Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Bulletin Board
>
Acquiring an Agent
date
newest »


same publishers won't accept your work without agents. don't know why they don't want to be the ones in charge of you, but i guess they fine to pay higher rates because of agents, but that isn't my cup of tea.

If you're writing a series or have 10 books in your head that you're trying to get on paper, it's really hard to find the time to market yourself. Either you do marketing full time or you write full time...but doing both is difficult. If your books are good enough to attract the attention of an agent, but the sales just aren't coming...then you probably should hire them.
But...just because you want an agent doesn't mean you can get one because unless you are paying them a retainer...which I don't think anyone does...they won't waste their time on a book that they don't think they can sell en mass. They don't make money unless you make A LOT of money. Its really a win/win in many cases. ;-)
But, if you have the time/patience/connections/etc. to do your marketing on your own...you definitely can!
Good luck!!!


I don't know why a dead cert needs such a team, but I do know this attitude leaves me no choice but to go it alone. The downside is I suspect sales volumes will be very low regardless of the merits - or lack of them - of my book. This is because there are so many others trying the same method after giving up on agents. That, plus blogging, means there is an overwhelming amount of literature available to readers. This is also why so many newspapers and magazines are struggling.
The bottom line is I would love to have an agent do the selling work on my behalf. Even having a reputable agent give me an honest opinion that my book is not "good enough" would be helpful. As neither of these things is likely to happen, I will soldier on and hope my book strikes a chord with the public. I would advise other authors who don't have an agent to do likewise. Good luck.





I hope you reported this person for giving out bogus ratings. Trashing the competition doesn't help anyone, it just makes the person talking trash look bad.
Doc

http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?page_...
He thinks (and I agree) that agents are useless now. If you went to his workshops in the past, he taught you to send your manuscripts directly to editors - yes, even at trad.pubbers in NY.
Even if you get a trad.pubber, don't hire an agent to negotiate your contract, hire an IP lawyer - agents will make you sign very unfavorable contracts because they don't know better.
Remember, anyone with a card can be an agent. They might mean well, but won't be able to help you in your publishing career.
Best wishes!
(and yeah, I'm with Doc about what M.L. wrote, we should all give that person one star reviews! ;-p)


I did notify Goodreada Doc but have not heard back- it's a tremendous amount of work and expense to self market as you all know- to be shot down by someone who has 4 reviews since being published 2 years ago- not wiling to work as hard as others but more than willing to give bogus reviews instead to help her book appear better-


The publisher is small, however, with zero marketing budget. Unfortunately instead of honing the next novel I have been promoting HACK - very time consuming. However I have come up with some very effective awareness generators that I would be happy to share if you're interested.
I've also had some serendipitous timing. The Huffington Post Book blog has asked me to guest blog about my first agent. You can read about Melanie Mills here - I think you will see why the HuffPo is interested: it's a very bizarre TRUE story. http://bit.ly/rt30ea (I also like to think that they like the writing!)
Now, over a year later after signing the contract with the publisher, HACK will hit the literal and virtual shelves mid-June! Today a Tweeter in India retweeted a promotional video for HACK (http://on.fb.me/KF61aP) to over 600 followers in India. So - watch out Bollywood! Yahoo!

i guess everyone would be interested to hear about your "effective awareness generators".



One thing I do wonder is if publishers ever check out the indie authors on Amazon etc. They could bypass agents that way.

an indie writer if they are extremely successful may show up on a best-seller list for example, then a Big publisher may notice ...( they are not in the business of taking risks,) and then they offer a royalty of 7% on books and 25% on ebooks to the person who did all the work to get there. There are some excellent subsidy deals that give an author 50% on both book and ebook... and they put a professional cover, editing, etc into the book.

Anyone here on GoodReads have experience of that?

Anyone here on GoodReads have experience of that?"
I'm afraid Amanda Hocking is one of a kind! ;-) No, there are a couple more, but they are exceptions.
I like David's parallel with the music industry, but I don't think agents are like managers. Agents are really needed only if you write screenplays and want to break into Hollywood. If not, submit to editors of big publishing houses, or self-publish a print book and send it to editors, apparently they're less likely to throw away a printed book than a manuscript.
Anybody with a card can be an agent. Writers don't need them anymore. They need IP lawyers to negotiate contracts with publishers, that's all.
Best to all!





Spot on, David. I've had a very similar experience in the music biz, and it's so cool that it's all opened up and we can make records and books and put them out there! Wish I could just do that all that time - life would be grand, wouldn't it!

I mean "wouldn't it??"

When I wrote my first book, I wasted over a year trying to find and agent. What I learned was that agents are salesmen/women, poor salesmen/women. Unlike a used car salesman an agent wants to make sure he/she can sell your book before they take it on, they want a sure ting.
Personally, I think they will be out of jobs in the near future. I have now self-published nine books and can't imagine why anyone, in this day and age of e-books, would want to go the traditional route and work for someone else.
Personally, I think they will be out of jobs in the near future. I have now self-published nine books and can't imagine why anyone, in this day and age of e-books, would want to go the traditional route and work for someone else.

It IS an absolutely wonderful world of write 'em and self-publish 'em. All the time and energy one spends on legacy publishing is a drain . . . when you could be writing your next eBook.

http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=6876
and
http://jakonrath.blogspot.it/2012/05/...

http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=6876
and
http://jakonrath.blogspot.it/2012/05/..."
Thanks for those links, Barbara. Dean Wesley Smith lays it right out in plain English.

I would say no. I still don't understand why anyone who has a choice, and we all do, would go the traditional route. I have one of my self-published book in the library. I don't care to have print copies in a bookstore. My print copies are on lulu.com in large print and a are doin just fine without an agent or publisher. Yeah11

but it would probably do better if it's also in walmarkt and other shops. to more exposure you get the better it is. is not like you couldn't get a paperback-only deal like john lock and others to get into these shop and to use the ebook version solely for yourself.
Books mentioned in this topic
Anywhere But Here (other topics)Blurry (other topics)
Quarantine (other topics)
Matthew R. Horn
www.matthewrhorn.com