"Monte Cassino" Movie in the Making?!
The battle for Monte Cassino - one of the most bitterly fought land campaigns during World War II - is being made into a film to coincide with the battle's 70th anniversary.
The flick's British director John Irvin (who also did the impressive HBO war movie When Trumpets Fade) said that he didn't want to make a film that was "merely a bloodbath."
"It's a moving story of tenderness, love and hope with a sense of salvation within it," he told the BBC.
Irvin's previous films include 'Hamburger Hill' and 'The Dogs of War'.
Over several months in 1944, Monte Cassino was the focal point of a series of German defensive positions stretching across the Italian peninsula that prevented the Allied advance to Rome. During the harshest Italian winter on record, the mountainous terrain around the world-famous abbey provided the ideal protection for the German Army. The abbey was destroyed by aerial bombing in February 1944, but not before the German troops had rescued its treasures from destruction.
With nearly 200,000 soldiers participating from over 30 different countries, there were heavy losses on both sides. Some 55,000 Allied and 20,000 German soldiers were injured or killed.
Irvin said his fascination with Monte Cassino dated back to his school days, when he had been taught by a history master whose brother had died there.
"It's not a battle that the Allies can be very proud of," Irvin said. "The casualties were jaw-dropping, a third of which were inflicted by friendly fire. The aspect of the battle that has haunted me was the decision to carpet bomb the abbey, one of the great architectural jewels of western culture, which was reduced to rubble in six hours," he added.
The film tells the true story of two survivors of the battle, a wounded American soldier and the Italian nurse who cared for him. With casting underway, Irvin hopes to shoot Monte Cassino in Poland next year, and said the destruction of the abbey would involve a "significant amount of CGI." (Source: Yahoo News)
* * *
While he's a good director I feel inclined to ask this: Why in the seven hells do we need to turn a concept and an event that provided boatloads of drama, heroism and humanity on both sides and involved some of the fiercest fights in that theater of war into a bloody love story? What's so wrong about a story of a bunch of blokes from different backgrounds being in a war? The Longest Day did that. As did A Bridge Too Far. Even The Dirty Dozen managed that. Heck, even Saving Private Ryan - in and by itself truly not an example of great storytelling - was a genuine war movie.
This is a recipe for disappointment. I hope I'm wrong, though.
The flick's British director John Irvin (who also did the impressive HBO war movie When Trumpets Fade) said that he didn't want to make a film that was "merely a bloodbath."
"It's a moving story of tenderness, love and hope with a sense of salvation within it," he told the BBC.
Irvin's previous films include 'Hamburger Hill' and 'The Dogs of War'.
Over several months in 1944, Monte Cassino was the focal point of a series of German defensive positions stretching across the Italian peninsula that prevented the Allied advance to Rome. During the harshest Italian winter on record, the mountainous terrain around the world-famous abbey provided the ideal protection for the German Army. The abbey was destroyed by aerial bombing in February 1944, but not before the German troops had rescued its treasures from destruction.
With nearly 200,000 soldiers participating from over 30 different countries, there were heavy losses on both sides. Some 55,000 Allied and 20,000 German soldiers were injured or killed.
Irvin said his fascination with Monte Cassino dated back to his school days, when he had been taught by a history master whose brother had died there.
"It's not a battle that the Allies can be very proud of," Irvin said. "The casualties were jaw-dropping, a third of which were inflicted by friendly fire. The aspect of the battle that has haunted me was the decision to carpet bomb the abbey, one of the great architectural jewels of western culture, which was reduced to rubble in six hours," he added.
The film tells the true story of two survivors of the battle, a wounded American soldier and the Italian nurse who cared for him. With casting underway, Irvin hopes to shoot Monte Cassino in Poland next year, and said the destruction of the abbey would involve a "significant amount of CGI." (Source: Yahoo News)
* * *
While he's a good director I feel inclined to ask this: Why in the seven hells do we need to turn a concept and an event that provided boatloads of drama, heroism and humanity on both sides and involved some of the fiercest fights in that theater of war into a bloody love story? What's so wrong about a story of a bunch of blokes from different backgrounds being in a war? The Longest Day did that. As did A Bridge Too Far. Even The Dirty Dozen managed that. Heck, even Saving Private Ryan - in and by itself truly not an example of great storytelling - was a genuine war movie.
This is a recipe for disappointment. I hope I'm wrong, though.
No comments have been added yet.
