Victorians! discussion
Archived Group Reads 2011
>
The Count of Monte Cristo: Ch 16-25
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Silver
(new)
Apr 01, 2011 09:29AM

reply
|
flag

When Dantes relates his story of what happened to him the Abbe Faria tells him that "unless an evil thought is born in a twisted mind, human nature is repelled by crime. However, civilization has given us needs, vices, artificial appetites which sometimes cause us to repress our good instincts and lead us to wrongdoing."
Which it is indicated in my notes that Faria was a follower of Rousseau who believed that humans are born free and virtuous and it is society which corrupts them.
While Villefort I think can be seen as fitting into this model for we do see within him an initial desire to goodness, and at first he did treat Dante with leniency and kindness, but upon the discovery of the piece of information, the letter to his father which he feared may do him harm, his goodness was corrupted by his ambition which can be seen as supported by society in his feeling his need for material success in the world.
Yet Dangler's does not appear to have any good instincts within him at all, nor does he appear to feel any sense of guilt, or remorse for what he has done.
In considering the characters and the story thus far, do you think that Dumas confirms and agrees with Faria/Rousseau's ideas about the natural inherent goodness of man?
Is Dante's young age at the start of this novel significant in supporting this idea? Does Dantes goodness, and his own inability to conceive of the fact that anyone else may in fact actually dislike him, or hate him so much as to plot against him be due not just purely to naivety of his youth but the fact that he himself is still in the state of "natural goodness"
When speaking of Villifort Faria states that he is too young to be corrupt and yet old enough to be ambitious"
So in Dantes youth is he like Adam before the fall, and with the knowledge that Faria's has imparted to him, opening Dantes eyes to the truth, is that his first bite of temptation, the first thought of vengeance which has now begun to rise with him, is he now on the path to becoming man corrupted in spite of his own inherent goodness?

Dantes, on the other hand is young and desperation often plays into his moods and
actions. He has not acquired the spirit of everything comes to those who wait. How much
like a youth he is, as it always seems one spends their youth never finding serenity. Abbé
seems to have found serenity within himself and determination fills his being. Dantes is
floundering until he meet Abbe who put a direction to his life.

Dantes, perhaps in part because of his youth does not have that same strength in faith but his own feelings in God fluctuate between finding moments in hope to cursing God because of his fate as well in this way, though Dantes resigns himself to his despair, in the fact that he never even considers the possibility of escape he does not "accept" his situation in the same way that the Abbe does.
And one of the biggest sources of Dantes misery is his lack of companionship. So the Abbe is able to provide for Dantes the guidance and the comfort that he is lacking and that he cannot find within himself.

Abbe Faria is one of my favorite characters. He is such a positive figure in the midst of Dante’s darkness. He is Dantes’ mentor, friend and spiritual father. During their relationship, Abbe helps Dantes transition from being a naïve youth to a mature, educated young man. I think with regards to faith and companionship, age plays a role. As you have stated for Dantes, without companionship he is miserable. But for Abbe, his solitude allows him to be creative and make objects (like a needle, paper & ink and a knife), plan and execute escape routes.

I think taking risks get easier as you age too. You are less worried about the 100 ft drop and more hopeful of the possible outcome (freedom).

I was amazed at everything Abbe Faria was able to accomplish compared to Dantes; however, I think it is a bit of an unfair comparison given Faria's vast knowledge.
I was happy Dantes and Faria established a relationship, especially since we as readers know that Dantes' father passed away. I think this was a lifesaver for both men, and it will be something that Dantes can favorably look back upon because he turned out a better man because of Faria's influence and teaching.

I didn't realize that Faria was probably a follower of Rousseau, but that makes sense to me now that I read that. It does seem to also be supported by Dumas, since Dantes is so young, and all the things that happened to him were caused by a force other than himself, and now his outlook on life is changed.
I also think it strange that Faria's beliefs are consistent with Rousseau's teachings, but he also seems to be a firm follower of God. Being a Christian myself and having studied a little about Rousseau's teachings in school, it seems odd that the 2 would go together since they are at odds. It is interesting to see different views, and maybe what Dumas is saying was very much believed in his day/culture?
One other thing I noticed that is so different from modern day stories about action and revenge is what Faria said to Dantes when Dantes told him his plan. Dantes said they could escape by killing a guard, but Faria was quick to dispel this idea since they would have to murder an innocent man. I don't see that very often in modern novels. Everything today is pushing humanism and self preservation at ANY cost (Atonement comes to mind). In modern novels/movies it bothers me when people take "the end justifies the means" philosophy and do whatever they want to with it, including killing. We don't have any clear-cut good guy vs. bad guy today, everyone is mixed up somewhere in between. Not that I don't like a hero with a flaw, I just like to see his flaw recognized for what it is, and how he responds to it. It is nice to see a true hero in Faria, rather than an anti-hero.

I didn't realize that Faria was probably a follower of Rousseau, but that makes se..."
I have not really thought of that, but that is an interesting observation. While the plot line of vengeance, and the idea of the sympathetic prisoner who was wrongfully imprisoned, and framed for the greed and corruption of others is something that is still seen very often today but it is interesting to contrast the different approach between than and now.
Dumas I think really wants to get the reader to philosophically contemplate the question of revenge, and he himself does not whole heartededly condone or condemn Dantes and his plans of revenge but I think he does wish for the reader to come to their own conclusion on the character of Dantes and the nature of revenge.
Dumas also draws upon the idea of justice and the question of God and the question of actually righting the wrongs more so than is seen today in which the quest for vengeance does become more just about the personal self-fulfillment of the individual and the simply wanting to harm those who have harmed him.
But Dumas does make it about something much more than that.

Right now, I feel like I want Dantes to just escape out of there, but then again, I wouldn't want him to kill anyone to get out of there. I feel as torn as he does. I think Faria is one of those people who come into our lives and stop us from making bad choices, and whose impact on us is seen for the rest of our lives. As I right this, I think of the song "For Good" from "Wicked", lol.