Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion

This topic is about
The Raie'Chaelia
Bulletin Board
>
Looking For Reviewers
date
newest »


I just spent time going through their reviews in some fiction genres and every review was the essentially the same: a summation of the story, followed by "must read", "magical", "outstanding", or some similar overly effusive comment. I'm sure some of these novels deserve the enthusiasm, but ALL of them? In the 40+ reviews I skimmed through, the closest I found to an evaluation of the writing were along the lines of "wonderful characterizations" or "descriptive prose".
All of these seem like weak and generalized comments by apparently very knowledgeable and skilled book reviewers. Surely they have better insight (and vocabulary) to delve a bit into the plot development, characterizations, interplay, dialogue....something?
I doubt every book submitted is a "5 star read"...I know it's free so do they just not post reviews for novels that were average? I know it seems silly to complain, but I'd rather have a true critique and this doesn't feel like it. But I could be wrong. I admit I fell to skimming through after the repetitiveness of the first 10. I'd like others' opinions..

I personally tried them and spoke to the founder Norm Goldman, from our chat what happens is that for example an author e-mails them asking to be reviewed, Norm checks if the book is worth it and accordingly if he does he contacts the reviewers on the site who read and review this Genre. Also some of them have background for example about the genre of the book , like for example the reviewer of my book Sandra Schwayder is both an author and reviewer , and she's an ex-Federal Attorney specialized in civil rights and domestic violence, so for my novel for example , this fell right into place.
Of course I am also quite new in the whole writing scene, so this is what I came up , being from Egypt and trying to promote my book abroad is not really the easiest thing to do. I've tried reaching the Guardian newspaper for example in the UK and after succeeding they told me they only review books published in the UK only. So actually most of my finding for reviewers so far are people like Bookpleasures.com or Erin O'Riordan who write their book reviews on their blogs. And many others I've come across through twitter who also blog about their readings
It would be useful to share the different experiences..

Even reading a so-called 'poor' review, rated lower because 'the story had too much XXX and I don't like XXX' let me know what was going on in the book and I've bought just because I've thought to myself "heck, that's MY kinda story!". That's why I wanted feedback on them. On the website Mr. Goldman sounds professional and the bios for his reviewers as well, which is why I wondered if perhaps authors who received a bad review simple chose to keep them withdrawn.


you might want to consider www.bookpleasures.com
they offer free reviews on books..
Best regards,
Tarek