off it is when it will be used, a sad reality of things I think.

Another dumb question (I'm just filled with them today): what does it mean to "strip" a book?

White Wolf was a publisher that required the entire book be returned so that they could be redirected to other outlets. Unfortunately this made their books very hard to find, as many bookstores wouldn't carry them (or stocked very small quantities). They also used a certain amount of recycled paper in their books. So it is possible.


I have them too. One maddening one in particular in my right eye that manages to float directly on the line I'm reading. The only way I know of to move them around is to look up a few times. It's supposed to move them but this one always goes back to my line of sight. Grrr.
One of the reasons I'll never get an ereader. The biggest reason is I love the feel of a book in my hand. Hardcovers, I'll remove the jacket...sometimes the spine has a coarse texture to it that I like :)



I love paper books, but I think an ereader is going to save me money and space. I will still buy or borrow regular books.
I think what we will see, and have already, is that ebooks is going to bring about a boom in first time authors. Kinda like blogging has done for the masses.
It will be cheaper to get your ebook published than to get a paper book published.
I have already seen ebook exclusives.


Thanks, I am searching for reviews now.


http://www.mirasoldisplays.com/ereader
The e-reader only display we currently have is going to be short lived if the e-ink style display can continue to develop and come down in price. At least E-Ink has some competition and that's always good for us consumers.

http://io9.com/#!5748038/book-lending...

Bookstores renew my soul. I could never stop going to them. :(

Authors such as Lansdale will always be a hardcover purchase for me. Most other authors, though, will not be. I just can't afford $25-$30 for books. Even when I was employed my budget never made room for those prices...unless it was a beloved author.
Books might decompose, but at this point in time I can't imagine ereaders are finding their ways to the dumps. I also figure that they will be like handheld video games, and an after market used life will always exist. A person can still walk into a used video game shop and buy an old Game Boy. I figure some day we will see Kindles and Nooks in the used book shops.

I'm with Carl to, some authors will automatically be Hardcover and/or paperback purchases, because their work means something to me. We've also got to remember that unlike music and movies, books have a much bigger library to digitize and if your legally looking for some books older than say ~2008, you might be SOL. Either way I think both are good for us readers, but I think the silliness of 'print is dead' is getting rather old. TV didn't kill movies and the PC didn't kill office printing, just like many other things.


And speaking of King, for a retired guy, he's sure still spitting them out.