The Sword and Laser discussion

352 views
What Else Are You Reading? > READY PLAYER ONE

Comments Showing 1-50 of 51 (51 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by Eric (new)

Eric (ciredark) | 8 comments If you consider yourself a geek, you NEED to read this book.
If you lived in the 80s, you HAVE TO read this book.
If you were ever an MMO addict, You REALLY OUGHT to read this book.

If you are a geeky MMO addict obsessed with the 80s, you ARE this book.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but if T&V don't review this book for the show, then they kinda fail at their "job". Just sayin...

If it makes it any easier, Wil Wheaton narrates the Audible version.


message 2: by Josh (new)

Josh (firequake) | 30 comments I second this notion. I know very little of 80s pop culture, but really enjoyed this book. I started this book and ended up reading it straight though, neglecting everything I was supposed to do that day until I had finished it.


message 3: by terpkristin (new)

terpkristin | 4407 comments I dunno. I'm about halfway through and while I like the geeky nostalgia and enjoy the old-school game references, it's not really that inspiring. So far the pseudo-romance has been as insipid as Twilight. And there are a lot of things about how the world works, coincidences, etc that are really not explained well and seem (so far) like plot holes.
Don't get me wrong, the book's enjoyable, but I wouldn't say you NEED to read this book. Your life will not be enriched by doing so, but it is a fun diversion.

Also, Jenny's tip to listen to it at 2x speed is well worth it. At normal pace, Wheaton's narration feels slow/clunky.


message 4: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments terpkristin wrote: "Also, Jenny's tip to listen to it at 2x speed is well worth it. At normal pace, Wheaton's narration feels slow/clunky. "

He does have a slow gate doesn't he. Reminds me of someone presenting a speech and pausing for emphasis, or having done a toast masters course and been told to use it as a mechanism to ensure he doesn't speak too fast. Anyway I'm actually not minding him at normal speed, find it a relaxing pace.

Anyway I'm not far in, (view spoiler) but I would echo that it is a 'fun' read if you have a fondness with the 80's. I don't know what it says about me that so far there has been very little named from that period that I didn't know (though I did somehow miss Ladyhawke).


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments Yeah 2x is just about right, and then it feels energetic!

As someone who might still waste a lot of time in a clunky virtual world, you might say I'm totally coveting this Oasis experience. But having to pay for each teleport? Poor Wade3. ;)


message 6: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Jenny wrote: "Yeah 2x is just about right, and then it feels energetic!

As someone who might still waste a lot of time in a clunky virtual world, you might say I'm totally coveting this Oasis experience. But h..."


You play RuneScape? ;)

Generally side stepped the whole MMO(RPG)thing myself. Never trusted myself with the timesink I knew it to be.


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments Andrew wrote: "You play RuneScape? ;)

Generally side stepped the whole MMO(RPG)thing myself. Never trusted myself with the timesink I knew it to be. "


Worse. Not a game.


message 8: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Jenny wrote: "Andrew wrote: "Worse. Not a game."

*curious* We talking oldskool.. PnP & dice RPG?.. or you a Secondlifer :)


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments Dice? Hahaha. You got it.


message 10: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Really. Secondlife? what you do there? and more importantly has it changed at all since I last visited.. oh 5 years or so ago?

I personally know some people who use virtual worlds in education (for university and school level), but I don't think it quite took off as people thought it might - ala Ready Player One virtual world style.


message 11: by Tamahome (new)

Tamahome | 7221 comments I never wore leg warmers. Not sure I would enjoy the book.


message 12: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Tamahome wrote: "I never wore leg warmers. Not sure I would enjoy the book."

I don't believe you.




message 13: by Poly (new)

Poly (xenphilos) Damn, I was gonna post this topic, but didn't have the free time. Yeah, I LOVED this book as well. I'm not an MMO geek or obsessed with the 80's, but there are still a lot of geeky stuff about it. I actually recently watched WarGames for the first time and got into Rush because of this book when it mentions their 2112 album.


message 14: by Tamahome (new)

Tamahome | 7221 comments !Ee yah!


message 15: by Tom (new)

Tom (fermionace) | 39 comments I agree with terpkristin's criticism on the romance thread and the world. I would say that the romance thread is better than the one in Anathem, but that's not saying much. The world really didn't make a lot of sense. The author spent a decent amount of time describing it near the beginning of the book (quite well actually), but then it just came apart as the story progressed. For example: (view spoiler). The story within the MMO stays coherent, but the one outside it jumps over some big holes.

I don't want to sound hypercritical. I really enjoyed the book quite a bit (4/5 stars), and I even filled in some gaps in my 80s pop culture knowledge. I especially liked how the author did his best to explain some of the pop culture references within the context of the protagonist's pursuit of the Easter egg. I felt that this worked much better than more disruptive asides/interludes I've seen in other books. I also enjoyed how the author slipped in a few hidden references (view spoiler).

I think I need to say that I was born in 1981, and I remember quite a bit of the references from my childhood. I was a geeky male kid, into D&D, sci-fi, and video games at the time. I still enjoy 80s music. I'm not sure how much people with different backgrounds will enjoy this book, but I think the author did a pretty good job trying to keep it accessible. I'll find out when my wife reads it.


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments Yeah the romance.... not really very interesting for some reason.


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments Remember when alternative music used to be alternative? :)


message 18: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Ok just finished this (as audiobook). As terpkristin said this book won't change your life, stretch your horizons, etc.. but it is just plain fun. The story arc isn't unpredictable, and the circumstances (or affordances of the characters) might seem a little far-fetched at times but the world is interesting, the homage to pop-culture (particularly 80's) is novel and the characters are enjoyable to spend time with. Overall thumbs up if you want a lighter, enjoyable read which I suspect most S&L members would probably like.

Actually if it hadn't been for this book being laden with 80's references I wouldn't have blinked if this had been slapped with the hard to pin down Young Adults tag much like The Hunger Games.


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments The hunger Games was way scarier.


message 20: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Jenny wrote: "The hunger Games was way scarier."

Oh come now, (view spoiler) is pretty scary :)


message 21: by Kris (new)

Kris (kvolk) This was a fun book. Like eating M&M's when you go to the movies. Sweet and filling but still not to diffcult to finish.


Jenny (Reading Envy) (readingenvy) | 2898 comments You guys have to see the concept art for the movie version. So cool!


message 23: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Jenny wrote: "You guys have to see the concept art for the movie version. So cool!"

Nice. Though I thought he was ment to be larger (more overweight).. pimply etc. Didn't quite match my mental image.


message 24: by terpkristin (new)

terpkristin | 4407 comments Andrew wrote: "Nice. Though I thought he was ment to be larger (more overweight).. pimply etc. Didn't quite match my mental image."

Well, you know, this guy wouldn't exactly be a draw for that lucrative female audience. ;)


message 25: by Tamahome (last edited Sep 09, 2011 05:28PM) (new)

Tamahome | 7221 comments terpkristin wrote: "Andrew wrote: "Nice. Though I thought he was ment to be larger (more overweight).. pimply etc. Didn't quite match my mental image."

Well, you know, this guy wouldn't exactly be a draw for that luc..."


http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips...

(Sorry if you can't view this world family)


message 26: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments terpkristin wrote: "Andrew wrote: "Nice. Though I thought he was ment to be larger (more overweight).. pimply etc. Didn't quite match my mental image."

Well, you know, this guy wouldn't exactly be a draw for that luc..."


ha! yes, true. Still he needs some scope for transformation later in story.

I wonder how they will be able to make this movie with so many licensed properties.


message 27: by Troy (new)

Troy | 7 comments I'm going to agree that you owe it to yourself to read this book if you spent time the 80's. As someone who's first computer was an Atari 800XL, played Zork on a TRS-80 in eighth-grade, and rode my bike to the mall arcade to play Tempest whenever I could, this book put a smile on my face every page.


message 28: by Eric (new)

Eric Gardner | 113 comments Loved it despite the flaws, thanks for the suggestion!


message 29: by Joel (new)

Joel (joelevard) Andrew wrote: "Actually if it hadn't been for this book being laden with 80's references I wouldn't have blinked if this had been slapped with the hard to pin down Young Adults tag much like The Hunger Games."

it has been classified YA. and with good cause.


message 30: by Robert (new)

Robert Wilson (rmw66) | 6 comments Count me as another '80s teen that loved this book. It definitely reads as YA, but I don't think that should keep anyone from picking it up. The author really does a good job of loading every page with nostalgia without overloading the reader (at least that was my reaction). In a lot of ways this book makes me want to re-read Snow Crash (or maybe Neal Stephenson's first book, The Big U, which came out in 1984 and was a little hit-and-miss itself). I have to agree with everyone's criticisms of the non-OASIS scenes from the book concerning the lack of consistency. And I'm trying to keep from getting too excited about the movie due to the entire plot hanging on IP owned by other people and corporations. It seems unlikely that enough of those groups will get on-board to keep from significantly changing major plot elements.


message 31: by Gregory (new)

Gregory (gfitzgeraldmd) | 51 comments I just finished this book yesterday, and have to agree with most of the posts here. Growing up in the 80's makes this book a fun nostalgic trip thru my formative years. The plot holes are a bit distracting, but I get the feeling there were some parts edited out (such as the trip in the RV with Aech and Parzival) to save time and keep the story moving.


message 32: by Jason (new)

Jason Bergman (loonyboi) I really liked RP1, but yeah, I'm a child of the 80s. References aside, I thought the sci-fi was pretty good! Reminded me of snow crash (a little).

I did find it to be very much a reflection of the author's specific tastes...I would have preferred more Star Wars and less Japanese giant robots, but that's because of my own childhood. And the lack of any references to home consoles post-Atari seemed odd as well, considering how Nintendo dominated the second half of the 80s.

But still...good book. Really liked it.


message 33: by John (Nevets) (new)

John (Nevets) Nevets (nevets) | 1903 comments Really enjoyed the book, one of my favorites of the year. I'm going recommend this to several friends, some are guys I used to play AD&D with and haven't talked to recently.

That said, yes there are big plot holes, lots of exposition at the beginning and one other thing that is a personal pet peeves in story's like this.

He is not the only author to do it but it annoys me each time I read it. It has to do with stories set in the near future, with references to the current time (or just a few decades back). That's that it seems many authors limit there references to things that have happened instead of mixing it up with things they created for the years between now and when the story takes place. In this particular story, that would have made sense if he had kept the references solely to the era he said (the 80's +/- a few years), but once he started using WoW and Firefly (greatest TV show ever) that took place in the 21st century I felt he should have thrown some creative properties from the 2010's and 2020's in there as well. It always feels so abrupt, like creativity just stopped or something.

Sorry for the rant, just something I had to get off my chest.

John


message 34: by Carrington (last edited Sep 19, 2011 11:47AM) (new)

Carrington Vanston (carringtonvanston) | 6 comments Just finished Ready Player One, and I loved it.

If you grow wistful at the mention of Infocom and Atari games, can quote lines from WarGames and Monty Python, or spent your high school years listening to Rush and playing D&D, then you'll find a lot to like here. It has heaping piles of 80s "nerdstalgia."

If you're an 8bit nerd this book won't change your world, but it just might rock it.


message 35: by Been (new)

Been | 125 comments I wasn't a child of the 80s so much as the 90s, but I know enough about both eras to get a lot of enjoyment out of all the geeky little references here and there. I also can't help but notice that Halliday's life seems to draw quite heavily from the lives of other famous video game designers. How he releases his first game in a ziplock bag which then gets picked up and distributed is pretty much the same story as how Richard Garriott got into gaming, and his tendency to lock himself away then comes back having programmed some amazing new software is definitely a chapter taken out of John Carmack's own.


message 36: by Ben (new)

Ben Marshall (275ben) | 8 comments @John: I found that pretty glaring at first too, but what do you think of this as a (partial) explanation?

(view spoiler)

Overall, the book worked for me. I burned through it in one (very) late night reading session, but with pauses to find gaming emulators, music videos, and film clips on YouTube. I'm a little young for most of my 80s recollections to have been from that period, and my upbringing was more about reading, music and study than about gaming & popular culture. However, as a bona-fide, card-carrying geek, the story tugged at me. The progression of the challenges, virtual treasure hunting and the details of Wade's life kept me dialed right in.

Besides: (view spoiler)


message 37: by Andrew (new)

Andrew (adrew) | 426 comments Joel wrote: "it has been classified YA. and with good cause.

Didn't know that. Seems my gut was right then.

@Bean: I definitely sensed a homage to some of the gaming alum going on also.


toria (vikz writes) (victoriavikzwrites) I just downloaded from Amazon. I will join you as soon as I've finished these booker books, hopefully early next week.


message 39: by Lindsey (new)

Lindsey I loved this book despite not caring about a lot of the stuff the author cared about. Although I really thought it would have made more sense if (view spoiler). Which I told Cline at a book signing and he was like, yeah.


message 40: by Rik (new)

Rik | 777 comments I just finished listening to this book. I was a teen D&D playing geek in the 80's so I loved all the references. Its definitely the most fun book I've listened to in a long time.


message 41: by [deleted user] (new)

totally loved this book. it gets me xD


message 42: by Tim (new)

Tim | 380 comments And I loved it, for exactly the same reasons that guy hated it. Yes I lived through the 80s (was in my 20s), but American gamer culture was not exactly a big thing in this part of the world, or maybe I was too old, so I appreciated the explanations, yet enough of the influences had seeped down that I wasn't entirely at sea.


message 43: by [deleted user] (new)

the linked review reminds me more of the classic "true geeks" vs. "fake geeks" argument. or "real gamer" vs. "wanna be gamer" etc. one side always has to raise themselves above the other and state they are the TRUE [insert whatever]. it's tiring, annoying, and simply immature. kinda like with sex. those who have it, don't talk it about and vice versa. you can talk about gaming and being a geek or you can simply play video games and be a geek. one who truly loves what they're doing doesn't feel the need to constantly convince the rest of the world of how much they love it and how this makes them a much better person. simple as that for me.


message 44: by [deleted user] (new)

quoting Yoda: do or do not. there is no try.


message 45: by Rick (new)

Rick Left me cold. I'm older than most of you though (60s, not 80s) and the book relies a lot on love/nostalgia for the 80s geeky things. It also relies too much on young love/coming of age stuff which bores the hell out of me in general (not just in SF) and the outcome was, well, predictable. I imagine if you were a older kid/preteen/teen in the 80s this was a blast to read. As someone who was in his early 20s when the 80s opened... /yawn


message 46: by [deleted user] (new)

I know someone of your age and he loved that book, so I honestly doubt it's a generation thing. Some people love a book, others don't.


message 47: by Rick (new)

Rick COuld have been the young love/coming of age thing too of course. Just saying that the stream of references to the 80s stuff didn't do anything for me whereas I can see how it could give a lift to what was a a fairly standard story with stock characters for someone for whom those references brought back cool memories.


message 48: by Rick (last edited Nov 27, 2012 01:50PM) (new)

Rick He was a bit stalkerish, but he was really just the awkward, socially naive teen boy dealing with his first love.

This book and Dirty Streets were both gushed over by the same general set of people and I've learned that I need to dial down their enthusiasm to match what I'll likely think. Nothing bad about that - we always have to figure out how others' recommendations play in our world. For me, this was a pretty stock story with a pretty stock plot and a climax that was completely predictable. It feels influenced by movies a lot - while there's some drama, there's (view spoiler) Note, btw, that the protagonist is the guy, not the girl who is every bit his equal.


message 49: by Gail (new)

Gail | 5 comments I loved the book, but I tend to blast through the relationship drama. And I'm 57! BTW, my 13 y o daughter loved it too.


message 50: by Rik (last edited Nov 28, 2012 06:19AM) (new)

Rik | 777 comments Was just posting about the Otherland series by Tad Williams while talking in the DSOH threads. I kind of wonder if Ready Player One was inspired by Otherland.

For those who haven't read the Otherland series its set about 50 years in the future and about 80% of the series takes place in computer generated alternate realities and fantastical worlds. There is even a character in Otherland who is not the gender everyone thinks he / she is, just like RP1. If you liked RP1 you might try this series. It doesn't have any of the 80's fascination but it does have a very wide plot that comes together fantastically at the end.


« previous 1
back to top