14 books
—
10 voters
Popular Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 12,000

by (shelved 413 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 470,192 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 336 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,217,246 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 316 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 189,965 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 315 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.22 — 415,207 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 205 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,485 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 188 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 192,492 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 172 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 570,742 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 166 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.05 — 241,621 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 161 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.10 — 101,389 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 158 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 448,131 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 156 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 201,699 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 154 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 281,334 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 142 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,538 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 138 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 218,449 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 136 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 78,946 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 135 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 214,556 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 131 times as popular-science)
avg rating 3.90 — 280,397 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 129 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,770 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 123 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 41,302 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 122 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 40,435 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 120 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 55,640 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 117 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 111,980 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 111 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.35 — 54,474 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 109 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 888,921 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 108 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 85,093 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 108 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 791,758 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 107 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 40,176 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 106 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 41,127 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 103 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 32,953 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 101 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 51,885 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 91 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 96,318 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 90 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 235,861 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 90 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,630 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 89 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.18 — 30,745 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 89 times as popular-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 616,713 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 88 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 27,752 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 87 times as popular-science)
avg rating 3.99 — 64,957 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 86 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 851,058 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 85 times as popular-science)
avg rating 3.92 — 55,334 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 84 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 120,648 ratings — published 1859

by (shelved 81 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 44,847 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 81 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 846,960 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 80 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 28,498 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 78 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.36 — 198,487 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 78 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 30,304 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 76 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 38,886 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 73 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 174,255 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 73 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.15 — 77,867 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 71 times as popular-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 37,070 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 69 times as popular-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 59,729 ratings — published 2008

“Popular-science news about quantum mechanics is to me as baffling as it is frustrating. Hand me an equation, and I can deal with it. But if you tell me that quantum mechanics allows one to separate a cat from its grin or that an experiment shows "an irreconcilable mismatch between the friends and the Wigners," I'll back out of the room quietly before anyone demands I explain this mess. I have suffered through countless well-intended introductions to quantum mechanics featuring quantum shoes, quantum coins, quantum boxes, and entire zoos of quantum animals that went in and out of those boxes. If you actually understand those explanations, I salute you, because if I hadn't known already how quantum mechanics works, I still wouldn't know.”
― Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions
― Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions

“As the collected stories of the human journey, history offers the fundamental lesson that the challenges we face today aren't unique. No matter how much we flatter ourselves with self-absorption, we are but the continuation of the human saga.”
― From Gutenberg to Google: The History of Our Future
― From Gutenberg to Google: The History of Our Future
The following shelves are listed as duplicates of this shelf:
pop-sci, pop-science, popsci, and popularscience