Pulp Fiction discussion
General
>
Currently Reading



Like the look of 'Squid Pulp Blues' in particular. And FREE!! It's a win-win:)


There were lots of things to be said against the girl, but in her favor was the fact that she could and did read.
I gave it 4 stars & reviewed it here:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

♥,
Cat at Galaxy Press
We have a promotion zone, if this is what you are interested in.
Shanghai is a good location for some noir crime, I think I have a few titles saved somewhere on a wishlist, and I remember the movie Lust, Caution.
Shanghai is a good location for some noir crime, I think I have a few titles saved somewhere on a wishlist, and I remember the movie Lust, Caution.


I read the Ripley series sometime ago Frank & enjoyed them immensely. Such a different take on a sociopath.

I'm re-reading Whip Hand by Dick Francis, and a few years ago I would not normally include it in the hard-boiled genre, but I am struck how it does include a lot of the private investigator staples : Sid Halley is a former champion jockey who lost his hand in a steeplechase accident. He's now a private investigator of crime in and around the racing world. He's got the shattered personal life, he has to put up with goons who believe violence can make him abandon his quest, he does the dreary footwork investigating clues.



Detour by Martin M. Goldsmith was written in 1939 & made into a short (apparently quite famous) Noir movie in 1945.
"The book, subtitled An Extraordinary Tale, was published by the Macaulay Company. Its plot is similar to the movie to which it was later adapted, except that the main character's name was changed from "Alexander Roth" to "Al Roberts," and erotic passages were removed.
The novel ends with much the same fatalistic line used in the movie: "God or Fate or some mysterious force can put the finger on you or on me for no good reason at all." In the film version of the novel, the reference to God is removed.
The film Detour has achieved considerable acclaim as a defining movie of the film noir era, despite its low budget. However, the novel, long out of print, did not have the same fate."
The movie is available for viewing on You Tube, as it was released into the 'public arena'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHyXW...


Detour by Martin M. Goldsmith was written in 1939 & made into a short (apparently quite famous) Noir movie in 1945.
"The book, subtitled An Extra..."
Interesting. I remember seeing the film quite a while back. Never knew it was based on a book.


Detour by Martin M. Goldsmith was written in 1939 & made into a short (apparently quite famous) Noir movie in 1945.
"The book, subti..."
Got a copy of the movie yesterday Franky, despite it being free to view. I think the book would be better than the movie. That's usually the case. I prefer to treat movies based on books as a completely separate entity, rather than comparing them in the same context. Although i thought the movie of 'The Big Sleep' was quite faithful to Chandler's book, so there are exceptions.

Certainly a must see for anyone into Noir films

Certainly a must see for anyon..."
Interesting perspective Kipp. In a way, i prefer a different perspective to be taken between the movie & book. Re; His viewpoint in the movie; her's in the book. Makes me more interested in viewing both, knowing that.


Finished

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
2 stars

http://everythingnoir.com/

Got the book Bryan, but haven't got around to it yet.

Its always a pleasure to walk the weird number street of NYC with Scudder. This book doesnt disspoint and frankly im getting tired of writing reviews that praise the books in the series that just keep getting stronger.
I almost wish for an okay Scudder book so i could say this wasnt great book in the series as usual ;)

But I would like to warn readers it contains graphic violence reminiscent of Taratino's Reservoir Dogs so it is NOT for squeamish lightweights.

But I would like to warn readers it contains graphic violence reminiscent of Taratino's Reservoir Dogs so it is NOT for squeamish lightweights."
I have read this book and the next Hopkins book in the series. It was enough to put me off Ellroy and never read his more famous crime books. I found it to be generic macho crime, the lead....... I have forgotten the books already.
I will give him a fair chance since he is pretty respected writer in the modern field.

The last book of his i (tried) to read, i actually gave up, it was so bad. Something about Howard Hughes/Bay of Pigs/CIA, blah, blah. I forget it's title.





That's the one with the Grofeld character, isn't it? I kept 'looking around' wondering what Parker was up to. But i still enjoyed it.
Have you read the Dortmunder series by Westlake Jim? I haven't read all of them, but i intend to eventually. Bit of light relief after Parker. Whew!!

But I would like to warn readers it contains graphic violence reminiscent of Taratino's Reservoir Dogs so it is NOT for squeamish lightweights."
I..."
Have you read the L.A. Quartet, starting with (The Black Dahlia/The Big Nowhere/L.A. Confidential & White Jazz) Mohammed? Highly recommend you read these, perhaps before tackling more of the Hopkins books. The Quartet was my intro to Ellroy.


Dortmunder is Parker in the way he works but the tone of the stories are more comic like Grofield. Its a wonderful contrast to read fun capers that is more comic, not as bleak heist noir ala Parker.
I feel weird laughing at the funny comic crime of Westlake while Parker in the hands of Richard Stark is so cold, almost scary in his mean,cold ways.

But I would like to warn readers it contains graphic violence reminiscent of Taratino's Reservoir Dogs so it is NOT for squeamish ..."
The only reason i havent dismissed the idea of reading Ellroy again is because his LA Quartet is so acclaimed among fans similar to me. Too many readers whose taste,judgment i respect like you guys here in this group.

Dortmunder is Parker in the way he works ..."
Yes, i agree re: Westlake/Stark. Almost like a split personality. Westlake wrote under several pseudonyms in the course of his career.
When i read my first Parker novel, i was hooked. He is a total bastard, but his character is so different from any i'd read before, i found those books to be very compelling.
I've read all but 1 of the Parker novels, but i read them out of order. Re-read The Hunter (Parker #1) & will probably read them all again eventually, now i have the whole collection.

Someone posted a comment about Jonathan Craig & i think mentioned his book 'Alley Girl' & i'm blowed if i can find the post again. But for anyone interested, here are some of his eBooks free on the Munsey's site:
http://www.munseys.com/detail/mode/au...
They're quite well formatted for their age & all have covers, which is a rarity for Munsey's.

Dortmunder is Parker in ..."
I have read the first 14-15 Parker books in order and im saving the last 8 more contemporary books. Parker is mean bastard but he is great like New York Times called him a perfect"No Hero". He is too icecold, amoral for being anti-hero. Recently he made it in a list of my all-time Top 10 favourite Literary characters. I love reading him for his cold ways.
Only other Noir,PI character in the same league for me in my affections is The Op, Matt Scudder,Jack Taylor.

Dortmunder ..."
Re; the latter Parker books. As the series moves into the 70's, Parker started to seem like a man (or rather a character) who was starting to seem like an anachronism. By the late 70'-early 80's Stark was starting to introduce police computers & cell phones into the Parker stories & it jarred for me. I always think of Parker as being very low tech. The blunt instrument. Technology seemed out of place for me.
In addition, though it doesn't interfere with my enjoyment of the Parker novels, Parker never ages. These novels span some 30 years, but Parker always seems to be around his early 40's. It's a testament to Stark/Westlake's talent as a writer, that his novels can span 30 years & yet the contradiction of Parker's age is not odd. That seems very cool to me.

Thats one of the reasons im weary of reading the last books because the 70s which was the last book Butcher's Moon for 20+ years it is still many decades ago technology wise. I mean i was just reading Scudder book 10 from 1992 and thats million years before internet,emails,wiki in your mobile phone. Scudder was using primitive hacking help from computer geeks.
So 70s Parker using telephone didnt bother me. But in 2000s Parker the police have much better technology, ways to get theifs in seconds during a robbery. Stark/Westlake is great writer so he can make it work anyway im sure.
The aging never bothered me because Parker is always only about the work, his personal life you rarely see. I can see it as he worked 15 jobs in 10+years time. The 30 years the book span can be 10 years in his life. He did work a few times per year to get money to live his kind of calm life between jobs.
speaking of neo-noir and noir influences in fantasy books, I am reading now City of Stairs by Robert Jackson Bennett. I find it refreshingly that it is not about contemporary, supernatural detectives but a fully developed and original secondary world, bringing politics, personal entanglements and history into the investigation of a murder.

After about three thrillers in a row, I'm up for a change of pace. So I'm starting in on The Alien Years by Robert Silverberg. Close encounters gone amok.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

It kind of has a "trashier version of Ross Macdonald" thing going on in both the writing style and "seemingly idyllic Southern California small town that's hopelessly corrupt beneath the surface" setting, obviously not as good as him but it's still very entertaining.
I haven't tried any Elvis Cole yet, but I keep hearing good things about the series.
\
Right now I'm into Moth by James Sallis
\
Right now I'm into Moth by James Sallis
Books mentioned in this topic
The Little Sister (other topics)What Does It Feel Like? (other topics)
Pop. 1280 (other topics)
If He Hollers Let Him Go (other topics)
The Reformatory (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Raymond Chandler (other topics)Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Naomi Alderman (other topics)
M. John Harrison (other topics)
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. (other topics)
More...
I picked this up at New York Comic Con back in October and had a chance to chat with the creator. He's really passionate about the pulp genre and wanted to create a strong female pulp action heroine.
It's a quick read that can be incredibly dark with a twinge of horror. The lead character is a woman spy for the Allies. She's a master of disguise and battles the Japanese during WW2. There's black and white illustrations peppered throughout ask well. They have that scratchy feel from the old pulp novels. Interested to see what you guys think of it!