Science and Inquiry discussion
General
>
Science Fun

I bow to your superior historical knowledge. Archimedes use of infinitesimals is still not clear to me, though. It may be that he understood something about them, but not it seems the abstract mathematical principles.
Ultimately, I you trying to tell me that Newton was not such a genius after all, as the Greeks already knew it all? That seems far fetched to me, particularly as they were obsessed with circular orbits of the planets around the sun.

It is very clear that I never told (nor even thought or infered) that Newton or modern geniuses were not geniuses. How could I? Your conclusion is totally illogical and it displeases me. I was just explaining something whose only aim was to give further and more correct information about Archimedes and the Greeks and their actual knowledge. We're in a science group, and I defend correct information. This should be welcome first, and then a proper and serious discussion may start, with open minds and politeness.
However, this is the "science fun" thread and this is completely off topic here. I won't go on.

There is no doubt of Archimedes prowess as a mathematician, scientist and engineer. However, the article indicates without evidence that he discovered infinitesimals. I very much doubt that t..."
You're taking a fun article pretty seriously, aren't you? I thought it was kind of cool, but subject to hyperbole like all such.

You're right, I took it seriously. I'm very much a binary person I suppose: something is right or it's wrong.

Down playing the greek contributions to mathematics is a bit arogant. They didn't really have the mathematic language that we do. To put it in perspective imagine Pythagoras sitting in his garden doodling with a stick in the dirt. This is how he worked out Pi without arabic numerals. He was surely smarter than me.

If your message was addressed to me, I certainly haven't been "downplaying" Greek mathematics. I try to state the facts as I see them, and arrogance can't come into it as I'm not as smart as any of these people anyway: ancient or modern! So I haven't contributed one iota (nice Greek saying!) to maths understanding. I'm smarter than our Prime Minister Dave Cameron, though!
Newton said something like "if I have been able to see further than anyone else, it's because I have been standing on the shoulders of giant men". And so it has gone on throughout history with some unfortunate periods in Earth history when a lot of material may have needed to have been discovered.
I don't argue that Archimedes was a genius, the equal of anyone we have on Earth today. I have only argued about one aspect of his precise contribution to mathematics. I have already been correctly told off for trying to be too precise.
Finally, to say that the Greeks didn't have the mathematical language of today really puts the cart before the horse. To develop new mathematics you first have to develop new notation and see the need for new language. That's what Newton did in a lot of things (and, yes, I suppose Archimedes before him). In particular both Newton and Leibniz developed precise language and notation for infinitesimals and calculus. I don't know what your hangup with pi is all about, it really doesn't address the infinitesimal issue.
Even as recently as the early 20th century, Einstein needed new mathematics for describing General Relativity. By digging around he already found that the notation existed but in a relatively obscure branch of differential geometry.
I would guess that if the mathematicians hadn't already come up with ways of describing curved space, using co- and contra-variant vectors and tensors, Einstein would have invented in. Of course all that propelled differential geometry into the limelight.

http://web.archive.org/web/2002102322...
Some animals were named after beloved or hated personalities, others have weirdy sounding names.. and so on.
Campsicnemius charliechaplini Evenhuis, 1996 (dolichopodid fly) "Etymology: This species is named in honor of the great silent movie comedian, Charlie Chaplin, because of the curious tendency of this fly to die with its midlegs in a bandy-legged position."
Boselaphus tragocamelus (Pallas) (nilgai, an Indian antelope) This translates to "ox-deer goat-camel"
Subbuteo (a British table soccer game) named after the small bird of prey Falco subbuteo. Peter Adolph, the game's inventer, wanted to call the game "Hobby", which is the bird's common name.


Pythagoras aproximated a perfect circle by tessellating the trisections of the equal sides of a polygon. He realized that each tessellation brought him closer to a circle, while still giving a side length which he could calculate.
Mathematically, he could do this an infinite number of times without reaching zero.

It is you who is making the step from the procedure of Pythagoras to an understanding of infinity and infinitesimals.
It is not clear that the Greeks themselves knew that the process would converge, for example, to give a value of pi. After all it was only relatively recently, I don't know when, that the concepts of rational numbers versus irrational numbers versus transcendental numbers was understood. The Greeks might easily have thought that there was a "perfect polygon" which computed pi. That would have made pi rational. We don't even know if the Greeks understood the concept of convergence. They may have empirically concluded that the process converges, which may have been good enough at the time.
I mentioned Zeno's paradox. This is an important issue because for Achilles to beat the Tortoise, he needs to complete an infinite number of steps in a finite time. Presumably you don't have a maths degree, but if you did then you would appreciate that this isn't as trivial as it sounds. That's why the ancient Greeks had trouble with the paradox despite Kikyosan's dismissal of the problem.
Obviously the Greeks "engineering and observational" skills could see that Achilles could beat the tortoise, but mathematically they couldn't resolve the paradox. i.e., they didn't understand infinitesimals.
I think in the end, we don't really know how much ancient philosophers knew apart from the basics. Our current scientific and mathematical knowledge is based on traceable standards via the scientific literature. Even if the Greeks had a similar method (which I doubt) a lot of the material has been lost.
Please, people. This thread is about "Science Fun". This is not the place for an argument about how much ancient philosophers knew. If you want to discuss it, fine, but start a new thread. Any future posts on his topic will be deleted.

Well, pictures of scientists cheering are a bit cheesy, so not not all of the 20 pictures are good!
There was another one in the NASA collection showing the Pluto/Charon pair. I have it on my website http://www.enigmascientific.com/news

A Unique Ellptical Pool Table and Loop Game Designed by a Mathematician
It works until "annoying physics" gets in the way.
It works until "annoying physics" gets in the way.

https://www.sciencenews.org/search?st..."
Thanks for the link. The new tree of life is mind boggling- It certainly blew my mind!

https://grahamcluley.com/2015/08/wind...


http://www.cracked.com/article_22666_...
Warning, it is Cracked.com. Profanity & boobs are pretty much to be expected. Generally NSFW unless you are the Sys Admin with your office door (the server room door) closed.
;)

http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_16...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3...
but I found "Schrödinger’s Cat, a Feynman Inspired View" more interesting.
https://naturallyinconsistent.wordpre...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sp...
Hummingbird tongues are way weirder than we thought.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sp...

http://www.gadgetify.com/skates-boots...

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2...

http://i.imgur.com/yLamcfC.png
When I was a child I hated this (well, still now, actually): to find a butter cookies can, open it and discover sewing supplies.
only ONCE in my life I did find cookies and it was the best day ever.

http://www.popsci.com/missed-spacex-l...

http://www.slate.com/articles/video/v...

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016...

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovatio...
How it was done:
http://www.redbull.com/us/en/music/st...
Books mentioned in this topic
What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions (other topics)What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions (other topics)
What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions (other topics)
mycellium running: how mushrooms can help save the world (other topics)
The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Mushrooms (other topics)
A post scriptum @John:
Greeks were not only Zeno. Zeno was a philosopher of Parmenides'school (read about School of Elea) who used to "play" with absurd and paradoxes. They used sophisms to contest others' theories. Unfortunately later philosophers were not so creative, so they couldn't break the influence of those sophisms. Infinite became a taboo. But then Archimedes solved it with his mechanical method.
Archimede did use infinitesimals (read about his solids, surfaces, polygons, lines, very illuminating and heuristic). But when Dark Ages came, most of Greek knowledge were consigned to oblivion. Until the Science's rebirth in XVII-XVIII century. (this is valid for too many disciplines, unfortunately)