The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
Reamde
2011 Reads
>
RM: How it ends--No Spoilers
date
newest »

message 1:
by
kvon
(new)
Oct 24, 2011 06:21PM

reply
|
flag




@terpkristin- I'm curious if you graduated from Maryland. I'm guessing that's where your handle comes from.

@Philip yep, I graduated from Maryland in 2001 with my BS and 2004 with my MS. I still live sort of in the area (I live in northern Virginia) so I buy football season tickets each year and go to games when work doesn't get in the way.




I did like Richard (view spoiler) - that felt very "Stephenson" to me.

I find it interesting that the novel's cover is mostly the author's name in large text with the novels name as almost a subtitle.

Part of my disappointment came as a result of a review I read (AV Club, maybe?) that talked about the last 150 pages as being a nonstop action sequence. Stephenson can write GREAT action over long sections of a book (view spoiler) but this really wasn't the case here. All that setup and moving of characters seemed to just drag on and on.

To your questions, I was satisfied (I don't know why knowing WHERE the ending would take place matters), it didn't feel rushed and I wasn't worried much with "completeness" in what was basically a thriller...
@terp@philip Hope y'all are enjoying Edsall. Good guy and good coach...but y'all shouldn't have got rid of the Fridge. Not so good a guy and bad recruiter but a great coach.
P.S. they didn't really get along when they were at GT together.
And while under armour is a UM company, GT was the first school to actually use it...



I just finished it, and must say your summary seems to echo my own feelings Nick. I really struggled with the last 20% both due to lack of time, but also desire.
As to the ending it was what I expected and as @Mike said felt somewhat telegraphed.


I actually listened to the last 20% after reading the first 80%. I didn't find it to be any better. The narration was ok, but I actually preferred reading it to the audiobook. I was lacking for sit down reading time, verse other downtime where listening was possible so saw this as a way to wrap it up.



Stephenson has said he wanted to make the two parts of the book into two separate books but his publisher decided to keep the parts together
http://www.denverpost.com/recommended...
"Reamde" has two parts of almost equal length: "Nine Dragons" and "American Salt." While it would be possible to treat the novels as a series by splitting them up, he said his publisher has generally decided to keep the works together.


Oddly, I also felt like Anathem was two books mashed together.


The book also failed the 'Can I explain it to others'-Test. I tried to sum up the story to my wife and the whole thing just sounded so unbelievable and unconvincing to me and her. I don't think I would recommend the book to my friends.
Finally, the book was also my first Stephenson. From his geek fame, I expected the story to have more to it than just constructed action and a race around the world. Needless to say, I was deeply disappointed.

Too funny! This is probably the easiest Stephenson book to explain to someone(not that it's easy to do). The guy is very quirky and seems to be hit & miss with many people.


Yeah, the ending was kind of disappointing, but that's how I felt about the book in general. I really liked the characters and the in-game and behind-the-scenes aspects of T'Rain, and for those aspects I'm glad I read it. But a lot of the whole chase/action-sequence plot held too many implausibilities to be immersive for me, and it was too long of a slog to work purely as a fun pot-boiler/adventure. (It wasn't just the length - Anathem and Cryptonomicon were both nearly as long, but I felt they justified their lengthinesses).
Nick wrote: "Stephenson has said he wanted to make the two parts of the book into two separate books but his publisher decided to keep the parts together."
That's very interesting. I wonder if I would have enjoyed it more that way.
For those of you for whom this was your first Stephenson, please give Snow Crash a try at some point - I probably like Reamde's characters more, but Snow Crash is much more imaginative and better paced (considerably shorter, too ;) ).
Nick wrote: "Stephenson has said he wanted to make the two parts of the book into two separate books but his publisher decided to keep the parts together."
That's very interesting. I wonder if I would have enjoyed it more that way.
For those of you for whom this was your first Stephenson, please give Snow Crash a try at some point - I probably like Reamde's characters more, but Snow Crash is much more imaginative and better paced (considerably shorter, too ;) ).

It could be the change of genres to a Thriller but I would label Cryptonomicon that way as well and think it's a great book. This was just crammed with coincidence and unbelievable situations piling one on top of the other. Entire blocks of chapters were completely irrelevant filled with characters that were over described and still flat and unmotivated.
The book truly came to an end for me with the deus ex machina that is Abdullah Jones. The rest of the novel felt so contrived I finished out of loyalty to Stephenson's past work instead of throwing it in the bin like I should have.
I will still recommend every one of his other stories but I really wish this one had died in the hard drive.