Be nice

I sat down at my computer tonight intending to write about general writing tips, but thought I'd breeze over to Twitter first, just in case I was missing out on ground-breaking news. Like, you know, Borders filing for bankruptcy. I could wax poetic on my feelings on that subject, but since I'm an author and a reader, I figure my stance is probably pretty obvious. But back to the subject at hand. Before starting this post, I swung by Twitter and discovered a link to a blog Lilith Saintcrow wrote in September 2006 on why the hard sell doesn't work. She gave several excellent tips on breaking into the publishing industry, and if that's your goal, I'd highly recommend reading the entire post. Here's a link. One part of her post in particular stood out to me, and I'm going to quote it here:


“Publishing is really a small business. You never know when the person you’re rude to on a convention panel or in an elevator at a trade show may hold the power of life or death over your wee manuscript in the future. It’s best to be tactful and interested in other people at cons and shows, not to mention writer’s group meetings.” --Lilith Saintcrow

 

Publishing is a small business. Simply put, everyone knows everyone. Instead of the “Six degrees of Kevin Bacon” we play the “Six degrees of Julie Strauss-Gabel.”

 

But back to writing tips. Since I turned SILENCE in to my editor last week, I've been playing catch-up with my email. One of the most popular questions I'm seeing is some form of this: “I'm an aspiring author and I was wondering if you could share tips on writing and breaking into the industry?”

 

This is a tough question to answer. I always feel like I need more information before I can give a solid answer. Often, I want to write back with a few questions of my own. Are you an aspiring author with a seed of an idea, or do you have a finished manuscript? Are you part of a critique group, and have the members given you feedback on your manuscript? Do you know what a query letter is? (It's fine if you don't, it just means my answer will be different.) Do you have an agent?

 

Regardless of the answers to these questions, I think there is one piece of advice that is universal, no matter where you find yourself on the path to publication. And that is: be nice. Be courteous. Be generous. As Lilith Saintcrow says, Be tactful. Be interested.

 

Be humble.

 

Let me tell you a story. In the weeks leading up to HUSH, HUSH's publication, I thought reading early reviews of the book would be helpful. Or maybe I didn't even think that. Maybe it all boiled down to simple curiosity. But whatever the reason, I frequently visited Goodreads and Amazon, determined to learn what people thought of my book. As you might expect, there were glowing reviews, mediocre reviews, and scathing reviews. One particular review that fell into the latter category caught my eye. I stewed over it for a few days, and eventually forgot about it.

 

Fast forward several months. An email arrived from an editor asking if I'd be interested in reading a manuscript. If you're two steps ahead, you might have already guessed that the author of the manuscript was none other than the author of the scathing review I had, up until this point, forgotten about. The editor introduced herself and made the comment that her author adored HUSH, HUSH and would love if I'd read her book with an eye toward writing a blurb. It was an awkward situation, to say the least. In the end, I did the only thing I felt appropriate: I laughed it off, then politely informed the editor I was swamped and unable to read the manuscript, but thanked her for thinking of me.

 

You might think I turned down reading the manuscript out of revenge or to give the author the finger, so to speak. I hope I'm not that petty. The reason I decided not to read the manuscript was because I wondered what would happen if I did read it...and loved it. What if I sent the editor a handful of glowing words, and she decided to stick them on the front cover of her author's book? Would the author love having my praise splashed on her cover? Probably not. In the end, I decided to take the higher road and let the author breathe easy. (It didn't slip my mind that the ultimate revenge would have been making sure my name got on the cover of her book. But again. Higher road. Always the better path.)

 

Interestingly enough, this once-aspiring author didn't limit her somewhat rantish reviews to HUSH, HUSH. She'd made quite a habit of belittling authors' books along the way, and I suppose it comes to no surprise that, as far as I know, she was never able to find an author to blurb her book. This isn't to say an aspiring author can't be honest when writing reviews, but if your goal is to be published, it might serve you well to drop the books you don't love, and talk up the ones you do. You don't have to love every book, every time. But I think a bit of courtesy in saying, “This wasn't for me, and here's why,” says volumes about you as a reviewer and a person. No one wants to start their career surrounded by nothing but a lot of burned bridges.

 

Whether you believe in karma, the Golden Rule, or the old saying, “What goes around comes around,” all have stood the test of time. If you want agents, editors and authors to respect you, take the first step. Extend kind words. Talk up books you love. Be polite and respectful at conferences. Attend author book signings. All of these things will go along way.

 

So, yes. That's my writing tip of the day. Be nice.

 

 

30 likes ·   •  230 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 17, 2011 03:10
Comments Showing 51-100 of 230 (230 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Ridley (new)

Ridley I haven't read Fitzpatrick at all, either. I'm here because I oppose any efforts to discourage honesty from reviewers and I support taking romance and romantic fiction seriously.

If you want your book and your work treated as a legitimate work of fiction, you need to be able to accept negative reactions to your work from readers and other authors. If you can't separate yourself from your book and conflate criticism of your work with criticism of your person, you won't make it very long in the business. You'll either drop dead of a stress-induced heart attack or go out in a blaze of Deborah MacGillivray-like misconduct.

Serious authors ignore scathing reviews. Petty ones retaliate.


message 52: by Elle (new)

Elle Lucy wrote: "Correct me if I'm wrong but neither Lindsey-with-an-i nor Ann have actually read Hush, Hush or anything else Fitzpatrick wrote so you guys have no idea why most of us think it's a book worthy of ne..."



As a matter of fact Ann got both Fitzpatrick books for her daughter. One detail that maybe you will be surprise is that her daughter didn't like the story.


message 53: by Lore (new)

Lore Voicing your opinions about a product, whether they are good or bad, should NEVER define you as a kind or unkind person. And no one should ever have to feel threatened against stating their opinion. Whatever their opinion might be.

This is all most of us are trying to say Lindsey. We merely are offended that because our ideas about the book are not exactly as the author would have them be - ergo, our opinion should be silenced? We are NOT condoning brutal personal attacks on the author. Not in any form. We only think that this is a form of censorship and a threat on a part of the author.

You may not think that she meant it in a threatening manner and that's perfectly fine. We are just saying that is how we took it.


message 54: by Ceilidh (new)

Ceilidh I'm wondering how Ms Fitzpatrick feels about sites like Amazon admitting they sometimes don't allow negative reviews to be posted to their site if the other reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Is that being nice, good karma or just straight up censorship and lying?


message 55: by [deleted user] (new)

Ceilidh wrote: "I'm wondering how Ms Fitzpatrick feels about sites like Amazon admitting they sometimes don't allow negative reviews to be posted to their site if the other reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Is ..."


Regrettably, it's business. They want money no matter what, even if it means lying, which is unfortunate. I work at a book store that discourages us from telling customers how we really feel about books if they ask us for our opinions which is why i'm here on goodreads.


message 56: by Lucy (last edited Feb 28, 2011 09:32AM) (new)

Lucy Ridley, I don't think you need to have read the books to know a threat like that when you see it, but I think Lindsey calling all the reviews unfair and 'bullying' warranted recommending she read the book and then try to check out the reviews with an objective eye. I definitely don't recommend anyone buy either Hush, Hush or Crescendo from the content and writing style alone.

Edit: Hey Michelle, it is interesting to know, but I really want to know what she'd think of the reviews post reading the book, whether they were informative and good to have or if it was all just unnecessary negativity.


message 57: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Whatever it is, I'm fairly sure it's illegal! So I hope someone over there is making a stink about this! "We don't allow negative reviews because it could be the competition trying to push our sales down" is hands-down the lamest excuse for censorship I have ever heard. Really, Amazon? That's the best you could come up with?


message 58: by Cory (new)

Cory Talk about cowardly. Why'd you delete your posts Lindsey if you were right? It makes us look like we're talking to ourselves.


message 59: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Oh by the way, you guys should totally read the next post on this blog, Suck It Up, where Fitzpatrick admits that she doesn't handle her editorial letters well.

The letter comes directly from the editor and its purpose is to give the author a blueprint for revisions. But the day I receive the letter, that's not what I see. I see page after page detailing every last thing that is wrong with my novel. The letter screams, YOUR NOVEL SUCKS!

This is the person we are expecting to handle negative criticism with maturity?


message 60: by Dinjolina (new)

Dinjolina Lindsey wrote: "So, answer me this. If your child was surrounded by a group of kids on a playground because she/he wasn’t wearing the new ‘cool’ shoes and being mocked relentlessly for it, would that piss you off? Or would you just tell this newly developing child to ‘suck it up, we all need some negative in our lives to get to the positive’?
I think not! "


I had to get back tot his....I'm sorry,but WHAT?????
Talk about mixing cats and dogs...
Did my kid get paid for wearing old shoes?
If he did,and he has big bucks coming in,then yeah-suck it up if people do not like it!


message 61: by Lucy (new)

Lucy *sighs* I hate when people delete their posts. If she was going to say all of that she should have stood by it. It makes me feel like we were talking to someone's sockpuppet.


message 62: by Cory (new)

Cory I'd agree Hellion, but this is Fitzpatrick. She got a whole lot of money for these books. And we see what editing did for them.

Still, editing is an intensive process. I can see how you'd feel bad if your editor is harsh. And re-writing page upon page is tough. But I like harsh critique on my writing. I'm weird like that.

Are you writing a book Hellion?


message 63: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Hellion, I guess you DO have a point, except, you know, I'm having to re-write my ENTIRE MANUSCRIPT because my editor is making me. But I never looked at it and said, OH my God, I've written the worst novel ever and I want to weep and wail about it. Mostly, I'm just like, Thank you, Jesus for not making me run around for years to get my novel published, and console myself with the fact that if I hadn't been good enough, I wouldn't have an editorial letter at all! WHat I'm trying to say is, it's all about perspective, and how you deal with the little things also shows how you'll deal with the big ones.


message 64: by Cory (new)

Cory Ooh, she de-friended me. I'm hurt.


Not really.


message 65: by Dinjolina (last edited Feb 28, 2011 09:50AM) (new)

Dinjolina Cory wrote: "Ooh, she de-friended me. I'm hurt.


Not really."


Huh?
:/
She did?
Are we,like,back in middle school? :/


message 66: by Cory (new)

Cory Good luck with your book. It's funny how pretty much all of us are writers. You think the published authors could be a bit sympathetic with our cause.


message 67: by Cory (last edited Feb 28, 2011 09:52AM) (new)

Cory I think we are Dinjolina. The YA Clique is giving us the freeze out.


message 68: by Marta (new)

Marta Acosta Yikes, I think Becca's very nice suggestion is being misinterpreted.

Thoughtful reviews -- even negative thoughtful reviews are useful to both readers and writers. As a writer, you take serious criticisms into consideration. I know I've thought, "Yep, she's got a good point."

But reviews are for readers, not writers. A good reviewer helps her readers decide whether or not to invest time and money in a book. A good reviewer helps you sort out the gems from the dross.

Now by a "scathing review" I'm guessing that Becca meant a rant. Those can be fun to write and fun to read. Frankly, I love a good rant. I totally love an out of control rant. I adore a train-wreck of a rant. Reviewers should rant when they want to rant.

However, if you rant about how my writing is stoopid and that my mother dresses me funny, then perhaps you shouldn't ask me for a blurb. I will wonder at the dissonance there. I mean, if you hate my writing and my mother's impeccable taste in selecting my chic velour and BeDazzlered warmups, why do you trust my opinion? It falls into a "does not compute, Will Robinson" category and makes my brain circuits fry.

"Be nice" is professional advice to an aspiring author, not to reviewers. "Be nice" means that you are grateful for readers and that you understand how lucky you are to write. "Be nice" means that you treat others with respect. Again, this advice is for authors and aspiring authors, not reviewers.

I would say to reviewers, be thoughtful. If you hate something explain why. If you love something, explain why. In conclusion, stay klassy, San Diego!


message 69: by Kogiopsis (last edited Feb 28, 2011 10:06AM) (new)

Kogiopsis Wow, this grew prodigiously.
I'm kind of annoyed that Lindsey deleted her posts, because there are holes in the conversation, but I suppose that's her right as a contributor... namely, to decide that her contribution isn't actually worth offering. Whatever.

Edit: Marta, thank you for acknowledging that readers are the indended audience of reviews. However, as people have pointed out in this comment thread and elsewhere it's not clear if it was, in fact, the author who asked for a blurb.
Your second-to-last paragraph has a line of advice which I don't think Fitzpatrick was communicating (or at least if she was, she was doing it poorly) but which I do think she should take: "Be nice" means that you are grateful for readers and that you understand how lucky you are to write. She's not being grateful for her readers, at least not the ones who disliked her book but who spent money and/or took time to read it anyway and respond. And as for respect, well, it goes both ways. If I was even the slightest bit inclined to read another of Fitzpatrick's projects after she finishes the Hush, Hush series (and for the record, I'm not, but this is hypothetical) I would lose that inclination based on this post, because she is not treating reviewers with respect. There is an element of implicit threat here, as I believe Lucy already said, and that convinces me wholly that her books are simply not worth my time.


message 70: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Marta: a) This is Becca's advice to aspiring authors who are reviewers. Everyone on this thread who is also an aspiring author, raise your hands! I think you'll find about 95% of the people here with their hands up. That means she is telling more or less ALL of us here to "be Nice". Not in person, but in our reviews.


message 71: by Dinjolina (new)

Dinjolina This whole... 'your rew will bite your ass' deal is freaking me out.Why would I like a hostile author?
It makes it look like she is above the readers.
I'm published in my country and...I've been in the process.
I stood on book fairs and people read my summaries and..well some snorted.Nice,huh? :)
It was not.They just didn't like the genre I write in.Or me.Or my hair.
So nobody could tell me it does not hurt sometimes.
But please!Be a man(woman) and live it down!
You can not go around kicking people in the shins or invoking God's anger on them if they do not like your work.
Yeah,sometimes the negative rew has no point.
It goes something like this-i do not like fallen angels.
Well,why did you read it?
I read it to trash it!
This I can not stand.
But when people write genuine arguments you just have to sit down and think.
OMG!Maybe they are right!
So Hush Hush is a series.The 2 books were...erm...not so good.Stop going around with a torch and stop the yelling about burning down the negative rewires careers.Just change!Small changes cane make the world of difference sometimes.


Why is this so difficult to understand?


message 72: by Lucy (new)

Lucy Wait, who de-friended you Cory?


message 73: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya b) However, if you rant about how my writing is stoopid and that my mother dresses me funny, then perhaps you shouldn't ask me for a blurb.

I wouldn't. In fact BF herself speculates that in all probability, the editor was approaching her for a blurb without the author's knowledge. But to tell you the truth, the whole story sounds a little made-up and implausible to me. Someone called it a wish-fulfillment anecdote or something on another thread, and I think that's what this is. The whole thing with all the other authors banding together and refusing to blurb her book sounds very far-fetched. This is the problem with "this one author" type stories. You could be talking about anyone, or no-one at all.


message 74: by Dinjolina (new)

Dinjolina And rew are for the author also.
I'm sorry,bu they just are.
It is your peer judgement.


message 75: by Vinaya (last edited Feb 28, 2011 10:20AM) (new)

Vinaya c) Now by a "scathing review" I'm guessing that Becca meant a rant.

Let me tell you a story about a GR friend of mine. This is a story that almost everyone else on this thread knows and can back me up on, so you know I'm not making this up. SO my friend wrote a beautifully detailed review of Shiver, questioning several aspects of the book and its ideologies. You know how the author responded? By telling her that if she wasn't nice, she wouldn't get published. Is it only I who think its weird that all these YA authors are telling reviewers how to write their reviews? AM I the only one to whom "Be humble" reads as "Lick my ass"?


message 76: by Cory (last edited Feb 28, 2011 10:19AM) (new)

Cory Lindsey Kirk. I think I had her friended, and then suddenly, her profile is private.

The story sounds pretty funny to me too Vinaya. I'm wondering who the author in question is. Still no response from Fitzpatrick on that. And no link to the mean review.


message 77: by Dinjolina (new)

Dinjolina It's kind of frightful.
I imagine the authors waiting for the new ones with baseball bats when they go to the publisher. :)


message 78: by Cory (new)

Cory And Ceilidh's review was pretty awesome. It should be law to read her review on Shiver and Hush, Hush.


message 79: by Char (new)

Char Hush Hush is on my To Read list but this post makes me think I don't want to read it, because I can be critical in reviews, not because I'm malicious but because I'm opinionated and I want to share my opinions with the lovely people on Goodreads.

If someone who's published can't take the good with the bad then maybe they shouldn't be writing. I'll take any sort of opinion I can get on my writing. It means that it's actually caused someone to think about it... even if it is in a negative way.


message 80: by Lucy (new)

Lucy Vinaya, you are definitely not the only one who saw all the subtext of 'be nice.' When you complain about the people reviewing your work with depth and critical eyes you should be aware we're going to grasp the nuances of what you're saying.

And I actually found Ceilidh's Sparkle Blog and her review there through a comment Maureen Johnson made on the Bitch Magazine 100 YA novels for young feminists. She said something about calling them a clique so I started searching YA clique and the comments Maggie S. left on the blog popped right up. I was pretty horrified at the time. It's funny she did it on a blog and not on the goodreads review.


message 81: by Dinjolina (new)

Dinjolina Actually,non of this is funny.
More like...sad.


message 82: by Marta (new)

Marta Acosta You know, a contentious discussion is a great way to wake up!
-Anila, blurbing makes me crazy. Sometimes editors ask for blurbs without telling the author, but sometimes they confer first. As to the other point, I think it's really really hard not to react to negative criticism when you've worked so hard on your book. There's a reason I don't want to know anything personal about writers. I'm pretty sure a lot of my faves are total douchebags in person...but they write brilliantly. I'm buying the book, not a friendship. (If I could buy a friendship it would be with Tim Gunn, but that's another story.)
-Vinaya, thanks for the clarification. I really sensed that this site is for passionate readers, so I generally let them be. I wasn't aware that many of you are also writers. That changes the dynamics. Although I'm guessing that every YA editor is asking the same YA bestsellers for blurbs.
-Dinjolina, you mean I have a Louiesville Slugger for nothing?


message 83: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Marta, can I just say that's it's great to meet someone who doesn't take a rebuttal as a sign of opening hostilities? :)


message 84: by Marta (new)

Marta Acosta Hey, I save all my venom for my family and friends! Because, you know what they say, you've got a limited amount of spite in life, so don't waste it on those you don't truly care about.


message 85: by Shannon (new)

Shannon Cory wrote: "Talk about cowardly. Why'd you delete your posts Lindsey if you were right? It makes us look like we're talking to ourselves."

Lol. She also unfriended me and deleted all of her comments on a review of mine. I'm pretty sure she was referencing me about how she can't understand why someone would read and review a book to rip it apart.

If I read a book I bought and I hate it, I will be brutally honest about why I did. I won't personally attack an author, threaten her family, or fire bomb her house. I will critically examine the book, give my reasons for hating it as concisely as possible, while also giving as many examples of anything I may have found redeeming in the work. I'm not going to drop every book that I deem less than 3 stars. That's just ludicrous. I hardly ever give any books 4 or 5 stars even, they have to be really really special for me to feel they deserve that.

And you know what? They're my reviews. I paid for the books, I can say what I want. I can rate them anyway I want. And then hopefully steer my like-minded friends toward purchasing, or not purchasing, the book I just read. That's the whole point! It's not about karma, it's not about stroking the author's ego, it's not about making an author upset - it's about sharing your views and opinions with people who are interested in the same books as you.


message 86: by Mel (new)

Mel -raises hand- Aspiring author here.

Write negative reviews politely and respectfully? Okay. However, when it comes to a book that glorifies abusive relationships, SEXUAL ABUSE, stalking, presenting teenage angst as being true love, and rotten behaviour as being romantic, then no one is going to give that book a respectful review for obvious reasons. That's why books like Hush, hush, Twilight, Fallen and others get such 'scathing reviews'. Because readers who notice these issues actually have a serious problem with these books. And anyone defending this blog, read the book, and then wonder why we who didn't like it are so critical of it. If it was just bad writing and bad plot structure and bad characters, then it wouldn't have received even half as much hate. It would have just been 'Yeah, it wasn't that good.' But when it also has the things mentioned above, people will undoubtedly go 'What the fuck is this bullshit???'

And even the reviews that are written so respectfully and even weigh out cons against the pros get shot down by either the author or by their fans. As it was mentioned before, a user on Goodreads got flamed by the author of the very book she was reviewing. Another user, who wrote a polite critical review, and who writes nothing but polite critical reviews, got flamed by someone close to the author. Unfortunately the comments are now gone because said person close to the author has deleted them all.

And negative reviews should be done carefully? And I suppose good reviews are out of the question. You can write a good review, praising the book with nothing to back up your argument to the point where you look like a love-sick obsessed little weirdo, but you have to be walking around eggshells when writing critical reviews.

Nobody writes negative reviews to belittle a book or an author. People write negative reviews to express to other readers what bothered them about the book and why they didn't like it. Just like people write positive reviews to express what they did like about the book. And there's no need to cry about negative reviews. Have you ever heard of constructive criticism, Fitzpatrick? Negative reviews can help you out so much more than positive reviews, because with negative reviews you come face to face with mistakes you've made and even solutions on how to fix them and grow as an author. It's a bitch to see a bad review on something you worked hard on, but SUCK IT UP. Use it to grow and get better. Of course that wont happen if you dismiss it altogether.


message 87: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis Mel, after reading that I find myself wildly searching for a like button. Instead, have some e-applause.

Well put indeed.


Marta: I understand wanting to react to criticism but, as Ilona Andrews pointed out in a blog post someone else linked already, authors don't get to be people first- they have to also be business entities and lashing out (even subtly) or criticizing criticism itself is unprofessional.
Anyhow, I totally agree with you that blurbing is frustrating. And thank you for your wonderful rational contributins to the discussion. :D


message 88: by Marta (new)

Marta Acosta Hi, Anila, hey, thanks for calling me rational! That's a first. I agree that authors shouldn't react negatively to criticism publicly. Privately one may rage, but even that's a waste of time and your friends get really bored with hearing how you're not appreciated.

This exchange started because Becca was asked for a blurb by someone who had trashed her book. Again, what was the thinking there by the author and editor?

-Mel, thanks for clarifying. I was responding to the request for a blurb from someone who clearly didn't admire her work. That may have been the editor acting on her own, because sometimes they do.

This has been a most interesting diversion.


message 89: by Joyzi (new)

Joyzi I think that the scenario was a little bit confusing...or maybe that was just me.

So Ms. Fitzpatrick read early reviews about her book and she frequently visited Goodreads and Amazon. And then she classify the reviews as:

1. Glowing review
2. Mediocre review
3. Scathing review

So she read this scathing review of a reviewer maybe in Goodreads or in Amazon. But what is scathing? How did she considered the review scathing? The term was really vague, it could have been a negative review that has valid points or maybe just a negative review saying all evil towards the author without posting any points on why the book was not good.


message 90: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis It doesn't make sense that an author would ask for a blurb from someone they didn't like- that part of the story is pretty confusing.
LOL; I have trouble believing that's the first time anyone's called you rational. You manage to bring up some good points without being insanely defensive of Fitzpatrick's post; I don't have to agree with everything you say to agree with that.


message 91: by Mel (last edited Feb 28, 2011 08:29PM) (new)

Mel @Marta: Oh, I was actually responding to the author's comments on writing 'respectful negative reviews', not yours.


message 92: by Joyzi (last edited Feb 28, 2011 08:51PM) (new)

Joyzi Anila wrote: "It doesn't make sense that an author would ask for a blurb from someone they didn't like- that part of the story is pretty confusing.
LOL; I have trouble believing that's the first time anyone's c..."


yeah that's also confusing and Ms. Fitzpatrick says that

"Interestingly enough, this once-aspiring author didn't limit her somewhat rantish reviews to HUSH, HUSH. She'd made quite a habit of belittling authors' books along the way, and I suppose it comes to no surprise that, as far as I know, she was never able to find an author to blurb her book."

It was also confusing...uhhhm so this aspiring author also have negative reviews on other authors and she also go to these authors to blurb her book. Confusing story... I might say I need to read her reviews first, maybe she rants about these books because she found something disturbing about them, idk maybe these are YA books? I read a lot of rants and reviews about how disturbing some of the YA books nowadays.


message 93: by Lucy (new)

Lucy I've been digging through the reviews to see if anyone got upgraded to author status on goodreads after reviewing Becca's books and I can't find any. Ceilidh found an established author's review and that's all I'm getting. I'm going to try amazon later tonight.


message 94: by Cory (new)

Cory Lucy wrote: "I've been digging through the reviews to see if anyone got upgraded to author status on goodreads after reviewing Becca's books and I can't find any. Ceilidh found an established author's review an..."

Who knows, maybe that author removed their review. Too bad their wasn't any big scandal surrounding it. Or maybe Fitzpatrick made the whole thing up. You'd think there would be a huge story surrounding a debut author that pissed so many people off they couldn't get a blurb done.


message 95: by Ridley (new)

Ridley If it is indeed true, I think it speaks more to author pettiness than any particular misdeed by the author-reviewer.


message 96: by Joyzi (new)

Joyzi Yeah and if you read the 1 star reviews on goodreads, I can't really say they are that scathing


message 97: by Joyzi (new)

Joyzi http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...

I really like this particular review.

Uhhhm I still have that really weird feeling of wanting to rip my hair out whenever I saw my 4 star glowing review of Hush Hush. Can't believe I fall for it.


message 98: by Lucy (new)

Lucy Do you guys think she's aware of the outrage her review unleashed in all of us? Maybe she's tactfully ignoring all of the fallout. If she is it's the smartest and most professional thing she could do after that post. Even taking it down would be an acknowledgement it was a mistake


message 99: by Lore (last edited Mar 01, 2011 08:10AM) (new)

Lore Cory wrote: Who knows, maybe that author removed their review. Too bad their wasn't any big scandal surrounding it. Or maybe Fitzpatrick made the whole thing up. You'd think there would be a huge story surrounding a debut author that pissed so many people off they couldn't get a blurb done.

I was thinking that if the author/reviewer spoke out against the book so "strongly" the first time, you'd think she would have something to say here, if she existed on Goodreads at all.


message 100: by Petra X (last edited Mar 01, 2011 09:17AM) (new)

Petra X Becca Fitzpatrick wrote: "Interestingly enough, this once-aspiring author didn't limit her somewhat rantish reviews to HUSH, HUSH. She'd made quite a habit of belittling authors' books along the way, and I suppose it comes to no surprise that, as far as I know, she was never able to find an author to blurb her book"

You don't think that's petty? I think it is, very.

Its always good advice to be nice to people, but that shouldn't extend as far as 'drop the books you don't love' i.e. not writing negative reviews in case you piss off authors (like you) who will exact some petty revenge by refusing to write a blurb and then blogging about them (leaving it to others to look up the 1-star reviews by GR authors).

I do enjoy a good, scathing review sometimes but I never enjoy authors trying to silence those who write them.


back to top