Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
Members
>
Anyone use an ereader?
message 1:
by
Jennifer
(new)
Jan 12, 2011 02:52PM

reply
|
flag
I too use an ereader. I have a Sony PRS 300 (the one sold at Wal-Mart). I have no interest in upgrading, though. I don't like the idea of always being connected to the internet while I read. Sure, it might come in handy to instantly download new books, but it's just not my cup of tea. It keeps me from spending too much.




I have a Kindle and love it. I'm knee-deep in physical books at my house and it had really gotten out of control. I've always read a lot, but the Kindle makes buying and carrying books so effortless that I think I went through around 150 books last year!
Sadly, a pretty big chunk of the 1001 must-reads are not yet available as eBooks.



I love real books and still buy them - in fact, after doing a major pare-down to try and get our books to fit on the bookshelves we have (we didn't succeed), I then wanted to go to the bookstore that evening. An ereader will never replace real books in my life.
That being said, there are lots of books that I know I'm only going to read once that I don't need to own, and it's SO wonderful to travel with a whole library in a space that's smaller than a deck of cards. I regard the two as complimentary, not competitive.

Thanks; I thought it up on the spot. It's unfortunate that so many of the 1001 are tough to come by in e-form.



But you must admit there are advantages to an ereader, for example when traveling. As I get older I like being able to read in bed without a big heavy hardback and I'm sure the ability to change font size will come into play sometime as well. (I'm currently reading Under the Dome and that's a heavy book!
I haven't tried downloading books from the library yet, which could be another advantage when it's icy and cold out.
I still can't pass up good deals on used books, and still have books on reserve at the library, but I think over time the ereader will be at least 50% of my reading. (My husband travels for work, and I go with him, so I do travel 10-20 weeks a year.)

I recently purchased a nook & have found quite a few 1001-list ebooks for free. I am starting with the oldest & working my way to the present, but so far out of the oldest 100 books, I have found 70 free ebooks. Try using inkmesh to search for specific titles.


My clip-on bed-reading light proves more practical on the e-book reader than on a pocket edition.
Already in a month's time I'm hooked; at last started reading some of the 1001 that where on my paper must-/wishlist, but not on my shelves. I thoroughly disliked reading e-books on a computer screen, but the reader reads like a dream. It saves costs for larger housing too, by the way.
It's just incomprehensible that so many books published these days still come in a paper edition only.

Also, it's sometimes worth it to spend the money for a good translation of a foreign novel. I know that the P & V translation of War and Peace was worth the money. The translations that are in the public domain aren't as good.


I do like the device...I like dictionary look up. I like the bookmark feature...I like shelve organization feature (new)...I like the highlights/notes feature. I don't travel much, but I can see this as a HUGE advantage of the nook. This should be more prevalent in their marketing IMO. I like that I can take a break from my book and play some sudoku on my nook, too. ;)


Lisa, though I have a Kindle, I do agree with you. I prefer a real book over the Kindle.
I do love the dictionary feature though, as with some classics I tend to have to look up a lot of words. The Kindle is better than carrying around 2 overly large tomes. Ha ha!
My personal reason for the Kindle was the amount of free books it had. I live in a more...rural area, and the library isn't quite up to snuff, and the nearest major bookstore is 45 minutes away. Therefore a lot of titles were hard to find, especially the more classic books. On the Kindle a lot of them are free, so...it worked really well for me.
Anyways...
That was a really long, drawn-out response, but...
Ooh, the smacking people with books...wouldn't you worry about damaging the book? ha ha! Sorry, I could picture it in my head, and had all these off-the-wall questions pop into my head. You smack with paperback and hardback? I'd think HB would work better. Doesn't that mean you'd have to get in fairly close proximity? That might be dangerous. Or maybe she means family. My family members might break the book (hard heads).
Sorry. I'll go now. Ha ha!

I'm a book collector from the time I was a wee kiddo, and I also thought I'd miss the physical book experience. I was thoroughly wrong. I got my iPad about 9 or so months ago, and I far prefer reading on it. to add to the convenience of instant purchasing (people now know the only gifts I really want are amazon/iTunes/b&n cards to fuel my addiction), portability, and changing the font size, resting this little slice of aluminum & glass on my knee is infinitely kinder to my carpal tunnel than holding open even the lightest paperback.


How true that is, and that proves each time reading in bed, reading on the bus or in the metro. I imagine myself this spring on a bench in the park, where I just brought a 'pile' of books, still uncertain which one would go with my mood.. Some of the readers, like mine, can get a nice protective cover that even has the touch of luxury binds.
But, passing your e-book reader will never give you the same sentiments viewing the binds, connected with you forever, as you have with even the ugliest worn out pocketbook on your bookshelves. I agree with Rachael there, though I combine the best of both worlds, like probably most of the e-readers-readers do..


I love the free classics available on the Internet and the dictionary function within the texts. I also am pleased that you can adjust the text size for an always optimal version for your eyes.
I'll still keep collecting great books and loving to own, hold and read them; but I've learned that an e-reader can be a nice addition to an ever-growing library in limited space!

I love the dictionary, the Wikipedia and Google search, the highlighter, and the notes. And I just simply don't have the shelf space for another physical book.
I tend to end up paying some amount for the classics because I like the introductions, footnotes, etc. of a good edition and I like a modern translation if the book is in a foreign language. Only translations as old as the book are likely to be in the public domain.




I watched









Oh, how I love my Kindle, let me count the ways:
Portability
Instant dictionary
Notes in the margins
Highlights with ease
Still able to "fall into the book"
Turns many books into audio books
Ease of use for carpal tunnel or arthritis
Font changes for vision issues
Instant access to millions of books
Don't have to wait for paperback to save money
With effort I could continue.
I still read and love paper books. The Kindle has only enhanced my reading life. Is the Kindle a panacea for bibliophiles? No, there are times when only paper will do (i.e. bathtub - don't learn THAT lesson) But in raw comparison, the Kindle beats a paper book on every point but sentiment. Even then I would argue that those who have a Kindle feel very passionately about them.
Love my Kindle. Carrying my whole library in a small tablet has been a blessing. Just love it.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Forsyte Saga (other topics)Under the Dome (other topics)