Horror Aficionados discussion
Authors
>
Robert R McCammon
message 1:
by
Bob
(new)
Jul 26, 2010 09:12PM

reply
|
flag

Just read the first chapter of that book and that'll be enough to get you hooked...
I'm having a hard time finding a copy of Swan Song


My favorites of his old stuff is:
Mystery Walk
Swan Song
They Thirst
Stinger


How I'd place the McCammon books I've read, in decreasing order of awesomeness:
1. Boy's Life
2. Stinger
3. Mystery Walk
4. Mine
5. The Wolf's Hour
6. Speaks the Nightbird
7. Blue World
1. Boy's Life
2. Stinger
3. Mystery Walk
4. Mine
5. The Wolf's Hour
6. Speaks the Nightbird
7. Blue World


Boy's Life is my personal favorite among his works, and also one of my favorite novels of all-time. It's absolutely brilliant, so I'd suggest you start there.
And Stinger is probably the best of his novels for sheer fun. Imagine if that old Brando film, The Wild One, had been made as a 1950's B-science fiction movie. It's just entertaining as hell.
And Stinger is probably the best of his novels for sheer fun. Imagine if that old Brando film, The Wild One, had been made as a 1950's B-science fiction movie. It's just entertaining as hell.

McCammon, and Mine, is fairly tame violence-wise, at least compared to the splatterpunks. The majority of Stephen King's stuff, even, is much more brutal and bloody than McCammon's.

I loved Boys Life but Mine drove me nuts. It started sort of gruesome and dark and turned into a Koontz style chase thriller. I didn't like the break from that opener and even though I liked the hero of the story I thought the villain was sort of annoying.

I didn't really like Boy's Life or Mine, myself. I'm not sure why, but they just didn't work for me. I might try Boy's life again, sometime.
Everybody says Swan Song is great, but I've tried and failed to read the thing so many times that I've lost count. I can't stand it. The characters and their storylines strike me as so cliched and uninteresting, and the writing, for McCammon, seems really off.

Today, however, I'd agree with you on some of the characters and plot lines, Jesse. If I were to reread Swan Song today, I'm certain that Sister Creep might annoy me, for example. LOL

Ha, I imagine that, yes, if I'd come to Swan Song when it was released, I might have an altogether different opinion. Thankfully, McCammon's other novels and I have become good buddies, despite the years.


I don't reread books, I reread passages. Two-or-three-page snippets that I have remembered fondly, and want to revisit. The final pages of It, for instance, which ends with that fantastic sentence...I won't recount it here, as it really holds no sort of resonance without the previous 1,000-odd pages to back it up, but lemme tell you, amigo, it gives me chills every time.


I always thought the whole "copying King" argument was pretty weak. Certainly, there were elements of King in McCammon's stuff, but there were elements of Bradbury and Matheson in King's stuff, weren't there? I always thought McCammon got screwed over by being called a King and Straub rip-off. It just didn't seem fair, because here you had a really good writer doing really good work, and nobody bothered reading him because he was always getting lumped in with the dreadful hacks that stormed the bookstores after King hit it big in the early eighties. McCammon is his own writer, and a damned good one.
Sorry for coming on so strong, but I have a tendency to wave the McCammon flag whenever and wherever I can, and oftentimes get carried away.


Baal, Bethany's Sin, They Thirst, Stinger, Mine, The Night Boat, Mystery Walk--if you want any of these books, you'll have to find them at a used bookstore, or online. It's a shame, too, but they're pretty easy to get a hold of.

Mystery Walk is great. I actually prefer it to Mine. It's my third favorite McCammon novel, and was considered the masterwork of his early career. Basically, Mystery Walk is McCammon's The Shining. At least, that's how I think of it.

I never thought McCammon was copying King; just seemed like the plot for Swan Song was similar to The Stand and I had just come off reading The Stand so I wasn't in the mood for another epic book like that. Still plan to read it one day.
McCammon is an original, IMO. Someone who writes something like Boy's Life and Speaks the Nightbird is talented as hell and doesn't need to copy.
Swan Song seems to me the only instance where the "McCammon copying King" claim can come into play. There are scenes in that book that seem directly lifted from King's novel, and set down in different locales.


Also has anyone ever been to his site. I love looking at the fan art people do for him and his foreign book covers some are better then the ones we got and some are just downright silly.
http://www.robertmccammon.com/fan-art...
http://www.robertmccammon.com/gallery...
I'm pretty sure that McCammon himself has said that he doesn't want his first four novels in print, as he felt that they were not up to his standards, and that he was allowed to mature as a writer in public.
And Bob, yeah, the fan art is fantastic.
And Bob, yeah, the fan art is fantastic.





Personally, I didn't know an author had that kind of pull with his/her publishers. I guess when you sell as many books as McCammon does, it no longer matters really.
Haha, I think it's Hunter Goatley, but Goater sounds even better.
Books mentioned in this topic
The River of Souls (other topics)Blue World (other topics)
Gone South (other topics)
They Thirst (other topics)
Swan Song (other topics)
More...