Into the Forest discussion
Film/TV /Radio Adaptations
>
Beastly.
date
newest »


I had to watch the trailer without sound this morning. Even without sound I feel like I watched an entire movie in 2.5 minutes. Haha! I am guessing I missed some twist, but it sure did seem like a tiny little movie from start to finish.
He does not look beastly.
I haven't read the book, but he really doesn't look Beastly. In fact, I've seen people in the city who look like that, and no one screams in shock.

If you take a good looking guy, and you shave him, put "engraved" tattoos all over him, and lock him in a house-- he's still a good looking guy. It doesn't translate well. I think a lot of live action fairy tale adaptations have to tone things down, and it makes them hard to enjoy them.
The New York Times give Beastly a so-so review. It did have a funny line, however.
Mr Pettyfer [he plays the Beast character, Kyle] is fine to look at (he's harder on the ears), though more so after Kyle is cursed by a Goth girl . . .
So according to the Times, he is better looking as the Beast.
Mr Pettyfer [he plays the Beast character, Kyle] is fine to look at (he's harder on the ears), though more so after Kyle is cursed by a Goth girl . . .
So according to the Times, he is better looking as the Beast.

If you do a search for the promotional poster, you can see that they still have him prettied up.
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm420370944...

Beastly was a quick, but nice, read. For anyone else who has read it, what do you think of the movie trailer? They're not making him look like a beast at all. I can see how it would be hard to do that, for the movie, but it really changes the meaning. He still looks HUMAN. What do you think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Neo6W1...