2025 Reading Challenge discussion
ARCHIVE: Monthly Challenges
>
February Mini-Challenge: Extra Day, Extra Reading





I really want to thank the mod because this challenge allows me to read a beautiful and interesting book about science, aging and life.







Thanks for the challenge! And thanks for the suggestion of Silently and Very Fast . I NEVER would have chosen that on my own, and I am so glad I read it!

Thanks go to Kara for the suggestion of Silently and Very Fast!
I didn't realize until I was finished with the book that it's the same author who wrote The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making... That's jumping to the top of my to-read list.
Finished Maus 2. Awesome novel, 5 stars.

Thanks go to Kar..."
I didn't realize until I noticed on the authors website that she was the author of another book I put on my TBR list this year, Radiance ! I will be definitely motivated to put that up to the top of the list now!

Read on Feb 24th.


I think Mitch Albom has done better, but this was very good, and its message is important: Don't get so worried about time that you forget to use it wisely and appreciate the beauty of each day.
I think I did okay on that point today, as did everyone who participated in this challenge!





I enjoyed Island of the Blue Dolphins, but it didn't really speak to me. I understand why it won a Newbery, though!


This was such a fun challenge, and I loved hearing about everyone's reactions to their books!





I really liked Candide when I read it my freshman year of university.
I finished They Exist. I really enjoyed it and immediately started on the next book in the Creatus series. I'm glad Book Bub dropped it into my email the other day. Now, as if I need prodding, I'm going back through the topic and picking new books that sound interesting!

I also read Candide! I gave it two stars. I appreciate the satirical criticism, but, like you said, it gets silly and repetitive.
(I notice that I rate books more strictly when I read them for myself/for fun than when I had to read them back in school/at uni.)

Catherine - I'm so sorry that I missed your number for me - I didn't check the site for a few days so didn't see your message until now. But I need something else to read now, so I thought I'd pick out Number 39 in my shelf at home - and I've wound up with a Dostoyevsky omnibus!! It has "Crime And Punishment" (which I've been wanting to read forever but haven't felt I was smart enough to!) "The Gambler" and "Notes From The Underground" in it - none of which I have read. So I'm going to try it - and use it for my Modern Miss Darcy Challenge under "a book that intimidates you" because it certainly fits that bill lol! So thanks for that!!

It wasn't so much the prose for me as it was the dialogue, but I'll agree that it was a bit strange at the start, though I did get into it eventually. Never quite got used to Santiago talking to himself though, even if I get that it was a device to reveal some of Santiago to us. I do think you're right that he was trying to portray him as simple but complex, mind - I delved into Hemingway a bit after and people like to talk a lot about his iceberg theory or something like that, where he keeps it simple on the surface and leaves the complex underneath, which makes sense, but even without that I now think that he really was creating a type of respectful and charged version of a person, someone who's content to fish and likes his baseball and someone who gets on well with Manolin and knows his stuff, but also someone capable of great beauty and understanding and passion too, all at the same time, and there's no contradiction in there at all, because that's what people are like. Or at least I like to think that's what they're like. :)

It was pretty fascinating! Not "easy" reading, for sure, but very interesting and thought-provoking.


But as well as that it's not impossible either that there's an idea of him communing with the wild as it were. Certainly he spoke to the fish and the sharks a lot. So when I think about in those terms it works for me. In fact, it might just have been that the way he spoke was a little unusual for me again, as well as the way he moved from speaking internally to externally and back. Although, saying that, I completely get why he didn't talk to himself in his head the whole time.

Andrew and Ecem - how did you go with your challenges?

Congratulations all. We had about 85 people sign up! I'm glad you all liked this challenge and look for our next one day challenge in April.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Tumor (other topics)Silently and Very Fast (other topics)
Candide (other topics)
Creatus (They Exist) (other topics)
Suspended Sentences: Three Novellas (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Voltaire (other topics)Patrick Modiano (other topics)
Tom Preston (other topics)
Voltaire (other topics)
Anne Rice (other topics)
More...
Paul, I didn't realize The Old Man and the Sea was short enough to read in a day, and now I'm intrigued by your description.
I'm about..."
I'm not sure when I realised it myself, but yes! I read it in two sittings today on the way back and forth from college, which would put it at about an hour or an hour and a half or so I think. Definitely no more than two hours.
I'm fairly sure my description of it doesn't come close to the reality of it at all, but it does give me the impression of being one of those Great American Things (it's got a Pulitzer Prize and all), and even better I feel like it's short enough that it wouldn't feel like that bad a time sink for people who end up not liking it (which is absolutely possible and completely understandable). Not to mention you can use it for bonus points in the I Spy challenge ;) which to be fair is part of the reason I (finally?) picked it up this year. :)