Discworld discussion

This topic is about
Snuff
Snuff
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Andy
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 03, 2011 01:55PM

reply
|
flag


On the other hand: the Watch still COULD be interesting. And Pratchett can always write a brilliant book if the stars align correctly. And what little I've heard about Snuff has been very promising. So although i'm trying to tell myself I won't like it, and not to get my hopes up, I still nurture a hope that I may love it.

Louise, Pratchett is worth buying and rereading. For me anyway. I agree with Wastrel that Thud and Monstrous Regiment weren't the best of the bunch but I still enjoyed them.


Personally I don't like this trend of lumping the books into Watch, or Death, or Rincewind books or whatever else, it's enough that they are all Discworld books and I see them all as stand alone novels (except Colour of Magic and Light Fantastic)
Anyway that's my 2p worth :-p



back to the topic of this discussion... we'll have to wait and see.
Oh, and Unseen Academicals... laughter and giggles

[the Moist books are my LEAST favourite. There's nothing original about them. Not to say they don't have funny moments, of course, but still... ]

at first glance he is just a cad and chancer, but he is funny and as his faults are made manifest his character deepens.
as for originality, well, there is nothing new under the sun.







David Suchet does not plan to die until he has done a tv version of all of the Poirot stories :)



From Sourcery onwards, I have always bought the mass market paperback as soon as they came out - I don't remember ever seeing them in hardback in the 80s. And I want to keep a matched set...


The result is that I now own BOTH the hardback and the paperback editions of that, which is a bit of a waste of money.
Luckily, these days you could get e-book editions from "alternative sources", that's what I did with "I shall wear Midnight", so I could read it straight away and waited to add the paperback to my collection in relax, and I think that's just what I'll do with "Snuff", too :-)

The result is that I now own BOTH the hardback and the paperback..."
I have first edition hardcovers of all of Pratchett's books since "The Truth." Most of those before that are paperback. I'd like to get hardcovers of those as well if I can find them cheap. Some of the paperbacks are getting a bit ragged.



I tried to make mine last to savor it. I made it to three days.

When I was done, loaned it to my son. He finished in two days. Loaned it to another son. He read it straight through in an afternoon. Kids! They always want to rush things.


I thought it was ok, definitely better than a lot but not quite up there with the best. On my ranking of discworld books i put it 21st (out of the 39) about half way.
(has anyone else ranked all the series?)

I thought it was ok, definitely better than a lot but not quite up there with the best. On my ranking of discworld books i put it 21st (out of the 39) about half way.
..."
I try not to rank Discworld books. It's like trying to choose my favorite child.



Other characters have been allowed to develope into their own personalities. Lady Sybil shows her understanding how the world really works. Willikins personifies the Summoning Dark, going where Vimes cannot. Young Sam just loves poo; he will get over it, it's just a phase he's going through.



The book is darker and is dealing with the emotional issues of older people, rather than with the madcap adventures of the younger. There aren't as many puns and it might not be quite as much fun, but that goes with the territory.
Plus, while it is simpler than some other books, "Unseen Academicals" was the most structurally complicated book he has written.

Recent books, indeed, were more inclined towards "darker stuff", and while character development is a good thing, there can be too much of it when it takes over the Story, which used to rule in Pratchett's universe, remember narrativium?
I always thought Pratchett's best character was the Discworld itself, and while it still makes a nice background, there's little more than that to it, lately.
Mind you, I don't think Pratchett's "declining", despite his illness, he's made choices, don't think he's "lost" that delicate balance I mentioned above, he renounced it, and I have to accept that.
Still, those howling laughters... and letting your mind wander around a few thousand years of history (and evolution) gone wrong, than back to reading and more howling laughters, and tears of myrth streaming down your face... I miss that... but I'll keep reading!

And I miss the humor.
