Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
Reader's Digest (Association)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Anne
(new)
Sep 04, 2012 10:32PM

reply
|
flag

Reader's Digest Association (1067 works)
Editors of Reader's Digest (405)
Reader's Digest (108)
Reader's Digest Children's Books (75)
Is there a master plan regarding which versions we keep?
EDIT:
Make that TWO dozen versions of the name.
also kept:
Lila Wallace-Readers Digest Fund (real and separate organisation)

I think the company name is more appropriate than the "editors of" names - I merge them into the appropriate company when I run across them.
"Reader's Digest Children's Books" is iffy - this is actually an imprint of RD's Trade Publishing, but I can see the merit in keeping it it's own entity.

"Reader's Digest"
and "Editors of Reader's Digest"
both merged into "Reader's Digest Association".
Leaving "Reader's Digest Children's Books"
amd "Lila Wallace-Readers Digest Fund"
as separate authors.
Sounds good. I'd leave it a while for other comments 'cos it is a biggie edit.

In front of me says:
(Where RD = Reader's Digest, T = The, L = Ltd, years omitted)
"Reader's Digest" new line
"Great Detective Stories" on the cover.
Title Page "Selected by the Editors of RD"
Overleaf inside:
Pub TRDAL, London
© TRDAL
© RD (Aus) Pty L
© RD (NZ) L
© TRDA (Can) L
© TRDA SA (Pty) L
My abbreviations. Their brackets, not mine. Brackets around Pty not country, maybe they're getting confused too?
© TRDA Far East L
"Reader's Digest, The Digest and the Pegasus logo are registered trademarkes of TRDA, Inc."
NZ shortest. I prefer least words - brevity, simplicity, universality. Suffixes Ltd Pty Inc Corp depend on individual country incorporation laws.
GoodReads is international, and accurate. "Editors of RD" have selected, not written; editors are in author field with "editor" chosen beside name; RDL (in various incarnations) publish.
Glad final decisions not in my hands.
TA.