May 2017

I’m having a new experience this month. My latest novel, New Boy, is not an historical novel – unless you think 1974 is history. To me it feels like yesterday, since I lived through it. Indeed, I was 11 in 1974, same age as the characters in the book. I had lots of fun being nostalgic about Partridge Family lunchboxes and Big Buddy bubblegum while I was writing the book. (For a little hit of that nostalgia, have a look here.)


Now, during the promotion, I’m getting asked a lot about my childhood, going to an integrated school in Washington DC, playground politics, and the casual racism of the 1970s. It has made me realize how much writing books set in the distant past has sheltered me from all of that personal scrutiny. For instance, I have never been asked if I resemble the maid Griet in Girl with a Pearl Earring, or Quaker Honor Bright in The Last Runaway. Readers don’t assume I have had the experiences those characters have, since they took place in 17th-century Holland and 19th-century Ohio. Actually, though, I think there is indirectly quite a lot of me in both of them, camouflaged behind a historical setting.


Now, having peeked out at the contemporary world, I am heading back to my hiding place, this time in Winchester in the 1930s, sprinkling the odd drop of myself into my heroine, Violet. When you read it in a few years, maybe you’ll recognize those drops.


partridge family lunchbox two

18 likes ·   •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 18, 2017 01:53
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Connie (new)

Connie This is great! It's so relatable recalling the 'joys' of 1970's adolescent playground politics. But my mom wouldn't let me have the cool lunchbox...I had the generic red plaid box, and an uncanny ability to inexplicably break my thermos insert.

I'm enjoying "New Boy"--when I've had the chance to read it; the revisioning of classics is so fascinating. Your protagonist, Dee, is such a very complete young girl, though occasionally she's older than eleven...which is expected, I think all adolescent girls straddle the age and wisdom lines.

Most certainly, we always write a bit part of ourselves into our characters, especially the protagonists, no matter what their environment or gender, yet I wonder what part of me I reveal in the character of a hapless, stubborn female demon-underling. (Yikes.) Maybe I'm a little more 'spice' than 'sugar'?


message 2: by Tracy (new)

Tracy Chevalier Connie wrote: "This is great! It's so relatable recalling the 'joys' of 1970's adolescent playground politics. But my mom wouldn't let me have the cool lunchbox...I had the generic red plaid box, and an uncanny a..."

Hi Connie-- I deliberately set out to make Dee and Mimi more rounded characters. If I'm allowed to criticize Shakespeare (!), he sometimes underwrote his female characters. I always wanted to hear more from Desdemona and Emilia in Othello; now they get their chance.

Dee is quite knowing. But do you remember 6th grade and how some kids seemed so sophisticated and experienced, and others were still so young? Recently 11-year-old twins visited us, and I was astonished at how different they were in that way. Put it another way: once she gets to junior high, Dee will seem really young, but at the moment she rules the playground. It's all about context.


back to top

Tracy Talks

Tracy Chevalier
An occasional update from me about all things books- and writing-related, originally posted on my website www.tchevalier.com ...more
Follow Tracy Chevalier's blog with rss.