Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell
2012 Group Read discussions
>
Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell-read? Going to read? No spoilers please!
message 1:
by
Jeanne
(last edited Feb 04, 2012 02:50PM)
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Feb 04, 2012 02:43PM

reply
|
flag
I've had it on my shelf for some time now, think I will give it a go.




I will try to join in the discussion, but will probably not re-read it.


In terms of movies, does it look or sound like "The Prestige" or " The Illusionist" I like them both

I have this on my iPod, I shall try to make time to listen. Bought it as a bargain, no idea what it's like though!



Update 2/13/12
I've just started it and I am having trouble staying focused on the reader. As others have stated...it's kinda boring even when someone else is doing the reading.
Update 2/21/12
Not going to finish this, can't stay interested. Sorry.


In terms of movies, does it look or sound like "The Prestige" or " The Illusionist" I like them both"
Did you know The Prestige is also a book?
This book is different but similar I guess. I read it awhile ago and might reread it because I don't remember it too good. It's also similar to The Night Circus and strange as it might seem the movie Amadeus, in the idea of one sided hatred and jealousy.


In terms of movies, does it look or sound like "The Prestige" or " The Illusionist" I like them both"
Did you know [book:The Prestige|..."
thank you, and no I didn't know it's a book, I liked the movie so hopefully I'll like this book



I think it comes down to your tolerance for the language of 19th century comedies of manners. Mine of which, apparently, is quite high because I did enjoy the book.


I couldn't get into it in either format. One thing that kept getting to me was the footnotes. Sometimes they were pages long & often more interesting than the story.

I'm not sure it's a book for fantasy lovers. I see it more as an historical fiction or alt. history or a cultural fantasy. It has magic, sure, but it's almost used as a power metaphor or a means to advance the plot. I think it's more about what the early 19th century English were like and uses a number of literary styles from 19th century authors like Dickens and Austen as a means. The footnotes almost put magic on a scientific basis, science as a 19th century discipline. Even the Faery aspects were most English and as such were real to the period and not really fantasy. I don't think it deals with good vs evil, like most fantasy, but more with logic vs emotion sort of like Kirk vs Spock, but much grayer.
Personally I found the prose wonderful, and also the pictures painted in nearly overwhelming detail. I don't think it's a book you can read once for story and engaging characters. It's one of those books than can be read several times concentrating on different aspects. For me it needs to be. I never really get such books on 1 read.

The story is bad, the plot goes nowhere slowly, the prose is a pretentious version of trying to be 19th century literature, the characters are not very well developed, and the footnotes are ridiculous. Like someone said above, only the last 100 pages or so are interesting in any way.
I'm always flabbergasted at how highly people rate this book.

Having said that, I always fancied going back and finishing it some time. This might be a good time to do it.




That's an interesting detail. I didn't realise that it was historically based. It makes the story that much more interesting.



March 1.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Last Unicorn (other topics)Something Happened (other topics)
The Prestige (other topics)
The Night Circus (other topics)