The Challenge Factory discussion
♦Factory Archives♦
>
○ Review Writing Q & A
date
newest »

message 1:
by
~Jennifer~
(last edited Feb 24, 2012 02:56PM)
(new)
Feb 24, 2012 02:47PM

reply
|
flag

How much info is too much when writing the summary?"
I'd like to ask almost the same: How much info do I need to write? I mean, my reviews are very short :/

One: Write a short (1-2 short paragraphs) summary without giving away any major spoilers... but the 'opposition' to this says don't necessarily do this for every book unless you are writing reviews for a blog, or some other place that does not offer the blurb/description already (or readily available.) If you are writing reviews only for GoodReads or Amazon, then they post the blurb before the reviews so people don't need to see it again






I write a review of every book I read ... or have for the last 5 years or so. I usually start with a couple of sentences about the book WITHOUT any spoilers. You could even just copy some of the dust jacket info (of course, giving credit)
Then I write about what I liked and didn't like about the book. If it's an audiobook I make sure to also comment about the performance of the audio.
You can see an example of a shorter review here:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
One of my longer reviews:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Hope that helps.


This depends so much on the purpose of the review. Are you reviewing for a publication, website, or blog? Are you writing for a school project? Are you just recording your thoughts as a reminder for yourself, and perhaps a help to friends?
My reviews are how I felt about the book. It's like a note to myself so that I remember the big picture when the sequel drops a year later (Since every book has a sequel these days, LOL)

So my question is how do you write a review for a book that's between 60 - 170 pages long?

So my question is how do you write a review for a book that's between 60 - 170 pages long?"
Same way I write a review of a book that is 900 pages long. I give a brief plot summary (2 or 3 sentences, MAX), then comment about the characters, the themes, the writing, the style, my reactions, etc....


Reviewing is pretty subjective. You do it how you feel most comfortable doing it. If you're ok with reviewing mid-series, go for it! No one here is going to say you're wrong for doing so, though there are some that might disagree with your desire to do so. (I'm one of them, but it's my OCD telling me to read the other three books first and just make notes for reviewing the 4th until I get the prior three read.) It's totally a "you do you, boo" situation!


No, you should avoid summaries and things that could spoil the book for others! How I review is by saying what I liked about the characters, the plot, that kind of thing. If I didn't like things, I mention that as well, but don't trash the author while you do it!

Perhaps a preface note saying that #4 is dependent on key plot lines from books 1 - 3 and cannot be read as a stand alone.
Reviews are definitely subjective, I would only add that I get annoyed by reviewers that cannot separate the author from their characters. That is, just because an author creates a character that is racist, sexist, misogynistic etc, it doesn't mean the author personally is, which links into Trea's comment about not trashing an author.