Chicks On Lit discussion
Archive 08-19 GR Discussions
>
The Far Pavilions - next chunky /Reading Sched

I am new to this website and this group and have already read 2 other books with you that I might have never read - and I enjoyed them both, so thanks!

At the end of Book One, Ash is returning to India in a British capacity. Is his heart British or Indian? I suspect that there will be a lot of conflict for Ash as well as Belinda. Ideas?

I think Ash's heart is Indian. He's adopted only a few traits from his English education...a certain understanding of how "his people" view the world. It seems like the biggest part of his conflict comes from a need to belong in both his parents' world (where most people think he should be comfortable) and his foster mother's world (where he is most at home). Left to his own devices, he could have lived out a perfectly average and happy Indian life.
Belinda at the end of book one left me feeling apprehensive. Can't say much more than that as I've got a bit ahead of myself...
Something else I noted: With a different attitude, Janoo-bai could easily have been a herione in this book... Her malice towards the Rajah's other children sets her as a nemesis, but her ascent from a mere dancing girl to Rani could have been admirable. I also found it ironic that she would seek "better" marriages for her sons than Lalji's considering her own background -- that she, who came from practically nothing, would hold a girl's parentage as a defining portion of her worth.
Also: Some of the English characters express disapproval of the Indian caste system (which doesn't allow members of opposing castes to so much as eat with one another), but I find that a little hypocritical. In their own society, where the English are not held at the bottom rung becasue of their skin color, a caste system is perfectly acceptable. (example -- Think of Belinda's mother's opinions of the men on the boat who vie for her daughter's affection. Only some of them are considered prospects, because most aren't rich enough, or of noble parentage. And a half-Indian man's background would be considered scandalous and unacceptable.)
It took me a few chapters to get into the flow of the writing... Some of the heavy, obvious foreshadowing and bulky descriptions of the land threw me off at first. Now that I'm deeper into the story, though, I'm completely hooked. Glad I joined in here! I would never have picked this up otherwise.

Ash, on the other hand, felt a lot of conflict when he got there. I think the major conflict being who he really is.
I am hooked too!


Carrie, thank you for your comments regarding the place of women and the ironies inherent in the English view of the caste system. I found them very insightful! Social mobility really wasn't all that possible in England until the industrial revolution...and even then it was limited to the few who were able to "rise above their station" through their own merit...the odds certainly were against them since those well off had a clear advantage...
I am really looking forward to seeing how this unfolds...I feel like there has been so much going on already and we have barely put a dent in it!

I wonder how much of this is the author's social criticism/reflection... I would guess that a lot of it is. Especially the wisdom of Ash's uncle Akbar and his father -- saying that both the English and the Indians would forget the good in one another, and that the most important thing to do is act justly.

Did everyone's Book Two start with chapter 8?

In England,at the time of the novel, they were in the Victorian age. This was a time where there was an extreme amount of stress put upon the classes. One certainly should not marry out of their class and it was kind of inbred in a way how people knew and should remain in their class. It was where they belonged.The books of that time reflected class structure so well (think Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, North and South etc.) So, it was truly a caste type system. India gave a name to it while England gave it a rank.

I believe Ash’s heart is in India with the only family he had ever known, Sita. He spent, at least, the first ten to twelve years of his life in India, so at that point I would think your life, especially during that era, is already defined. It is almost as if he left India to attend school.
I also could not help reading ahead...I had high hopes for Ash and Belinda, but they quickly changed.

Yes, I agree with the rest of the posts, Ash is Indian. Not only was his formative years spent in India believing he was Indian, but his experiences in England were very unpleasant, devoid of friends or much affection.
The author does appear to have an agenda. I appreciated Ash's observations about English customs. She made it clear that exotic and inappropriate is simply a matter of perspective. She wants you to parallel the class system of England with the cast system of India,for example. Ash's reaction to British foo, the use of a tooth brush and English housing were told in such a way that the Western reader could not but help realizing that familiar is only that, familiar, and not necessarily normal. It was great to have the relationship between Ash's father and uncle at the outset of the novel. You are told right away that tension is not inevitable. The two men lived, dressed, believed differently, but could respect one another's differences. Belinda appears to love India for the priveleges she experienced there as the spoiled child of British colonizers. England meant discipline and obedience while India meant freedom and indulgence. It does not appear that Belinda had the native's love of India. And, that is what Ash has since he spent most of his life far from pampered. I wonder to what extent speaking the language enabled understanding. I have read that language shapes thinking. Is Ash and his father so open to Indian ways of perceiving reality because they speak the native tongues?
I also wonder how accurately the author portrays Indian life in mid-19th century. I read so many books where liberties are taken. My brother won't watch dramas set in hospitals because he finds the inaccuracies so irritating. But, as one outside the medical world, I am minimally aware of the problems. Likewise, I can't watch or read most tales set in a Catholic monastery or parish because they take such liberties with the culture. I wish I knew enough to recognize what is literary licence and what is really credible.


I believed the author lived in India for many years and that is where she drew upon her experiences.
I am still wondering about the conflict that Ash has within. His "mother" raised him, but he must have some feelings to the father (English) that died and conflicted in his allegiances. I think this is going to be ongoing throughout the book.



Laura -- I am sorry it is not available on the Kindle. I read it wrong.


@Meg. No worries. Truly-- I thought it was me that had read it wrong. I do have the physical book so I am good. Maybe Kindle or Nook will have it available sometime in the near future.
Last night I finished my first FirstReads win, so now I am back reading Far Pavillions and want to catch up. I am definitely hooked too! Let's see, I am a little further where Lajli (sp?) killed Ash's pet mongoose; how horrible. I need to look up what a mongoose looks like; my guess is they are similar to a ferret? :-)



Sandra: It was for me too. I kept stopping and thinking, "Wait a minute...how old is this kid again?" The things he accomplished amazed me.


There were so many sad scenes and circumstance in Book One.


Overall, I'm really liking the book, have always enjoyed reading novels about India (Rohintin Mistry is a favorite), the historical references are very interesting and enlightening to me.



" The past is the past, and it is best that it should be forgotten. The Hindu boy from Gulkote(ASH) is dead and in his place is a Sahib--an officer-Sahib of the Guides. You cannot alter that; or try to be two people in one skin.
"I am that already," said Ash wryly. "Your brother helped to make me so when he told me that it would be best for me to go to Belait to the car of my father's people, and to learn to become a Sahib. Well, I have learned. yet I am still Ashok, and I cannot alter that either, for having been a child of this land for eleven years I am tied to it by something as strong as the tie of blood, and shall always be two people in one skin--which is not a comfortable thing to be."
What is your opinion of this? How do you think this philosophy will play throughout Ash's life? Will he constantly have a struggle of his identity and who he believes he is?






No worries, Sandra. I am behind too with toggling between two books and life in general. Very good book though-- I always look forward to reading it.


I agree, it speaks volumes for Sita's character!

The HBO Miniseries
In 1983 Peter Duffell directed a Goldcrest-produced epic three-part mini series based on the novel starring Ben Cross as Ashton, Amy Irving as Anjuli, Omar Sharif as Koda Dad and Christopher Lee as Kaka-ji Rao. The mini series ran 316 minutes, a theatrical edit of which ran 140 minutes (Titled "Blade Of Steel"), cutting out half the story. Although conventional in storytelling and photography, the mini series has ample production value and is faithful to the book, cutting short only the youth of Ashton before his return to India. The epic score by Carl Davis has become a collector's item.
The HBO Miniseries on DVD
More info: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086711/