FABClub (Female Authors Book Club) discussion

This topic is about
When She Woke
Group Reads
>
When She Woke Discussion (Oct/Nov 2011)
date
newest »





Who was you/y'alls favorite character? I loved Simone.


I haven't gotten to the Canada part yet.

Well, I've finished it. I really enjoyed it while I was reading it and couldn't put it down. Now that it's been a few days my opinion is starting to cool. I think it is more an effective political statement than it is a good novel.






So given that we agree that the characterization is rather flat, but that the plot is thoroughly engaging, what about the politics? In many ways the future she postulates is not all that different from what we currently have. If Mississippi's recent "personhood" amendment had passed, that might well have resulted in the criminalization of abortion. I think those sorts of religious communities do indeed currently exist in the U.S. Is the "chroming" all that different from today's sexual predator lists?
"Politics of Motherhood" sounds fascinating! What's on the reading list? Have you read Gabrielle Palmer's
The Politics of Breastfeeding: When Breasts Are Bad for Business?
The Politics of Breastfeeding: When Breasts Are Bad for Business?


I think what Jordan does with this book is shine a spotlight on the politics of abortion in a way that makes the debate more accessible to people that may not be currently involved with it. The way she makes the punishment for the crime of abortion so visible in her story (chroming) I think will make the persecution of real women today that much more obvious to those who either don't get it, or don't care. Those of us who are already very pro-choice and have followed the issue in current news may not be shocked or enlightened by what happens to Hannah, but for someone who is not familiar with the struggle for women to have control over their own body this book may make them more aware of what really is going on today. For that reason I think the book is great.
Alexa have you seen Hell House? It's a documentary about a church in the US that puts on a haunted house every Halloween, but instead of your standard ghosts and ghoulies they scare you with women who have had abortions, unwed teen mothers, homosexuals dying of AIDS and tell you that if you do/are these things you will go to hell. It's pretty intense/outrageous. You can watch the trailer here.




The book was also rather horrid also. I really though Hannah was believable until toward the end. . I think the author tried to put too much into the book. From right wing Christian to Lesbian was a bit too much. I thought the book did very well until then.
The ending was predictable also

What about the book made it 'horrid' for you? The subject matter in general or the writing?



Yet in the end I was kind of disappointed that she made it so much about the chroming. After all, the minister doesn't come out and say that abortion and questions of faith should be personal decisions, all he says is that chroming is inhumane. Is it? For a true crime, is that a reasonable way for a society to punish? (Assuming "Fist" type activities are prevented.) Are sexual predator watch lists acceptable?

As for sexual predator lists, I will have to think a bit more about how I feel about them. In one sense, is it fair for a person to be branded a predator and have that reputation follow them everywhere regardless of whether they've done their time and/or reformed? But on the flip side does the public deserve to know when someone has a history of sexual violence and is/could still be dangerous? Chroming is an interesting concept. The idea of letting criminals free and relying on the prejudice of the public to shame them into behaving seems like a unique way to look at punishment. I'm not sure it would be a system that was 100% reliable. But would it be better than the for-profit prison system we have currently?

And yes for Aiden Dale to get off completely free from what he did bugged me. I kept waiting for Hannah to do something to punish him, but Hannah kept being the martyr here.
I guess in a way we do this to sexual predator,but I think we try to do it to protect people. As opposed the punishment side. I could be wrong here though.

I also think that it says a lot about Hannah's character, that she was so loyal. Perhaps loyal to the point of fault, but still.
Of course some of this is the framework of The Scarlet Letter from which she was working. There Hester gets all the blame but emerges the stronger because of it, while the minister is never revealed and dies from his guilt. (I thought Jordan "cheated" a bit by letting Dale survive his attack.)

Here are some thoughts below. I left all the spoilers in, since I'm almost a month overdue, and all you chickies are likely done and have moved on with your lives!
I really liked this book. And I echo all of the sentiments mentioned by all of you intelligent (and prepared/punctual) ladies above. I agree that this was very much a "message" book, and that the narrative suffered because of this. It's no Handmaid's Tale. But, that I still enjoyed it enough to recommend or read it again.
Like some of you, I really had a hard time with the sex scene between Hannah and Simone. It was not the "lesbian-ness" of the scene, I assure you. It wasn't too difficult to stretch my imagination around a Christian-turned-lesbian plot twist. I had a much harder time with the timing of the scene in relation to the recently-experienced trauma of Hannah's [possible or intended?] rape. That was too much for me.
I can even understand Hannah gaining an "attraction" to Simone after their bathtub scene. But, as a reader, I was really disturbed by the drugging and the bathing and the ouch-ing... A sweet love scene could've eased me out of it. But, a full-on horny sex scene? I was not on board for that, and thought it felt rushed, awkward... wrong.
When I first started reading this book, I felt as though there was some cookie-cutter characterization going on... most of which in the scenes that were dead-on The Scarlet Letter tributes. However, as the story branched away from that [limiting] structure, I really thought that Jordan's cast of characters became really unique and rich in detail - especially some of the characters in the Christian Reform House [forgetting the names, here], like the wife of headmaster (creep!), the group of pro-choice rebels [especially Simone & Victor], and [fogging on the name again!] The Guy Who Was Selling Girls Into Slavery/Restoring His House. All excellent.
I agree with Alexa, too, that Hillary Jordan kind of "cheated" her Scarlet Letter tribute by having Dale survive.
Have any of you guys started The Scarlet Letter? There are tons of similarities in this book... I felt like some of Jordan's lines are almost directly quoted.

And Rhiannon that is a really good point about the sex scene which I forgot about; it directly followed her drugging and attempted rape. It's pretty unlikely that someone who just endured such a traumatic event would be so eager to have sex so quickly afterwards, let alone such agressive/horny sex. That was another aspect to the scene that left me feeling it was unbelievable and tacked on. The clarity Hannah felt in that moment that initiating sex with Simone was what she wanted was unrealistic. I feel that she would have been much more hesitant, upset, confused, etc. Hannah was certainly portrayed as a strong-willed woman throughout the book, and perhaps the sex scene was meant to drive home the point that Hannah was refusing to be victimized by what happened to her... but still... it didn't seem likely that she would recover so fast.

I did not put the two situations together until I was reading what you said Rhiannon, and then it clicked. It was just more easily recognizable for me when I was actually seeing it all happen as opposed to reading it. Anyway, you are absolutely right. I almost wonder if Jordan realized herself that the placement was off, but did not know where else to throw it in. One of those ideas that you are adamant about keeping even if you cannot make it fit.... Also, if this is the case I wonder if maybe she was counting on it being less distinguishable because it is written and not visual.
All that said, the timing does seem completely off, though I am still happy it happened. Haha

I agree here, Stephanie! I think there would've been a hesitancy, it would've been gentler, and more awkward... if Jordan had wanted it to be more realistic.
Katie said: "I almost wonder if Jordan realized herself that the placement was off, but did not know where else to throw it in. One of those ideas that you are adamant about keeping even if you cannot make it fit..."
I thought the same thing, Katie! Hannah seemed kind of intrigued when she found out Simone was gay, so the author sort of set that up. But, then it was like she said..."Where to put it, where to put it? When will they be together again? How about the rescue scene?" Nah, didn't work out as intended...
Rhiannon, thanks so much for your detailed review; I really enjoyed the opportunity to go back and revisit what I loved and what I hated about the book. You are a very evocative writer!
I was actually pleasantly surprised by how I didn't see any attempt by Jordan to imitate Hawthorne. For me she simply took the bare bones of the structure and made no attempt to mimic his language, his irony or his vision. Of course so much of The Scarlet Letter concerns the relationship between Hester and Pearl, which is obviously completely missing here.
I was actually pleasantly surprised by how I didn't see any attempt by Jordan to imitate Hawthorne. For me she simply took the bare bones of the structure and made no attempt to mimic his language, his irony or his vision. Of course so much of The Scarlet Letter concerns the relationship between Hester and Pearl, which is obviously completely missing here.

I have to say that I felt so differently about the interactions between Hannah and Simone. I honestly thought it was one of the most poignant moments of the book. But I think I never looked at it as face-value sex. I think it served two purposes.
In the bathroom prior to the bath thing, Hannah realizes that she is weeping out of relief that she is alive and when she wakes in the morning she again recognizes her being for the first time as a Red. As a victim and a survivor I think initiating sex with Simone was really a confirmation of life (and not an uncommon one particularly for victims of rape.)
Secondly, I think it is the moment where she gains the strength to follow through with escaping to Canada and also gives the insight to know she can never be with Aidan again.
Let me also say that I thought the religious commentary in this book was as compelling as the political. It's such a beautiful indictment of modern day Evangelicals and Christianity but not an anti-God or atheist message.
LOL, Like I said, I really enjoyed this book.

Definitely an interesting take on the sex scene. I recently finished Mists of Avalon and there was a similar situation where a female character was raped, then rescued by her lover, who she then eagerly had sex with. I can see how for some women it might be comforting to be able to choose who she will have pleasurable sex with after having to endure forced/unpleasurable sex... but I'm still not really sold on the idea. I suppose some women deal with assault differently and we shouldn't write off that this is a possible reaction for some women... but it sure wouldn't be my reaction.
What are your thoughts??