Literary Fiction by People of Color discussion
About the new poll
date
newest »

Well, of this list it would be Cleage, Harris & Golden (in that order).
But, I've really enjoyed the polls as is. I've been introduced to some phenomenal authors that I knew absolutely nothing about previously. I must have a list of 20 "to be read" books just from the also-ran list of books from this group. I will occasionally read a book even if it's not one I selected just to join in on the conversation; which I will intend to do with the Danielle Evans book for November. I don't think I would be too inclined to do the same with a Dickey book. Sorry, no disrespect for any of these authors on the list, but they garner enough attention as it is. They will have people lined up to purchase their books without an advanced blurb. On the other hand, Nnedi Okorafor, Irene Sabatini and other sensational writers like them are not afforded that luxury. Sorry, that's just one persons opinion.
But, I've really enjoyed the polls as is. I've been introduced to some phenomenal authors that I knew absolutely nothing about previously. I must have a list of 20 "to be read" books just from the also-ran list of books from this group. I will occasionally read a book even if it's not one I selected just to join in on the conversation; which I will intend to do with the Danielle Evans book for November. I don't think I would be too inclined to do the same with a Dickey book. Sorry, no disrespect for any of these authors on the list, but they garner enough attention as it is. They will have people lined up to purchase their books without an advanced blurb. On the other hand, Nnedi Okorafor, Irene Sabatini and other sensational writers like them are not afforded that luxury. Sorry, that's just one persons opinion.

I belong to another group that's trying (with little success) to read romance novels. We also had the idea that it would be useful to step outside our norm and read a little more widely. It's not going well so far. :-)
I have to echo Columbus again. The writers on your polls are often new to me anyway, so you're already widening my horizons. Thank you for that.


I find the whole business of categorising books to be very interesting, partly because I suspect it's got more to do with brands and marketing, and the marketeers' limited imaginations,than anything else.


William, was Baldwin not considered literary in his day?



So I'll proceed apace, offering what I hope are good quality reads and welcome any suggestions for books to place on future polls (even authors that were included on the poll!).



not sure..


thanks all

I am a non-voter for the same reason I am on this discussion list: almost anything this group wants to read is either new to me, or they are books I've read alone and am delighted to have peers with whom I can talk about them at last!
I live in a small, white university town (punctuation intentional). We have many independent bookstores. Most have four shelves called "writers of color". Everything is jammed in there; Chimimanda Adiche, Pearl Cleage, Garcia-Llorca, Terry McMillan, Ha Jin. They are usually too rarefied to include any "urban fiction" unless it's gay (James Earl Hardy, E. Lynn Harris, etc) so I don't even know that the 'urban popular fiction' genre exists.
So, your survey is of value, even though it didn't have the intended results. Putting out a request for new ideas and hearing 'none of the above' in response must be frustrating. But simply having the space to wonder about "literary fiction' vs "popular fiction" is of tremendous value to me.
Many thanks to you, Rona and Mina for making this space possible, and for your leadership in keeping it alive for all of us.
gratefully reading,
Mistinguette S.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/...

Rachel
The View from Here
Books mentioned in this topic
The View from Here (other topics)Authors mentioned in this topic
Susan Straight (other topics)Carleen Brice (other topics)
As always I welcome suggestions for book to include on the monthly polls.
Please share with me your thoughts on the subject.