
never. these are our pet names.

my reviews are delicate snowflakes - every one unique and beautiful. then they melt and are awful.

it just scares me.
david has a misguided sense of proportion.

oh my god - this has devolved into a "suck david's dick" contest. DOES NO ONE SEE HOW DANGEROUS THIS IS??
Richard, recovering sock puppet wrote: "When I first started, I'd write the most self-indulgent reviews I could. Now, I try to write the most self-indulgent reviews I can, then relate the book to a personal crisis so nobody will feel co..."i love you as much as it is allowed to love a man married to a woman i also love.

there was only 1 dostoevsky i didn't like. out of four.
so if i badmouth his one book, he will never ever know.

is it okay if i give dostoevsky a bad review?

i loooove it when authors come on my threads.
um.

i think some of my shelf names are only meaningful to me. some of them are smiths lyrics. i try to group them thematically, but i have largely abandoned them. i should make new ones and take some time to reconfigure them. they have become untidy.

i try to be nice, but sometimes books are just bad.

this is what happens when you call me a "b'.

did you see what i just did that was awesome?? you sorrow, i respond!

that is because i am awesome.

what if it is in a different context? cuz sometimes that just comes up....

I AM NOT A B!!!
not for this anyway.
and very few of my reviews are over 60; i just have a lot of reviews. i think i have maybe three over 60.
i mostly stopped floating reviews... mostly. if you want me, come and find me....