Supernatural Fiction Readers discussion
Common reads
>
The Monstrumologist by Rick Yancey
date
newest »


At least two of our group's members have posted thoughtful reviews of this book here on Goodreads: a five-star one (http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/... ), and a three-star one (http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/... ). Maybe these will provide some provocative opinions or insights to help get discusion going!

Seriously, I started a couple of days ago and am three or four chapters in. I like what I'm reading so far. Imaging a cross between Sherlock Holmes and Kolchak the Night Stalker. Okay, don't--probably not wise.
Anyway, so far it's been entertaining, with a little bit of dark humor and one pretty suspenseful scene in a graveyard.
Looking forward to reading some more soon!


Backstory is unfolding well, and there is more than I would have expected, bringing the characters of the monstomologist and his assistant to life.
As a side note, there isn't really anything supernatural here (unless there will be a surprise later); just nasty creatures that no one has ever heard of. Definitely horrrific, though...

Also, I could not help but picture Domo.

I agree about the creature being familiar. Is it me or do you get a cartoonish image? I know it's supposed to be scary, and parts are, but I keep imagining a creature from a Scooby-Doo episode. :-)

Also, I had no idea this was considered a young adult novel, either before or during the reading. Aside from the POV character being twelve years old, I can't really understand why the author or his publisher would limit the readership by pigeonholing it as such.
One of the reasons for the surprise was the amount of gore, especially to victims of a very young age. I guess part of this is that I always envision YA novels to target teens rather than twenty-somethings.

New England was Lovecraft's stamping ground, too (though he usually --but not always-- set his work in his own time), and he also preferred to have naturalistic, science-fictional explanations for his horror, rather than supernatural ones. What other features of Yancey's work here did you find Lovecraftian, Robert? (I'm a Lovecraft fan myself!)

The creatures are horrific by themselves, but unlike Lovecraft's works, the bloodiness is almost--if not more--horrific. And the quirkiness of the monstrumologist is a bit humorous, unlike Lovecraft.

Funny you mention the book being marketed for YA. It didn't feel YA to me for the same reasons you pointed out. My guess is because the YA market is huge right now and the publisher may have thought it would sell more copies in that market. Some say books like Carrie by Stephen King would be considered YA in today's market. I admit I wouldn't have bought this book if I wasn't in this group. I typically stay away from YA...too much angst for me! lol
I'm still reading so no spoilers! plus I'm reading The Night Strangers by Chris Bohjalian. It's a contemporary ghost story and very good so far.


Yeah, I enjoyed his eccentricity. Made the read that much more fun.


I liked the story narrator. I found him very sympathetic. Which made the story more objective. He seemed too smart for a kid though. I thought it was more believable, also, that the Doctor did not have a 180 turnaround in character at the end.

Since this common read was a success, I'd like to make it a group tradition to have one each October (though that doesn't mean we can't do them at other times, too). There's something about the month of Halloween that seems especially appropriate for supernatural reads!
I haven't got my copy yet; I do hope, this week, that I'll be able to get back to a normal reading schedule (I should know tomorrow), but the local branch of our county public library doesn't have a copy. So, I'll have to have one sent here from another branch, and that'll take a few days. But anyone who wants to can comment, pose questions, share reactions, etc. in the meantime! For all those who post, at any time during this discussion, I'd suggest that if you want to share something that's in the nature of a spoiler for those who start late or read more slowly (or both), you enclose that part of your post in a hypertext spoiler sign, which uses the < and > marks the same way you do to italicize something, except that instead of i and /i, you use spoiler and /spoiler. That will hide that part of your post behind a "view spoiler" link that has to be clicked on to be read; and it'll save us from having to start a spoiler thread in addition to this regular one!