Reading the Classics discussion
General
>
What are you reading?
message 1251:
by
Jan
(new)
May 10, 2016 03:37PM

reply
|
flag









&


I'm starting The Hobbit














They were:
The Mysterious Affair at Styles

Peril at End House

Three Act Tragedy

I also read these Grimm stories:








The version I'm listening to is narrated by Roger Rees, Rosalyn Landor, John Lee, & Judy Geeson.

Also read a nice stack of twenty-some sequential Uncanny X-Men comics from the early eighties (mostly the "bug arc," as hubby calls it -- i.e., the Brood story), that hubby picked up for next to nothing at a garage sale. I can still see why comics appealed to my past self, and also why I quit reading them, so all in all a nice trip down memory lane.

Anyhow, I'm rereading 'Little Dorrit' with a group on GR. I got behind unfortunately so I'm playing catch-up. Also I have many books on hold. Some are half way through like Tolstoy's Karenina and War & Peace and Of Human Bondage. I tend to jump from one thing to the next before finishing so I'm trying to be more self-disciplined! :-)

It's a BBC series, actually. I'm watching Season I; Season II is being broadcast right now, I believe. I quite liked Richard II; somewhat less enthused about Henry IV part one, however I'm not sure if that's because there were different production crews or because of the plays themselves. Richard II was visually symbolic in a way that Henry IV part one wasn't, but I don't think the style of Richard II would have worked with Henry IV, even if the same guys had done both.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2262456/
I am also very bad about jumping from one thing to another. I set down the last of the sequential Anne books halfway through and let it sit for a month or more. Just picked it up and resumed it this week; fortunately it's a re-read, or I'd probably have to start all over! I've got a Tarzan book floating around I'm only a few chapters into, and I don't know how many non-fiction library books I'm in the middle of (I keep a record of what page I'm on with my library list).
Sometimes I think reading multiple books at once is a dreadful habit I should work harder to break, but other times I think I end up reading more books that way. I often set books aside while I'm processing something they brought up (new ideas, with non-fiction; often technique -- or lack thereof -- with fiction, where I'm trying to figure why something works or doesn't) ; I seem to be able to process that book while reading this one, so as long as I get back to the first maybe it's not such a bad thing.

Next up, The War of Worlds.

Just finished re-reading Farley Mowat's Never Cry Wolf, which I still enjoy, but which kind of irritates me because he presented it as factual. I'm about halfway through Ivanhoe, my other "purse-sized paperback" right now. Middle daughter was trapped in the orthodontist's waiting room with me when I hit the jousting tournament, and I kept reading bits to her, pointing and laughing at how ludicrous it all was, until she got exasperated enough to say, "Mom, if it's that bad, just read something else."
But for all the inaccuracies make me laugh, I'm enjoying it, pretty much. I generally don't expect historical fiction to be accurate anyhow, to be honest. Few authors really get into the heads of people of another time, so I'm happy so long as I don't get thrown out of the book by a blatant anachronism (someone in the 1500s looking at a wristwatch, for instance). Ivanhoe is probably not the best choice for my first Sir Walter Scott book, but I guess we'll both survive.



I have just finished Dostoyevsky's The Brothers Karamazov which was fabulous and Maugham's Of Human Bondage which I enjoyed.
I hope to finish The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins and to read Far from the Madding Crowd by Hardy.



Hi! I read Clarissa Last year, and I liked it. I thought the book was well written and the characters were very interesting. Lovelace is an amazing anti-hero. Besides the romance, the book depictures, extremely well, how difficult life was for women in XVIII century, even if the women were rich.
The only problem is its length. The book is too, too big. In think Richardson dragged the story, he could have told the same story with less words.
I also have Pamela to read, but I have the feeling I won’t like it so much, although it does have one advantage over Clarissa… it’s much shorter!
Enjoy your reading.


https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...




I'm sorry things are at a low point for this group. It was good for the short time I've been a member.

I loved that book!"
It is one of the great classics. I loved East of Eden even more, though.
If this group is still in business, I'd like to nominate "Mr. Norris Changes Trains by Christopher Isherwood.






Ok, I need to ask: Is there anything good about these books?
I thought about reading them several times, but everytime I look at them and I can't help thinking "Life is to short for this".

“A Distant Mirror” by Barbara Tuchman. A history of 14th century Europe. With plagues, wars, crusades and great social upheaval the book is indeed a mirror for our own difficult times. Sometimes the history is quite unreal and at other times very very familiar.
A very long but rewarding read.
A very long but rewarding read.
Books mentioned in this topic
To Build a Fire (other topics)Passing (other topics)
Passing (other topics)
A Good Time for the Truth: Race in Minnesota (other topics)
The Secret Life of Bees (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Frederick Douglass (other topics)Richard Powers (other topics)
Ann Patchett (other topics)
Louise Erdrich (other topics)
Charles Dickens (other topics)
More...