Be nice

I sat down at my computer tonight intending to write about general writing tips, but thought I'd breeze over to Twitter first, just in case I was missing out on ground-breaking news. Like, you know, Borders filing for bankruptcy. I could wax poetic on my feelings on that subject, but since I'm an author and a reader, I figure my stance is probably pretty obvious. But back to the subject at hand. Before starting this post, I swung by Twitter and discovered a link to a blog Lilith Saintcrow wrote in September 2006 on why the hard sell doesn't work. She gave several excellent tips on breaking into the publishing industry, and if that's your goal, I'd highly recommend reading the entire post. Here's a link. One part of her post in particular stood out to me, and I'm going to quote it here:


“Publishing is really a small business. You never know when the person you’re rude to on a convention panel or in an elevator at a trade show may hold the power of life or death over your wee manuscript in the future. It’s best to be tactful and interested in other people at cons and shows, not to mention writer’s group meetings.” --Lilith Saintcrow

 

Publishing is a small business. Simply put, everyone knows everyone. Instead of the “Six degrees of Kevin Bacon” we play the “Six degrees of Julie Strauss-Gabel.”

 

But back to writing tips. Since I turned SILENCE in to my editor last week, I've been playing catch-up with my email. One of the most popular questions I'm seeing is some form of this: “I'm an aspiring author and I was wondering if you could share tips on writing and breaking into the industry?”

 

This is a tough question to answer. I always feel like I need more information before I can give a solid answer. Often, I want to write back with a few questions of my own. Are you an aspiring author with a seed of an idea, or do you have a finished manuscript? Are you part of a critique group, and have the members given you feedback on your manuscript? Do you know what a query letter is? (It's fine if you don't, it just means my answer will be different.) Do you have an agent?

 

Regardless of the answers to these questions, I think there is one piece of advice that is universal, no matter where you find yourself on the path to publication. And that is: be nice. Be courteous. Be generous. As Lilith Saintcrow says, Be tactful. Be interested.

 

Be humble.

 

Let me tell you a story. In the weeks leading up to HUSH, HUSH's publication, I thought reading early reviews of the book would be helpful. Or maybe I didn't even think that. Maybe it all boiled down to simple curiosity. But whatever the reason, I frequently visited Goodreads and Amazon, determined to learn what people thought of my book. As you might expect, there were glowing reviews, mediocre reviews, and scathing reviews. One particular review that fell into the latter category caught my eye. I stewed over it for a few days, and eventually forgot about it.

 

Fast forward several months. An email arrived from an editor asking if I'd be interested in reading a manuscript. If you're two steps ahead, you might have already guessed that the author of the manuscript was none other than the author of the scathing review I had, up until this point, forgotten about. The editor introduced herself and made the comment that her author adored HUSH, HUSH and would love if I'd read her book with an eye toward writing a blurb. It was an awkward situation, to say the least. In the end, I did the only thing I felt appropriate: I laughed it off, then politely informed the editor I was swamped and unable to read the manuscript, but thanked her for thinking of me.

 

You might think I turned down reading the manuscript out of revenge or to give the author the finger, so to speak. I hope I'm not that petty. The reason I decided not to read the manuscript was because I wondered what would happen if I did read it...and loved it. What if I sent the editor a handful of glowing words, and she decided to stick them on the front cover of her author's book? Would the author love having my praise splashed on her cover? Probably not. In the end, I decided to take the higher road and let the author breathe easy. (It didn't slip my mind that the ultimate revenge would have been making sure my name got on the cover of her book. But again. Higher road. Always the better path.)

 

Interestingly enough, this once-aspiring author didn't limit her somewhat rantish reviews to HUSH, HUSH. She'd made quite a habit of belittling authors' books along the way, and I suppose it comes to no surprise that, as far as I know, she was never able to find an author to blurb her book. This isn't to say an aspiring author can't be honest when writing reviews, but if your goal is to be published, it might serve you well to drop the books you don't love, and talk up the ones you do. You don't have to love every book, every time. But I think a bit of courtesy in saying, “This wasn't for me, and here's why,” says volumes about you as a reviewer and a person. No one wants to start their career surrounded by nothing but a lot of burned bridges.

 

Whether you believe in karma, the Golden Rule, or the old saying, “What goes around comes around,” all have stood the test of time. If you want agents, editors and authors to respect you, take the first step. Extend kind words. Talk up books you love. Be polite and respectful at conferences. Attend author book signings. All of these things will go along way.

 

So, yes. That's my writing tip of the day. Be nice.

 

 

30 likes ·   •  230 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 17, 2011 03:10
Comments Showing 201-230 of 230 (230 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 201: by Lucy (new)

Lucy Melissa wrote: "Yeah, Lucy, Divers is my alter ego. Right. You should ask GR to check the IP addresses."

Aww, did you really drive down to your local Starbucks to post under that account a few times? Well, that explains why you weren't doing 50 of them at the same time for a change of pace. I'm sure your lazy efforts to trick the system will fool everyone this time!


message 202: by [deleted user] (last edited Jan 13, 2012 07:58PM) (new)

Divers wrote: "Melissa wrote: "Lucy wrote: "Of course, Mel is the dominant personality in the many faces of eve"

Yeah, Lucy, Divers is my alter ego. Right. You should ask GR to check the IP addresses."

it's a..."


I think you need to shut the fuck up, learn how to capitalize properly, and stop being a misogynistic douchebag.


message 203: by [deleted user] (new)

Divers wrote: "Midnight_Kiss wrote: "Divers wrote: "Melissa wrote: "Lucy wrote: "Of course, Mel is the dominant personality in the many faces of eve"

Yeah, Lucy, Divers is my alter ego. Right. You should ask G..."


Do I give a damn, especially when I see you attacking someone like that? Answer: hell no.


message 204: by Rhiannon (new)

Rhiannon "Critical reviews are not negative reviews.

Know this distinction. Critical reviews involve thoughtful analysis and synthesis of the work at hand. They support their statements -- both positive and negative -- with what's in front of them. They check their baggage at the door.

Negative reviews are not supported by text. Negative reviews don't tell readers anything substantial about the book, but rather, about the reviewer. It's self reflective, rather than text reflective."
http://www.stackedbooks.org/2012/01/o...


message 205: by Kogiopsis (last edited Jan 13, 2012 10:39PM) (new)

Kogiopsis Yes, Melissa, I'm aware of the unsubscribe button - but why would I use it in the middle of a fight? My friends are being attacked and called some pretty horrible things; I'm going to be here for them. (Called those things, by the way, by your friends. You would do us all a favor if you asked Divers to stop; maybe then the debate could be at least a bit more civilized.) And when the fights fade, I forget about it.

As far as why I would read something that I knew was going to annoy me - when someone comments on this, I never do know. And if it does make me angry, well, know thine enemy, right?

I was the one who pointed you to this thread, because I thought you could learn something by reading the comments here - I was wrong, and I've long since dealt with that.

Fitzpatrick isn't getting slammed for being honest. She's getting slammed for the implied threat against negative reviewers. She's getting slammed for couching her plea for people to 'be nice' in a story about a former reviewer who, like some little girl in a cautionary fairy tale, couldn't get anyone to blurb her book because she had been soooo meaaaaan. If that's the case with the publishing industry today, so be it. I personally do not care all that much, though I do wish it were more of a meritocracy. What I care is that an author brings this up in a context where it sounds like 'be nice or no one will publish you'. Which in this case is also 'do not voice your honest opinion or no one will publish you'.
If this had been a blog post about how the publishing industry (like any other industry) is as much about who you know as it is how good you are, fine. That's what Lilith Saintcrow's post was about and it's good advice. However, because Fitzpatrick expressed it by telling a story about someone whose career had trouble because, among other things, she wrote a harsh review of Hush, Hush, it feels vindictive and it feels like a warning.
There's nothing wrong with choosing to review 'nicely' so as not to step on any toes. There isn't. That's a personal decision that each reviewer must make. There's also nothing wrong with reviewing as harshly and honestly as possible. (People keep saying that there are reviews that cross the line into making fun of the author and disrespecting their personal lives. I for one have never seen them, but if they exist that's a different story.) A book is a product put out for consumption, and an author like any other producer must expect feedback of all forms from the consumers who buy their book.


Anyhow, I hope that made sense. Having read some of the hideous vitriol that exploded around the new year, I now look back on this post as rather gentle, all things considered. It's not, however, too much to say that there is a fight between some authors and negative reviewers, and if you disagree then I advise you to read this summary. Pay particular attention to number three, wherein the full text of an e-mail from an author about a reviewer is found. If you have any sense of common decency, and I maintain hope that you do, you will be horrified.

(It's not a religious crusade, by the way. It's a crusade for free speech - not so much securing the right, but trying to deal with people who don't think we have it already.)




Oh, and one more thing. I'm really tired of seeing people who disagree with Fitzpatrick treated as if they must only trash books, have no lives, and get zero joy out of anything other than trying to ruin some poor author's career. These people are not demons. I see all of their updates and I assure you that they, like all readers, would much rather read a good book and love it than read a bad one and hate it. That's why they're on Goodreads. Just saying.


message 206: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis Rhiannon wrote: ""Critical reviews are not negative reviews.

Know this distinction. Critical reviews involve thoughtful analysis and synthesis of the work at hand. They support their statements -- both positive an..."


And by that definition, I have yet to see a single 'negative' review on Goodreads.
Thank you, Rhiannon. That helps.


message 207: by Penny (new)

Penny Is it just me or are publishing companies going the way of the dinosaur, or at the very least becoming more obsolete? I mean, self published ebooks such as Angelfall are proof of that, right? The author is getting free word of mouth on places like goodreads.
So basically this whole 'be nice' speech is moot. Blurbs from other authors won't be necessary in the future. So long as your ebook is good enough and well edited, you could be the next Susan Ee. Girlfriend doesn't have to deal with publishers or blurbs from other authors. Just saying.


message 208: by Cory (new)

Cory Just wrote: "i think stupid bitch should be her official name. what do you think?

LMFAO!"


Why is this funny? It's not, you know.


message 209: by [deleted user] (new)

Cory wrote: "Just wrote: "i think stupid bitch should be her official name. what do you think?

LMFAO!"

Why is this funny? It's not, you know."


I guess we are back in middle school now where saying naughty words is hilarious. Teehee.


message 210: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Ge I'm too lazy to read all of the comments, so forgive me if someone has mentioned this already, but I think it is possible to write a negative review without being a total jerk. I mean, consider the following [hastily made up] sentences:

1. I did not enjoy this book because I thought the characters were flat.
2. I am putting this into my never-ever-ever-ever-read folder because the characters sucked.

The intention behind these two reviews might be the same, but the way they are worded can lead to completely different situations. I don't think it's wrong to write a negative review, but there's no need to insult something to prove your point. It's not like the author purposely wrote a book you didn't like to get on your nerves. Read: it's not a personal issue!

That being said, this is not to say that I'm taking the authors' side, as I have seen some pretty rude comments from various authors over mean reviews. Authors should be able to graciously accept negative feedback, or just overlook it completely if it really bothers them.

I'm not even sure I really get the point of this huge battle between reviewers and authors...and I can't even remember where I was trying to go with this.

Erm.

(?)


message 211: by [deleted user] (new)

Just wrote: "Midnight_Kiss wrote: "Cory wrote: "Just wrote: "i think stupid bitch should be her official name. what do you think?

LMFAO!"

Why is this funny? It's not, you know."

I guess we are back in middle..."


Real mature.


message 212: by Kat Kennedy (last edited Jan 14, 2012 07:12PM) (new)

Kat Kennedy With friends like these, who needs to publicly embarrass themselves.

This thread has gotten so far out of hand that it's become ridiculous.


message 213: by Kaitlyn (new)

Kaitlyn Sorry honey, while I don't think any one should be abusive towards you, there's such a thing as constructive criticism and BOOOOOY howdy, do you need some. Hush Hush needed a few more good, hard edits before being published. Next time, try to take the criticism like a big girl.


message 214: by Kat Kennedy (new)

Kat Kennedy [image error]


message 215: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis Divers wrote: "wow, good comeback.

no, i am not new here. i've seen enough of your bullshit to know that all these authors you write about on your blog, who are "persecuting" your friends, what that's called is..."


Do you honestly think that any reviewer behavior is actually justification for an author to call them a stupid cow?
No, wait, bad question. Of course you do. You have no sense of common decency. I keep forgetting.


message 216: by Kat Kennedy (new)

Kat Kennedy Haha! Come on Anila, Let's go have a lot of vile, cursing and awesome mudslinging together. Sounds like a lot of fun, actually. Dirty, dirty, fun!


message 217: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis Divers wrote: "Anila wrote: "Divers wrote: "wow, good comeback.

no, i am not new here. i've seen enough of your bullshit to know that all these authors you write about on your blog, who are "persecuting" your f..."


Citation needed, jackass. Except for that one; you can have it for free.


message 218: by [deleted user] (new)

Divers wrote: "Anila wrote: "Divers wrote: "wow, good comeback.

no, i am not new here. i've seen enough of your bullshit to know that all these authors you write about on your blog, who are "persecuting" your f..."


lol, you've been doing the same thing, you're not any better.


message 219: by Kogiopsis (new)

Kogiopsis No, I think when you make accusations, you should make founded ones. Or you could just be making shit up, to be perfectly honest; it wouldn't surprise me.
Let me put it this way: if you actually have a complaint with anyone's behavior and would like to see them change, point it out to them with examples, since you keep claiming to have many, and I bet they'll listen. If, on the other hand, your entire purpose here is to be an asshole for giggles, carry on the way you're going because it seems to be working.


message 220: by Marie (last edited Jan 15, 2012 11:49PM) (new)

Marie This whole post needs to be deleted.

The above is nothing more than assault. I can't more people aren't objecting to the kind of behavior exhibited by members Divers and Just.


message 221: by Kaia (new)

Kaia I can't believe GoodReads is just letting this continue. Hasn't anyone flagged these bozos?


message 222: by Marie (new)

Marie I've tried, while making it as clear as I can quoting their own guidelines at them, it's not about the words used, it's about the using the language to assault the other members. I just can't get over it (nor do I think I should, I just wish the author's had come back to condemn them as well, no matter how much they might disagree with the others' philosophy.)


message 223: by Pack-it-up (new)

Pack-it-up Vi wrote: "Uh, no Fitzpatrick. Sit yourself down. ALL the way down.

This is a thinly veiled scare tactic and sorry, NOBODY is having it. If I think your work sucks, I will say it, and I will say it proudly -..."


Love it!


message 224: by Pack-it-up (new)

Pack-it-up Ridley wrote: "I haven't read Fitzpatrick at all, either. I'm here because I oppose any efforts to discourage honesty from reviewers and I support taking romance and romantic fiction seriously.

If you want your ..."


Hear hear! Romance and romantic fiction should be taken seriously! *ahem* Sorry, go on..


message 225: by Marta (new)

Marta Acosta Kat wrote: ""

Thank you for the lovely Gene Wilder photo! Now I've got "Pure Imagination" running through my head.


message 226: by Kiki (last edited Jan 28, 2012 06:47PM) (new)

Kiki Ladies, don't feed the trolls! Both Just and Diver have private accounts and 4.50+ average ratings with less than five reviews each. They also don't know how to insert capital letters into their typing vocabulary.

I smell sock puppets.


message 227: by Megan (new)

Megan I think what should be taken away from this is the power of words. Criticism is hard to handle no matter your medium. That being said, I think it's better for authors to simply not read all the negative reviews of people they don't know & will probably never meet. Accept the critique of people whose opinions you actually value. Every writer gets some scathing reviews. It's just the nature of the beast.
To readers I say, like what you like, hate what you hate, & accept that people don't have to agree with you. For every person who hates a book, someone else loves it. Every book has a place...even if it's not on your shelf.


message 228: by The_book_b!tch (new)

The_book_b!tch My comment, albeit "after the rain" so to speak, I still feel compelled to leave it.

I don't think Fitzpatrick was trying to use "scare tactics" or saying reviewers should only spout rainbows & sunshine in reviews. Be honest ALWAYS. But in doing so you're not given a license to be an absolute bitch about something. I've read plenty of reviews on GoodReads & other sites where I just shook my head & thought:

"WHAT IN THE HELL WAS SHE/HE THINKING"?

It's okay not to like something, say it, state it, SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS, but don't get so personally abusive. It's a review, not a personal attack, unless that authors work has harmed you irreparably the DO take the high road (if you can find it) & be done with it.

Anything else makes you seem petty & small, especially tirades attacking an author's personal character in the name of "honest & un-censored reviewing". You can't tell me that it's beyond all of you to write a review that is honest without being a hateful witch. If it is, I feel sorry for you that you have to admit that.

My rule of thumb when writing a review is I don't post anything I wouldn't feel comfortable saying to the authors face if ever given the opportunity. And I mean every single word, the review in its entirety. I think a lot of people posting on the Internet take advantage of the anonymity & pop off at the mouth saying things they would never say to another person face to face.

So treat your reviews like a face to face encounter, don't put anything in there you wouldn't say under that type of situation. Simple. Criticism is fine, cruel belittling words just because you can with no consequence because its the Internet? Not fine.


message 229: by Tara (new)

Tara Tomko You really expect people to believe that you declined the manuscript for reasons other then you got your poor little feelings hurt? Please. This the epitome of catty. I'm sick of YA authors being bullies to people over the internet. Grow up, get a pair of balls and maybe think that your books just aren't that good.


message 230: by Vikaziza (new)

Vikaziza This is laughable! I get that it's amazing to have your book published and that it's hard to see how somebody criticizes your story. It is always difficult to accept criticism.
But you have to realize that every opinion moves you forward. Somebody can notice some mistakes in your story or have ideas on how to improve your story.
We don't write negative reviews just for the hell of it. Some of us simply have a different opinion on some books. And we have the right to write it.
Every criticism should be constructive.
And you as an adult should know that you can't please everyone. Just accept that some people have different option on your book.
To destroy someone else's chance of publishing a book like that is not just very selfish but also childish from you. Maybe their book is something good and original but we may never know it.
You should think about your actions and not feel offended by someone's opinion.
No one should behave like this.


1 2 3 5 next »
back to top