Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
Russian authors with different latin spelling of their names
date
newest »



I take the English author name as primary author and ad the German/Dutch/other language author name as secondary author.


Yes, the problem is not the Latin, but which one of the different Latin spelling.
----
From the general mood of the thread I get that the one used in UK and/or USA should be used, but it might be nice to have a general guideline. There are a lot of different authors who may end up with the same problem since their names are spelled differently in different countries (I run into this problem a lot with English and German spelling of Russian authors).

The problem with having the different spellings as secondary authors is you'll end up with a lot of unnecessary authors. I'd just roll it all up into the English spelling.

The problem with having the different spellings as secondary authors is you'll en..."
Hmmm ... The problem I see there is that most of the German users, for example, will still search for the author under the German name. The question is what is worse: many authors or spelling which will be regarded as wrong by some users (and is not the name on the book)?

Unless they implement a way of having different "editions" of authors so you can have a field that is hidden from the front end but contains their name variations for the search engine to check.
If the primary authors are different, I cannot combine the different edition of her books, which is something I would really love to do, because it's the same book, just in different languages ...
An example would be this lady here:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
Her name is spelled differently in English, German and Italian:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
There are some other spellings of her name which I can dismiss as wrong, since clearly only the Russian edition of her books are listed under them. But those three are all definitely right, in their respective countries of publication ...