SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
Members' Chat
>
I've never read Dune. Should I?

I adored the Dune (the book.) It is an absolute classic, and I would definitely recommend it to any sci-fi fan. (There are several other books that come after it in series, not to mention the prequel series written by Frank Herbert's son, Brian, but the first book simply titled Dune can stand strong alone.)
As for the movies - there were actually two, although I think the second was a television adaptation: The first movie (the David Lynch one, although he himself despises it) was fun, although not exactly true to the book. It teeters somewhere between cheesy and awesome, if you know what I mean. I liked the casting. The second movie version was truer to the book, although not perfect, but I personally didn't like the casting as well.
Whether or not you ever view either movie, read the book first. It's really a special piece of speculative lit. To answer your question: Yes, I think it stands the test of time. It's set in a universe so fully realized that it isn't really rooted in any particular Earth-based time period or culture, and it's pretty egalitarian about things such as, for example, gender, etc.


RE: the sequels - I have never read the books, but the 'Children of Dune' miniseries put out by SyFy (then Sci Fi) a few years back was actually pretty good, despite cut-rate effects. So once you've read 'Dune' I'd recommend checking it out.


I've read every Dune novel and have enjoyed them all for various reasons, some more than others. And I still can't get enough. As long as they write them, I'll read them.
Dune has literally changed the face of sci-fi. Herbert's Dune was turned down by more than a dozen publishers because it was considered 'too epic'. Up til then, most scifi was short stories mostly published in magazines and novels but nothing with the scope of Dune. And Dune is still the most purchased scifi novel of all time. It'd be worth your while to read it if you're a scifi fan. You won't be disappointed.
Don't bother with the movies, they sucked in comparison and lacked the subtlety and vision of the books. Or if you feel you have to see the movie, at least wait til after you've read Dune.

I saw the 1984 movie when it was 1st run and loved it. It got a bad rep for being too confusing, so a couple of other versions were released that gave more explanations, but they really didnt help the uninitiated. The movie is good if you know the book, which I had read 3 or 5 times before the movie came out. Think of it like understanding any Jesus movie or Passion play if you were not familiar with the story and mythologies.
The 2000 and 2003 miniseries (Dune and Children of Dune) are as mentioned more true to the books, more detailed and surprisingly good, but they too contains much that will be missed by the uninitiated.
I would strongly suggest you read (and perhaps reread) the books before seeing the videos. I watch these once a year or so, the movie then both miniseries.

(That said, I watched it the first time in college without anyone explaining anything, and I don't remember it being that hard to follow - though I'm sure there's stuff from the books that didn't translate that well, or at all.)
Personally, I'm finding it a bit plodding. It's interesting, and I find some of the political and religious commentary and whatnot interesting, but some of the writing I'm finding a bit jumpy and haphazard.
I would recommend reading it in the sense that it is a classic, but I wouldn't say it's a must-read in the sense of personal enjoyment.




As for the sequels, I'd say skip them unless you want to read all of them, including the prequels written by his son, Brian, and Kevin J. Anderson. I did enjoy the way they wrapped the whole thing together and wrapped up Frank Herbert's legacy. But Frank Herbert's books after the first are, well, odd, and they detract from the majesty of the original Dune. So I'd say all or nothing.
My opinion is to skip the movies. But if not, definitely read before viewing; it will allow you to form your own images, some of which are too big or unique to have been captured by the movies well. And I think you'd enjoy the movies more with the full scope of the story in mind.

Then decide about the rest, lots of people have stopped at just the first. But don't go past four. 1-4 make an satisfying arc where the quality is still good (i liked god emperor though it is very different.) I honestly don't think 5and6 were needed
And movies after the books or i could imagine they'd be really confusing


Curious. What do you consider much better works?



Specifically, I love the world-building in Dune, and I found the characters compelling and mostly believable. My younger brother is still obsessed how cool Gurney Halleck and Duncan Idaho are. And seriously, read the book (I liked the first three, actually) first. The movie and series will make more sense, and you then get a chance to see the the characters for yourself, before a director imposes a version on you.
My vote is to give Dune a try. IMNSHO the series declines after #1, although I'm fond of God Emperor of Dune because it's a bit of a storytelling departure.


Having said all that, whether you love it or don't, Dune is definitely worth reading. It is canon, yes, but it was a groundbreaking work for when it was published, and still a monumental work today.



Curious. What do you consider much better works?"
in terms of similar-ish work; the hyperion cantos, the night's dawn trilogy, a fire upon the deep, startide rising, the vorkosigan series, the gap series. to name a few examples. i always preferred the foundation series over dune too.
a lot of people might feel differently, but the characters, stories and writing just appealed to me far more in those books than dune's did. and i especially love the massive scale and complexity of peter f hamilton's work.
i only read the first dune book though.

Thank you for that comment.

I agree these series and books you mention are good books and among the best SF. But, I would not consider them "much better works".

Well, Dear Readers, I am indeed reading Dune.(I purchased, downloaded and started e-reading the day after I posed.)
The verdict? Oh yes. I definitely should have read Dune. It works for me on many different levels.
Cheers to everyone that posted. 300 pages to go!

as to the rest of the series, it is also worthwhile reading in order to explore all the themes about which Herbert wanted to make a comment. having said that, the first time i read God Emperor, i gave up. but i did go back to it and continued with the rest of the series. each time i re-read it, i find some new element that seems even more pertinent now. that, to me, is a sign of a timelessness of a great book, and an amazing author.


I found God Emperor boring in the extreme and put it down. This was well over 20 years ago now. I've been thinking of reading it again, motivated by my teenage son having read Dune twice and stealing my copies of Dune Messiah and Children of Dune.

I loved it when I was in High School and many consider it a classic. However, imo, it doesn't stand the test of time. I couldn't make it work for me as an adult.

It's good you have not seen the movies or tv shows, because that's of course a major spoiler to the story. I read it 6 years ago and i am still blown away by how good the book was.


It is intelligent, with great characters and with intricate Byzantine politics. But buried within this Machiavellian society are people who love and care for each other deeply, and in a very believable way. It is one of the first SF books where ecology is a key factor, and was much more in depth than anything else from that time. It is also fascinating trying to figure out how their society evolved from ours, and Herbert is great at telling you just enough to speculate, without giving too much away.
With respect to the series, I liked the first best, and Dune Messiah and Children of Dune round out things nicely. My second favourite of the series was God Emperor of Dune.


Well, Dear Readers, I am indeed reading Dune.(I purchased, downloaded and started e-reading the day after I posed.)
The verdict? Oh yes. I definitely should have read Dune. It works fo..."
So, why only 3 stars?:)
Depends on your levels of stamina!



Books mentioned in this topic
Sisterhood of Dune (other topics)The Bighead (other topics)
Children of Dune (other topics)
God Emperor of Dune (other topics)
Dune Messiah (other topics)
More...
Book was written in 1965 - 5 years before I was born. Does it stand the test of time? Here's the question though - should I bother at this point? Is it a classic that Must Not Be Missed, or is it something that one could just easily pass by?