The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion

This topic is about
Presumed Innocent
Historical Group Reads
>
Jan/Feb 2012 Group Read: Presumed Innocent

I want to read the sequel



I remember really liking this book. I've gotten bogged down on his The Laws of Our Fathers.
He was heavily involved in the review the then governor (now inmate) was doing into the death penalty. And, as far as I know, he is still doing occasional legal work with his firm in Chicago.

I read it a very long time ago, and saw the movie too. I remember liking both of them very much. May have to do a re-read of this.

Anyway, I just started re-reading this last night...didn't get too far in yet. Now I may have to re-watch the movie, also!
Tomorrow officially kicks off the group read...woot!




I agree.

I'm looking forward to reading the sequel now.


I hung in until page 50 and gave up. Maybe I am not a courtroom mystery woman. I have tried 3 different authors doing courtroom mysteries and didn't care for a single one.




If court stories aren't your thing, I wouldn't force myself. If I can't get into a book by a certain point, I just give it up. Time is too precious to waste it on a book you don't like. Goodness knows that there is enough that you have to do.

I don't hate it. And I don't want to make a judgment when I'm barely 30 pages into it. I'm going to give it a bit longer before I decide. I'm just glad that I didn't buy this.


Laurin, that is why I quit on that book. The wife/affair. I just wanted the crime. I like all of the series you listed, Stephanie Plum, James Patterson, and I haven't tried Harlen Coben's books. I read the The Lincoln Lawyer and forced myself through that book.

Laurin, that is why I quit on that book...."
I like his individual books. Like Tell No One. I read that at about 13, and it really got me into books of that genre. I started Deal Breaker, which is a part of a series that he wrote, I don't know if I like it.
I will say, I do like this author's writing style. It's to the point, but descriptive enough to not be boring. Since I got past that part about the affair, I'm enjoying it more. To me, crime books should be like an episode of Law & Order. Focus mainly on the victim and solving the crime, but have a bit of a back story to keep it interesting.



Is Sabich really an innocent victim or the perpetrator of a violent crime? Or perhaps, maybe the victim's lifestyle choices led to her untimely death?

Laurin, that is why I quit on that book...."
The wife/affair is necessary to the book. It is not extraneous material.

Agreed.

Laurin, that is why I qu..."
That's good to know. I'm not very far into it, and the book just felt bogged down with it.

I am not fond of someone who cheats, either. But, as Gatorman pointed out, the affair and his obsession with Carolyn are essential to the story. It is the first seed planted that makes you question his character.



It's not straying far from the plot at all. It's essential to the plot, regardless of how you feel about Rusty cheating on his wife.

You're not supposed to like what goes on the book. It's filled with people of questionable character making bad decisions and the consequences of those decisions, leading to moral ambiguity. That's what makes the book so compelling.

I didn't care for sexual details offered in the book.
I liked the friendship between Lipranzer and Sabich.

I know a lot of successful attorneys. They can be very immature!
Books mentioned in this topic
Presumed Innocent (other topics)Fear the Worst (other topics)
Pleading Guilty (other topics)
No Time for Goodbye (other topics)
Deal Breaker (other topics)
More...
Valerie will be leading the discussion.
Thank you Valerie!